|
|
Post by Port on Apr 6, 2021 15:19:32 GMT
Too Bad. Learn to use Guderian and Panther. Or Worse Guderian on an Armored Car with unranked Special Forces because who the heck upgrades those  I think theres only been like 3 missions where I have had 2 Heavy Tanks so there is that.  BUT YES CLEARLY I AM CORRECT.  Your overuse of emotes tells me otherwise but that may only be from personal trauma. WHAT TRAUMA, eeeeef |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Apr 6, 2021 15:21:05 GMT
Rommel can now use the KV-6 in Challenge Mode, that's what I was basing my argument on. He is clearly #1 on Heavies in Challenge Mode, Vatutin is probably 2nd now because movement in that mode is off ZERO importance Movement was of Zero importance anyway, but I prefer Monty, although I use Vatutin for his Price. As expected from Gerd von Rundstedt. |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Apr 6, 2021 15:21:49 GMT
Movement was of Zero importance anyway, but I prefer Monty, although I use Vatutin for his Price. As expected from Gerd von Rundstedt . I use Vatutin for his price as well, Montgomery is Extravagant. |
|
|
|
Post by Amazing on Apr 6, 2021 16:15:14 GMT
From what I've learned from discussing with the other members of the forum, the argument of Vatutin VS Roko/Monty all comes down to personally preference, bias, play style, and experience. I'ld say it depends on what exactly You are interested in. In case You just want to complete the game perfectly there is no need to debate at all. This is not EW5 and nor even EW6:1804 Any general will suffice. In case You are playing for challenge, speedrun, competition You need the best. I agree. Play with the generals you find the most fun. / Play what you find fun. I'm doing a Pure-Soviet Only Nuzlocke Allied Campaign Challenge for fun. In terms of the best/challenge mode/speedrun, I think its probably heavily playstyle dependent on who the best is. Vatutin v Roko/Monty or Rundstedt v Yamashita all comes down to do you like a chance at attacking again or doing more fixed damage. Its close enough that a debate can be had. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Apr 6, 2021 16:27:27 GMT
In my opinion, movement only matters for artillery. I find that my tanks and infantry have no problem moving with each other, but my artillery is usually too slow, so I have to slow down my other units for them. I know that this problem can be easily remedied with transport troops, but I'd rather save that 6 economy for something else. Plus, I find that without a special force, my artillery doesn't do a lot of damage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 10, 2021 15:43:08 GMT
Lol I am gonna get Rundstedt and Kuribiyashi for axis side, and on allies slide Bradley and Macarthur. That way my axis infantry is slow as turtles yet hard hitting whereas my allies team is fast yet Vurnerable.
On allies side upgrade the damage. On axis side upgrade the movement of special forces
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Apr 10, 2021 15:52:53 GMT
Lol I am gonna get Rundstedt and Kuribiyashi for axis side, and on allies slide Bradley and Macarthur. That way my axis infantry is slow as turtles yet hard hitting whereas my allies team is fast yet Vurnerable. On allies side upgrade the damage. On axis side upgrade the movement of special forces Just a reminder that on infantry, Yamashita's and Mac's survivability is on par with Rundstedt. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 10, 2021 16:36:26 GMT
Lol I am gonna get Rundstedt and Kuribiyashi for axis side, and on allies slide Bradley and Macarthur. That way my axis infantry is slow as turtles yet hard hitting whereas my allies team is fast yet Vurnerable. On allies side upgrade the damage. On axis side upgrade the movement of special forces Just a reminder that on infantry, Yamashita's and Mac's survivability is on par with Rundstedt. Its not the survability but the damage that makes me so drawn to rundstedt and kuri. Max infantry leader and bayonet charge + raider! |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Apr 10, 2021 16:52:49 GMT
Just a reminder that on infantry, Yamashita's and Mac's survivability is on par with Rundstedt. Its not the survability but the damage that makes me so drawn to rundstedt and kuri. Max infantry leader and bayonet charge + raider! If I remember correctly You said that You use these gens along with Eisenhower. And that makes a lot of difference. As they can benefit from his aura. And the benefit is huge especially when Leader triggers. In case You do use them this way You can't advice this tactic to the guys without Eisenhower because their results will be much much much worse. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 10, 2021 18:20:22 GMT
Its not the survability but the damage that makes me so drawn to rundstedt and kuri. Max infantry leader and bayonet charge + raider! If I remember correctly You said that You use these gens along with Eisenhower. And that makes a lot of difference. As they can benefit from his aura. And the benefit is huge especially when Leader triggers. In case You do use them this way You can't advice this tactic to the guys without Eisenhower because their results will be much much much worse. You are very correct andrei. W/O Eisenhower, I’d say that Bayonet Charge >>> Infantry Leader as infantry doesn’t do enough damage on its own. |
|
