|
|
Post by António Salazar on Feb 11, 2016 15:02:12 GMT
roflol Napoleon Bonaparte I was planning to give you Ceylon but attacking German troops? Attacking India province, we need to capture 3 cities in order to have the province conquered. 1) Attack on , Kerala 8 (big city) bfa7ZXmH2) Bombay, 8 3) Delhi, 8 ····· |
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Feb 11, 2016 15:03:07 GMT
Ouch, several armies were lost
4) Attack on Delhi
5) Attack on Karachi
6,7,8) 3 new armies build in India/Karachi·rSq0vWEJ
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Feb 11, 2016 15:04:45 GMT
yz0nhQsJ
···
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Feb 11, 2016 15:05:03 GMT
[post deleted] Never mind·61gtzjdN
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Feb 11, 2016 15:09:58 GMT
You may praise yourself happy Napoleon Bonaparte that I did not use my last 3 turns to attack Birma. I am sick of being randomly attacked without warnings. Estonia has to pay for it. Now you have to pay for it too. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Feb 11, 2016 15:18:11 GMT
Ouch, several armies were lost 4) Attack on Delhi 5) Attack on Karachi 6,7,8) 3 new armies build in India/Karachi ·rSq0vWEJain't gonna happen Talley, I already have one of your city and this tactic is old, come up with something else 2) I have 6 infantries in that city I hold if yours 3) AIN'T NOBODY GONNA GET KARACHI! |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Feb 11, 2016 15:19:37 GMT
You may praise yourself happy Napoleon Bonaparte that I did not use my last 3 turns to attack Birma. I am sick of being randomly attacked without warnings. Estonia has to pay for it. Now you have to pay for it too. redo your turns, you literally popped outta nowhere and took Karachi while I still hold that city in north of Ceylon |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2016 15:25:41 GMT
Can anyone tell to me how the heck António Salazar attacked 3 biggest cities of India(and Dheli is capital) out of nowhere? |
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Feb 11, 2016 15:44:46 GMT
I am in Ceylon, as Napoleon Bonaparte taking one harbor does not mean I can not attack you. I understand you are upset but complaining against this in absolute nonsense, Remember that Germany has just won a WORLD WAR. I refuse to redo my turns since I have set fair numbers for my dices (8) because I am in disadvantage. No complaining, period. You captured one city Khurram, this does not mean you block my attacks. Same story goes for you: People stop being naive, it is obvious I am going to strike back after you attacked me. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2016 15:57:29 GMT
António Salazar I see your point, but straight for his Capital is bit too OP and if you had 8 for big cities when you are disadvantaged then capital should be +1
|
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Feb 11, 2016 16:02:42 GMT
António Salazar I see your point, but straight for his Capital is bit too OP and if you had 8 for big cities when you are disadvantaged then capital should be +1 I think he did good this time. Lost a few armies, things seem to be in balance. |
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Feb 11, 2016 16:11:41 GMT
António Salazar I see your point, but straight for his Capital is bit too OP and if you had 8 for big cities when you are disadvantaged then capital should be +1 I do not agree on the capital but Bombay should have been a 9. I lost a couple of armies. Also we have to look at the quality of armies: A German army should be better than an Indian one. (Historically) |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2016 16:27:10 GMT
António Salazar even so they aren't much worse they even could be balanced as India had some intresting warior types(some still stand), but we are looking technologically right now, so I think they are on the same page. And capital is always higher than any city in region.
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Feb 11, 2016 17:04:14 GMT
António Salazar even so they aren't much worse they even could be balanced as India had some intresting warior types(some still stand), but we are looking technologically right now, so I think they are on the same page. And capital is always higher than any city in region. We can't say Delhi is the capital since India did not exist back then. I took the biggest city Bombay. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Feb 11, 2016 18:34:04 GMT
António Salazar even so they aren't much worse they even could be balanced as India had some intresting warior types(some still stand), but we are looking technologically right now, so I think they are on the same page. And capital is always higher than any city in region. We can't say Delhi is the capital since India did not exist back then. I took the biggest city Bombay. 1) Who in the hell says that Delhi wasn't the capital back in 1930? Are you really serious? Because that never happened.2) Mumbai isn't the biggest city in India, its Delhi back then.3) you have to roll a ten to get Delhi,its a "capital".4) you have Karachi, Kerala and Mumbai right? |
|
