|
|
Post by vuongpham on Sept 7, 2021 17:16:40 GMT
Hi. These are all my commanders. Which commander should I buy next?
- Genghis Khan 6*
- Washington 6*
- Nobunaga 6*
- Attila 5*
- Napoleon 6*
- Li Hon Zhang 5*
- Saladin 4*
- Hua Mu Lan 4*
- Moctezuma 4*
I plan to buy Blucher. I need your help. I don’t use English well. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Sept 7, 2021 17:21:26 GMT
I think Nelson is definitely who you should go for, as an Archer Commander.
|
|
|
|
Post by YDE on Sept 7, 2021 22:35:17 GMT
vuongpham, depends on the team you're going for. By the looks of it, it seems rather archer heavy so I agree with Manstein. Nelson will be a MAJOR help. If you can't afford him, Jhansi is also a good option. She may be frail, but she can pack a lot of power when inspiration is up. For CalvCom, I would say Edward, Asoka, or awakened Suri. Edward gets landships and had leadership and calvarly commander (fort heal as well), Asoka has calvarly commander, shelter (if I remember correctly), and inspiration, and Suri in awakened form has calvarly commander, inspiration, and braveness. Suri in awakened is frail and when I use her she doesn't do too much damage, but once those perks are activated, she'll be a beast like the others. Think of her as a frailer Attila.
|
|
|
|
Post by mayankshadow on Sept 8, 2021 0:31:33 GMT
I would not suggest according to ur current gens type. I would suggest in a sustainable way. U have all of them heavily costly so go with suri,petain(when the time comes) Barbarossa and bismark(dont make him 6star)
|
|
|
|
Post by mayankshadow on Sept 8, 2021 3:06:15 GMT
I suggest overall upgrading current gens is more important. So its ur choice
|
|
|
|
Post by vuongpham on Sept 8, 2021 4:17:54 GMT
every day i can earn 600 medals, 1 week is 4500 medals. so I'm thinking about Nelson, Richard, Lisimin, Ceasar, Blucher. Or use medals to upgrade skills for commanders and buy legendary equipment?
|
|
|
|
Post by mayankshadow on Sept 8, 2021 4:23:46 GMT
Plan it according to ur needs cause we suggest quite our type.
|
|
Chinese Player
First Lieutenant
Invited by Manstein, but even Manstein himself doesn't know who's using it.
Posts: 30 
|
Post by Chinese Player on Sept 12, 2021 7:14:07 GMT
Nelson，and more Archer Commander, Archer is better than rider in this game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Sept 12, 2021 12:58:00 GMT
Nelson，and more Archer Commander, Archer is better than rider in this game. Definitely on the first part, but I really don't like ArchCom. I get that many people use it very well, but on counters, they are as good as dead, very fragile, Attack is IMO the least important Characteristic, only 4 Commanders, &c. I don't think there can be a definitive statement that x is better than y. It all boils down to how you play. |
|
Chinese Player
First Lieutenant
Invited by Manstein, but even Manstein himself doesn't know who's using it.
Posts: 30
|
Post by Chinese Player on Sept 12, 2021 15:53:55 GMT
Nelson，and more Archer Commander, Archer is better than rider in this game. Definitely on the first part, but I really don't like ArchCom. I get that many people use it very well, but on counters, they are as good as dead, very fragile, Attack is IMO the least important Characteristic, only 4 Commanders, &c. I don't think there can be a definitive statement that x is better than y. It all boils down to how you play. rider is weak at auto, and it's hard to pass Greek 3 with it. |
|
|
|
Post by vuongpham on Sept 12, 2021 16:18:34 GMT
i passed greene trial 3 without using nelson. I don't think he's a very strong archcom. I like to use commanders with logistics skills. it helps to restore hp when killing the target, will have more advantage when the battle drags on.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Sept 12, 2021 17:17:11 GMT
Definitely on the first part, but I really don't like ArchCom. I get that many people use it very well, but on counters, they are as good as dead, very fragile, Attack is IMO the least important Characteristic, only 4 Commanders, &c. I don't think there can be a definitive statement that x is better than y. It all boils down to how you play. rider is weak at auto, and it's hard to pass Greek 3 with it. Yes, it is. But it can also constantly charge actives, and has decent stats everywhere. I don't like Cav, my unit of choice is infantry, due to amazing durability, surplus of commanders, a huge selection of great gens (in contrast to the other classes). |
|
Chinese Player
First Lieutenant
Invited by Manstein, but even Manstein himself doesn't know who's using it.
Posts: 30
|
Post by Chinese Player on Sept 12, 2021 23:52:54 GMT
Nelson，and more Archer Commander, Archer is better than rider in this game. Definitely on the first part, but I really don't like ArchCom. I get that many people use it very well, but on counters, they are as good as dead, very fragile, Attack is IMO the least important Characteristic, only 4 Commanders, &c. I don't think there can be a definitive statement that x is better than y. It all boils down to how you play. In fact，nearly all Chinese players use archer commander。they use France people to protect archer。 Rider is weak in some places，such as they play worse while aotu. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 13, 2021 6:13:53 GMT
As one former Chess World champion Tigran Petrosian said once: "there are only two styles of playing - a winning style and a loosing style"  It is definitely possible to succeed with all possible types of teams in this game. The most important thing is what are we planning to do with them. Even on auto it is possible to find solution of every riddle we face. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Sept 13, 2021 12:19:52 GMT
As one former Chess World champion Tigran Petrosian said once: "there are only two styles of playing - a winning style and a loosing style" It is definitely possible to succeed with all possible types of teams in this game. The most important thing is what are we planning to do with them. Even on auto it is possible to find solution of every riddle we face. That's the reason Good old Tiger is never remembered as one of the top ten greats. (no he was amazing, second [fourth?] only to IMO Kramnik, Vishy, and Lasker) But although ET games are much different than chess, I do agree that the same holds here, in a different way. There is certainly a bad, or good strategy, but there are much more ways to institute a good strategy. |
|
