|
|
Post by irvin on May 30, 2021 14:28:51 GMT
You count in ideal conditions , when reality is different
In reality, Yama goes straight to strongest enemy unit (Runstedt is half way at that moment) and hits with Guerilla , decreasing enemy attack, so you continue same turn with other units on weakened enemy
In addition, you have 12 dmg more from Yama , what’s important to destroy fast
After first move, I often send Yama further to destroy heavy arty, that attacks your tanks. At this moment Runstedt is queuing to first enemy
Of course, others play different from me
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexyx on May 30, 2021 19:54:21 GMT
My eyes bleed.
Fire Suppression is 10 p.p. worse than Guerrilla. I get it that you like steady bonuses more, but maths speaks about it differently and this time it doesn't even depend on the way it's programmed.
Let X be the times your general attacks
Expected DMG input for FS general is (1-FS%)*X=(1-0,4)X=0.6X
Expected DMG input for G general is X*p (where p=1-G% is probability of getting hit), so= 0.5*X
You can clearly see, that Guerrilla gens take 16,666% less counterattack dmg on average. Yes, FS is always 60% and G will vary in small numbers, but over time you are better off with G general.
I don't think any general actually has these skills, but Expected DMG input for G&FS general is X*p*(1-FS%)=0.3X
This is Dmg negation
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexyx on May 30, 2021 19:55:19 GMT
Personally, I use both Arthur and Yama, but when I can choose, the latter is prefered
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on May 31, 2021 18:29:46 GMT
My eyes bleed. Fire Suppression is 10 p.p. worse than Guerrilla. I get it that you like steady bonuses more, but maths speaks about it differently and this time it doesn't even depend on the way it's programmed. Let X be the times your general attacks Expected DMG input for FS general is (1-FS%)*X=(1-0,4)X=0.6X Expected DMG input for G general is X*p (where p=1-G% is probability of getting hit), so= 0.5*X You can clearly see, that Guerrilla gens take 16,666% less counterattack dmg on average. Yes, FS is always 60% and G will vary in small numbers, but over time you are better off with G general. I don't think any general actually has these skills, but Expected DMG input for G&FS general is X*p*(1-FS%)=0.3X This is Dmg negation Sir, however, the thing is that you can be sure of getting lower damage with FS. This way, you can attack KV-6 Rokossovsky without a nasty surprise. It allows you to be able to deal damage to tanks without being obliterated half the time, even if G does take off more damage, part (probably near all, because you have a chance of being destroyed) of that will be when you would take minor damage anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by Alexyx on May 31, 2021 19:32:15 GMT
As I said: In the long run you are better with Guerrilla. But you can do whatever you think is better anyway. For Example, I bought Boris, maxed 2 inf generals and 2 tank gens.
|
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on Jun 1, 2021 12:47:47 GMT
As I said: In the long run you are better with Guerrilla. But you can do whatever you think is better anyway. For Example, I bought Boris, maxed 2 inf generals and 2 tank gens. wholesome |
|
