|
Post by Monty :D on May 16, 2015 1:41:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by saltin on May 16, 2015 2:48:29 GMT
Thanks for that monty and I see you added a legend too so now we can tell what is what too So basically a lot of these Istanbul generals are place holders,till we can find something better.
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on May 16, 2015 11:02:03 GMT
Mannerheim is really In a league of his own though, saving up for him now.
|
|
|
Post by Monty on May 16, 2015 12:56:33 GMT
For 20 medals less, you can get Leeb, A really great artillery general...
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Mar 13, 2016 10:02:14 GMT
Mannerheim is great in conquest 1939 as Finland. Rundstedt is Also a great infantry general.
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 13, 2016 11:56:29 GMT
Mannerheim is great in conquest 1939 as Finland. Rundstedt is Also a great infantry general. Rundstedt is not that great. Normally Vasilivsky is way better, and if you want a mountain infantry, Schorner is better,m. Rundstedt is the best mountain---tank. Yes, tank.
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Mar 13, 2016 14:30:00 GMT
Franco is pure junk and not worth the price. 1000+ medals is crazy for him.
|
|
|
Post by TK421 on Mar 13, 2016 14:56:29 GMT
Mannerheim is great in conquest 1939 as Finland. Rundstedt is Also a great infantry general. Rundstedt is not that great. Normally Vasilivsky is way better, and if you want a mountain infantry, Schorner is better,m. Rundstedt is the best mountain---tank. Yes, tank. Schorner? I feel slightly offended...
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Mar 13, 2016 15:22:31 GMT
For me, its all about the stars, sorry
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 13, 2016 16:24:52 GMT
Rundstedt is not that great. Normally Vasilivsky is way better, and if you want a mountain infantry, Schorner is better,m. Rundstedt is the best mountain---tank. Yes, tank. Schorner? I feel slightly offended... Dude, the ariport is there, you can leave your anger to Schorner by your fighters.
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 13, 2016 16:26:08 GMT
Franco is pure junk and not worth the price. 1000+ medals is crazy for him. He is a pure meat shield... If I want a meat shield I still won't buy him.
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 13, 2016 18:49:30 GMT
For me, its all about the stars, sorry The skills does help out a lot as well... so I look at both because stars add damage and most skills do add flat damage as well.
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Mar 13, 2016 19:05:42 GMT
Since im too lazy to watch all these formulas, im just gonna buy all them good generals in wc3 Currently I have a good group of them including: Montgomery, Guderian, Rommel, Patton and more
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 13, 2016 19:11:56 GMT
Since im too lazy to watch all these formulas, im just gonna buy all them good generals in wc3 Currently I have a good group of them including: Montgomery, Guderian, Rommel, Patton and more I don't really follow the formulas that closely. It's not hard to get a "feel" of which is better. Plus if you press on the skills, it will tell you how much it contribute from that skill and at that level, specifically. Then simply compare to another guy's skills, the stars are even easier if you just keep in mind that each star gives 8 dmg.
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Mar 13, 2016 19:24:18 GMT
Yeah I go for who I like and want... including me.
|
|