|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Jan 29, 2016 23:24:25 GMT
Will there be a map of Asia?
|
|
|
|
Post by Conrad von Hotzendorf on Jan 29, 2016 23:47:25 GMT
Will there be a map of Asia? given that Japan and the Qing dynasty are playable, yeah most likely |
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Jan 30, 2016 0:12:53 GMT
For Conspiracy tech do you mean we can only try to roll it for a country twice per phrase or do you mean we can only do a successful rebellion for a country twice per phrase. You can only roll twice per phase. And if it's succesful on the first roll, you can't just roll on a different country as well hence the 1 country rule. Woah woah woah, if you declare war on an alliance, and you border multiple countries of that said alliance, only being able to attack one screws you over. Not only that, but only attacking twice would prolong the war more than last war, and last war you could attack as much as you want! |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Jan 30, 2016 1:00:12 GMT
You can only roll twice per phase. And if it's succesful on the first roll, you can't just roll on a different country as well hence the 1 country rule. Woah woah woah, if you declare war on an alliance, and you border multiple countries of that said alliance, only being able to attack one screws you over. Not only that, but only attacking twice would prolong the war more than last war, and last war you could attack as much as you want! You can only use conspiracy on one country per phase. You can actually attack as many as you like. |
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Jan 30, 2016 1:13:09 GMT
Woah woah woah, if you declare war on an alliance, and you border multiple countries of that said alliance, only being able to attack one screws you over. Not only that, but only attacking twice would prolong the war more than last war, and last war you could attack as much as you want! You can only use conspiracy on one country per phase. You can actually attack as many as you like. That's what I get for not reading everything lmao. |
|
|
|
Post by Władysław Anders on Jan 30, 2016 2:42:22 GMT
Sorry forgot about that, i have a question about generals:
1. Turkey inly has Inou. Thats sux.
2. So can i bring in old ottoman generals who, in real, were alive at this time
#Kemal Attaturk
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Jan 30, 2016 2:47:18 GMT
Is it fine to add the ROC general in Qing?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Jan 30, 2016 3:00:57 GMT
Sorry forgot about that, i have a question about generals: 1. Turkey inly has Inou. Thats sux. 2. So can i bring in old ottoman generals who, in real, were alive at this time #Kemal Attaturk For the third time, ANY GENERAL from WW2 can be recruited. |
|
|
|
Post by Władysław Anders on Jan 30, 2016 3:03:31 GMT
OH! NOT JUST WC3. OKAY. LOL THANKS
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Jan 30, 2016 3:36:35 GMT
If you are Ottoman, recruit Montgomery if you want to. Recruit Guderian or Rommel. It can literally be anyone.
Every general will have Attack, Defense, and Naval power.
|
|
|
|
Post by Władysław Anders on Jan 30, 2016 4:25:43 GMT
I choose Inou. Anyway, i want to be more realistic so thats why. But, i must say, that the generals should actually be picked from ww1, why? This is 1925. only 6 years after ww1, while it is about 14 years before ww2. More than a double years difference
|
|
|
|
Post by Władysław Anders on Jan 30, 2016 4:38:06 GMT
Neutral Tech tree:  |
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Jan 30, 2016 8:14:12 GMT
Mountbatten NO NUKES, BAD IDEA!!! Sorry but it is one of the most solid rules of the theo. wars. Please please please remove the nukes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Władysław Anders on Jan 30, 2016 9:39:21 GMT
Mountbatten NO NUKES, BAD IDEA!!! Sorry but it is one of the most solid rules of the theo. wars. Please please please remove the nukes. I like the idea of nukes! But there has to be strict regulations about them and their damage. |
|
|
|
Post by Władysław Anders on Jan 30, 2016 9:40:38 GMT
Im almost a darth vader. That was v.fast.
|
|
.jpg)
