|
|
Post by Thortilla on Dec 21, 2021 21:34:33 GMT
ET MAKES ME SUFFER
What was the need of the XD?
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Dec 22, 2021 18:00:18 GMT
Shrimant Peshwa Madhavrao Bhat, I love the profile name. Such an interesting character in American political history. Very conservative in some aspects, very liberal in others.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Dec 22, 2021 18:36:42 GMT
Shrimant Peshwa Madhavrao Bhat, I love the profile name. Such an interesting character in American political history. Very conservative in some aspects, very liberal in others. An interesting racist indeed. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Dec 22, 2021 18:43:27 GMT
Shrimant Peshwa Madhavrao Bhat, I love the profile name. Such an interesting character in American political history. Very conservative in some aspects, very liberal in others. An interesting racist indeed. Exactly. A virulent racist through most of his political career, and a very racially liberal (for an Alabaman) in the beginning and at the end. |
|
|
|
Post by Shrimant Peshwa Madhavrao Bhat on Dec 23, 2021 17:01:09 GMT
Shrimant Peshwa Madhavrao Bhat, I love the profile name. Such an interesting character in American political history. Very conservative in some aspects, very liberal in others. An interesting racist indeed. How was he racist? Unless consider Hippies a race. |
|
|
|
Post by 6Johnny23 on Dec 23, 2021 17:38:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Shrimant Peshwa Madhavrao Bhat on Dec 23, 2021 18:56:05 GMT
How does that incident make him racist? He was just protesting against desegragation of public places, unless one considers identity politics as racism. |
|
|
|
Post by 6Johnny23 on Dec 23, 2021 19:00:01 GMT
How does that incident make him racist? He was just protesting against desegragation of public places, unless one considers identity politics as racism. Well, segregation is considered to be quite racist by some. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Dec 23, 2021 19:01:07 GMT
How does that incident make him racist? He was just protesting against desegragation of public places, unless one considers identity politics as racism. I don't know what is racism, if protesting against desegregation isn't. He literally believed that African Americans were an "inferior race". |
|
|
|
Post by Shrimant Peshwa Madhavrao Bhat on Dec 24, 2021 11:06:41 GMT
How does that incident make him racist? He was just protesting against desegragation of public places, unless one considers identity politics as racism. Well, segregation is considered to be quite racist by some. I don't think segregation was "racist", there's no reason to think so. |
|
|
|
Post by Shrimant Peshwa Madhavrao Bhat on Dec 24, 2021 11:10:22 GMT
How does that incident make him racist? He was just protesting against desegragation of public places, unless one considers identity politics as racism. I don't know what is racism, if protesting against desegregation isn't. Racism involves discrimination, but segregation barely had anything to do with discrimination. He literally believed that African Americans were an "inferior race". Source? |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Dec 24, 2021 11:31:34 GMT
I don't know what is racism, if protesting against desegregation isn't. Racism involves discrimination, but segregation barely had anything to do with discrimination. He literally believed that African Americans were an "inferior race". Source?  |
|
|
|
Post by Shrimant Peshwa Madhavrao Bhat on Dec 24, 2021 15:25:17 GMT
Racism involves discrimination, but segregation barely had anything to do with discrimination. Source? . That's a fair argument from Wallace, crime rate was high among blacks. Your source's conclusion is based on assumption that by "... deteriated to that of the Mongrel complexity", Wallace meant that blacks were inferior race. I don't think he meant that. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Dec 24, 2021 16:54:35 GMT
I love the back and forth. However, Wallace is considered by many, including myself, to be a racist. While segregation in and of itself is not racist, american southern segregation in the 1960s certainly was. He certainly beleived that the Negroid class of race was inclined to more crimes (while blacks do commit more crimes in the US, it is definitely not due to their skin color), although he definitely also believed that they should be respected. He just beleived that both races should stay in their own circles, both socially and maritally. I personally don't belleive that race should have anything to do with social practices, except for understanding that certain races are genetically more susceptible to certain diseases/abnormalities. I beleive that race is pretty much a nonentity. I think George Wallace was a great person on many issues, but not his racial views. In addition, after he was paralyzed, he had one of the most amazing conversion stories ever. Just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Dec 24, 2021 17:29:37 GMT
. That's a fair argument from Wallace, crime rate was high among blacks. Your source's conclusion is based on assumption that by "... deteriated to that of the Mongrel complexity", Wallace meant that blacks were inferior race. I don't think he meant that. 1. Are you serious. I think that is quite a racist comment. Crime rate was and still is high among African Americans, but as Gerd von Rundstedt said, it has nothing to do with their skin colour. 2. Not really, the source states that he thought "blacks were a separate and inferior race" and then gives an example on his thoughts on blacks in the form of a letter. I won't be arguing about sources though, I think that's just stupid in this case. Anyways, I think that opposing desegregation by attempting to prevent black students from entering a school is not only segregation but discrimination too. You don't need to be a KKK member killing blacks to be a racist. No matter whaf sources you believe he definitely fulfills my criteria of a racist and I wouldn't personally have him as my profile, but if the staff doesn't mind, then it's up to you. |
|
