|
|
Post by Arya Stark on May 25, 2021 0:00:48 GMT
Yeah I use cav or arty for damage dealing and for holding the line, t2-t3 line infantry usually suffice. I have Dobeln but use him rarely Isn't Dobelen even better than Kutuzov? To learn is infantry nice, but as you said: For holding the line (and the last shot) is double or tripple infantry enough, a headquarter general as meat-shield is not a good idea. Tripple line infantry I use barely, there quite expensive for only 25HP more, and the formation factor is only with β₯80% health different. He is, but the fact that I use infantry only once in a while means I can go after a mid tier inf gen with mass fire, and Dobeln is one of the best mid tier inf gens out there. Low cost and potentially high reward. |
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on May 25, 2021 0:18:55 GMT
Isn't Dobelen even better than Kutuzov? To learn is infantry nice, but as you said: For holding the line (and the last shot) is double or tripple infantry enough, a headquarter general as meat-shield is not a good idea. Tripple line infantry I use barely, there quite expensive for only 25HP more, and the formation factor is only with β₯80% health different. He is, but the fact that I use infantry only once in a while means I can go after a mid tier inf gen with mass fire, and Dobeln is one of the best mid tier inf gens out there. Low cost and potentially high reward. Dobelen is the better choice. But for these rare missions where I need an infantry general on MG, I have Sakurako - she fills every gap. Lan is also not bad for city defendinng on infantry (one mission - in Moscov ?) |
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on May 25, 2021 3:46:12 GMT
Formation doesn't work and fireproof is easily replaceable by the firetruck. If it's a useful skill, just get the truck.
That leaves us with siege master and defense Art. Since there are no natural defensive hexes against infantry, bugle is far less useful than strike and accuracy. With Siege master, only trenches and bunkers should be avoided.
Overall a solid 3, good in game but not good enough to make the team.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on May 25, 2021 12:58:22 GMT
Suvorov has better output (Kutuzov lacks bugle) and Lannes has both Mass Fire and leadership so he can withstand flanks and cav charges better than Kutuzov. Even when Kutuzov is regrouped once. However, they both have a skill that is useless: Inf Tactics and Geography. In addition, Leadership is not an excellent skill for infantry as they will rarely go behind enemy lines. Lannes. IMO the main thing about Kutuzov is that he lacks Bugle, but so does Lannes. If he did have it, it would be bad as well, because of Siege Master. I think he is an excellent Hybrid in a game where an all-round hybrid is scorned by most players. You can put Lannes on cavalry for princess runs and make his geography skill useful |
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on May 25, 2021 13:01:58 GMT
However, they both have a skill that is useless: Inf Tactics and Geography. In addition, Leadership is not an excellent skill for infantry as they will rarely go behind enemy lines. Lannes. IMO the main thing about Kutuzov is that he lacks Bugle, but so does Lannes. If he did have it, it would be bad as well, because of Siege Master. I think he is an excellent Hybrid in a game where an all-round hybrid is scorned by most players. You can put Lannes on cavalry for princess runs and make his geography skill useful And lets not forget Davout. Two Aghas and Davout is a 5* Cav with Assault Art + Geography. If only he had strike instead of surprise...  |
|
