|
Post by Heinz1Guderian1 on Aug 20, 2021 1:46:16 GMT
choose a tank or a crew and tell moi why you would use the tank
|
|
|
Post by Heinz1Guderian1 on Aug 20, 2021 1:47:10 GMT
i know more tanks i didnt want to put them down tho
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Aug 20, 2021 6:50:22 GMT
Where's IS-2? Anyways I'll have to choose KV-1 as it's named after me.
|
|
|
Post by Heinz1Guderian1 on Aug 20, 2021 16:14:00 GMT
Where's IS-2? Anyways I'll have to choose KV-1 as it's named after me. KV-1 its a good tank but its slow and has to many problems with the sights same with the kv 2 id go with the comet(didnt put it down) or the tiger 1
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Aug 20, 2021 16:26:18 GMT
Where's IS-2? Anyways I'll have to choose KV-1 as it's named after me. KV-1 its a good tank but its slow and has to many problems with the sights same with the kv 2 id go with the comet(didnt put it down) or the tiger 1 The Tiger I was better than the KV-1, but the IS-2 was better than both.
|
|
|
Post by Heinz1Guderian1 on Aug 20, 2021 17:41:08 GMT
KV-1 its a good tank but its slow and has to many problems with the sights same with the kv 2 id go with the comet(didnt put it down) or the tiger 1 The Tiger I was better than the KV-1, but the IS-2 was better than both. oh ho! the IS-2 was a good tank id go with since it has a 188mm? i think or a 120mm and the IS-2 was da only tank that can destory a tiger 2
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Aug 20, 2021 17:43:32 GMT
The Tiger I was better than the KV-1, but the IS-2 was better than both. oh ho! the IS-2 was a good tank id go with since it has a 188mm? i think or a 120mm and the IS-2 was da only tank that can destory a tiger 2 Yeah, Stalin could destroy a tiger any day.
|
|
|
Post by Heinz1Guderian1 on Aug 20, 2021 17:46:51 GMT
oh ho! the IS-2 was a good tank id go with since it has a 188mm? i think or a 120mm and the IS-2 was da only tank that can destory a tiger 2 Yeah, Stalin could destroy a tiger any day. the chad IS-2 vs the virgin Tiger 2
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Aug 20, 2021 17:58:52 GMT
Yeah, Stalin could destroy a tiger any day. the chad IS-2 vs the virgin Tiger 2 Putin's only tagging tigers when Stalin destroyed them.
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Aug 24, 2021 6:27:46 GMT
A Soviet T-34 tank. Because when it was rolled out, German Panzer's shells would bounce of T34s instead of blasting or piercing it's armor. So you can sleep peacefully, knowing that unless you are dumb or careless, you won't be killed by German tanks.
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Aug 24, 2021 6:28:44 GMT
A Soviet T-34 tank. Because when it was rolled out, German Panzer's shells would bounce of T34s instead of blasting or piercing it's armor. So you can sleep peacefully, knowing that unless you are dumb or careless, you won't be killed by German tanks. But, when the Tigers came...
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Aug 24, 2021 6:31:16 GMT
A Soviet T-34 tank. Because when it was rolled out, German Panzer's shells would bounce of T34s instead of blasting or piercing it's armor. So you can sleep peacefully, knowing that unless you are dumb or careless, you won't be killed by German tanks. But, when the Tigers came... When Tigers came, the worst part of the war for the Soviets was over. Also, they were difficult to maintain too.
|
|
|
Post by Manfred von Richthofen on Aug 24, 2021 6:39:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Manfred von Richthofen on Aug 24, 2021 6:41:14 GMT
t-34-41. I've never seem those but at least it's Soviet.
|
|
|
Post by Captain on Aug 24, 2021 16:00:17 GMT
T-34,😏😏 it faced the German's heart
|
|