|
|
Post by nochbv on Sept 2, 2021 14:51:37 GMT
so I was looking at the 82 airborn and it said that it moves via carrier. but the rest of the air moves via troop transport. What is the difference
|
|
|
|
Post by Nhyjj on Sept 2, 2021 14:53:07 GMT
so I was looking at the 82 airborn and it said that it moves via carrier. but the rest of the air moves via troop transport. What is the difference No one understands the description of the 82nd airborn |
|
|
|
Post by nochbv on Sept 2, 2021 14:57:41 GMT
so I was looking at the 82 airborn and it said that it moves via carrier. but the rest of the air moves via troop transport. What is the difference No one understands the description of the 82nd airborn ah, looks like easytech let an chichiwauwa write the description |
|
|
|
Post by Nhyjj on Sept 2, 2021 15:02:13 GMT
No one understands the description of the 82nd airborn ah, looks like easytech let an chichiwauwa write the description I think no one ever managed to use his ability to paradrop from a carrier. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 2, 2021 15:04:24 GMT
I really don't understand why ET can't hire decent English translators. There are plenty respectable online services. Probably ET is not a big company, but a good English translation definitely won't ruin their budget.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Sept 2, 2021 15:07:37 GMT
Probably an inconsistency stemming from a mistranslation that went unnoticed. The sentence means that they use some form of transport or "carriers" or "transport aircraft" to get airborne from an airport.
Never really paid much attention to the description so it didn't confuse me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nhyjj on Sept 2, 2021 15:10:16 GMT
I think they just wanted to make the 82nd airborn look cooler. HE USES CARRIER AIRCRAFT INSTEAD OF TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT SO HE CAN PARADROP 11 TILES AWAY OMG!
|
|
|
|
Post by Lucklife on Sept 2, 2021 16:59:29 GMT
I think they just wanted to make the 82nd airborn look cooler. HE USES CARRIER AIRCRAFT INSTEAD OF TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT SO HE CAN PARADROP 11 TILES AWAY OMG! Me using 82nd Airborne while replaying 1941: Hmm yes, the carrier is somewhere in the snow |
|
|
|
Post by nochbv on Sept 3, 2021 6:17:44 GMT
I think they just wanted to make the 82nd airborn look cooler. HE USES CARRIER AIRCRAFT INSTEAD OF TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT SO HE CAN PARADROP 11 TILES AWAY OMG! Me using 82nd Airborne while replaying 1941: Hmm yes, the carrier is somewhere in the snowof cource, glorious russian tactics, hide carrier in snow so noone wil get to it |
|
|
|
Post by Manfred von Richthofen on Sept 3, 2021 6:18:53 GMT
Me using 82nd Airborne while replaying 1941: Hmm yes, the carrier is somewhere in the snowof cource, glorious russian tactics, hide carrier in snow so noone wil get to it What if the Germans realize that they stepped on the carrier? |
|
|
|
Post by nochbv on Sept 3, 2021 8:55:46 GMT
of cource, glorious russian tactics, hide carrier in snow so noone wil get to it What if the Germans realize that they stepped on the carrier? hmm good point, maybe shoot them after they find out |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Sept 3, 2021 9:16:54 GMT
of cource, glorious russian tactics, hide carrier in snow so noone wil get to it What if the Germans realize that they stepped on the carrier? Simple, put Manfred von Richthofen on a submarine and hunt it down. |
|
|
|
Post by Nhyjj on Sept 3, 2021 11:21:01 GMT
Me using 82nd Airborne while replaying 1941: Hmm yes, the carrier is somewhere in the snowof cource, glorious russian tactics, hide carrier in snow so noone wil get to it That and the land submarines |
|
|
|
Post by nochbv on Sept 3, 2021 12:51:35 GMT
of cource, glorious russian tactics, hide carrier in snow so noone wil get to it That and the land submarines indeed comrade, (a bit weird that there are no ship special forces doh) |
|
