|
|
Post by gladiator on Apr 16, 2021 1:01:03 GMT
Hi everyone. I'm kinda intrested in the what are the criteria of giving medals and skills to commanders. Is there any system of rating or they simply provide the best abilities to the most famous guys, especially to the big army groups bosses like Zhukov, Rundstedt etc.? Like why such the terrible commanders (in reality) as Graziani or Konev are relatively serious in Easytech games ? Thanks for replies beforehead.
|
|
|
|
Post by 曹操 on Apr 16, 2021 1:22:08 GMT
Hi everyone. I'm kinda intrested in the what are the criteria of giving medals and skills to commanders. Is there any system of rating or they simply provide the best abilities to the most famous guys, especially to the big army groups bosses like Zhukov, Rundstedt etc.? Like why such the terrible commanders (in reality) as Graziani or Konev are relatively serious in Easytech games ? Thanks for replies beforehead. Konev? Graziani in IRL is terrible but... Konev? He might be terrible during the start of Barbarossa but starting from 1943/1942? (I dont remember), He was a great general. |
|
|
|
Post by Don Quixote de la Mancha on Apr 16, 2021 2:12:44 GMT
gladiator, I think that rather, they underestimate most generals capacities and buy into certain "myths" of the generals during the war. Such as Monty was a the best general of the British or that all none great power generals are weak
|
|
