|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2016 5:19:36 GMT
 Thiland defeated by WTO  1960 Iraq war is going well since Thailand has good cities to build rocket artillery so I waited for Australia to attack until it was not defended. Then took Thiland and they got knock out of the war by WTO. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Feb 22, 2016 5:30:34 GMT
I would do it
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Feb 22, 2016 5:43:41 GMT
It has a level 2 airport which is very nice to use paratrooper and you ally is really not going to do much most of the time so I would take the city.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2016 5:48:30 GMT
Thailand is easy prey
You wait, then go in for the kill
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Feb 22, 2016 7:06:59 GMT
i will do it except for france 1943, since you kill a lot of gens
|
|
|
|
Post by Singlemalt on Feb 22, 2016 10:25:06 GMT
ofc your ally AIs are often only a stand in the way
|
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Feb 22, 2016 12:15:24 GMT
Take their city so the enemies can not take it! |
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Feb 23, 2016 4:57:38 GMT
Yes, take the city in order to defend it!
Some cities that usually worth taking are Bangkok (as mention above), Khabarovsk, Budapest, Warsaw, and Berlin. These cities provide good productions and often implicitly ask for help by being empty.
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Feb 23, 2016 7:39:26 GMT
I have no problem with kicking down an ally from its last city in order to benefit from owning the city or being able to produce units from it. The only reason I would ever hesitate when an opportunity comes up: to benefit from the ally's generals or fortresses for a couple of turns. Ofc, you don't have to wait too long until those rare reasons goes away.  |
|
|
|
Post by Neltrase Vectore on Feb 23, 2016 14:30:34 GMT
Yes. Free resource (including small towns and oil fields) and no penalty for doing so (Unlike EW4 ). |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Feb 24, 2016 3:50:06 GMT
Since Thailand normally gets rekt in the beginning of every game, you should take it
|
|
|
|
Post by Neltrase Vectore on Feb 26, 2016 7:38:06 GMT
At least Thailand sacrifice all of its force to defend its capital, rather than this: Free Moscow from USSR.  |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Feb 26, 2016 9:32:45 GMT
At least Thailand sacrifice all of its force to defend its capital, rather than this: Free Moscow from USSR. 60 isn't it? XD |
|
|
|
Post by Neltrase Vectore on Feb 26, 2016 11:58:30 GMT
ayyyy  I have maxed out Ion cannon, so basically a free nuke every 3 turns. Ion + mobile inf = godlike X-P I'm cleaning up Soviet forces at Middle East and Asia currently. India and all middle east is under control. I was quite surprised to see my European allies held up and eventually eliminate almost all Soviet general, which bought me some time to storm Moscow and steal their super tanks. Btw, considering playing as a minor country in my first WC3 conquest things are going pretty well. I don't really expect to win below 65 turns at this stage  . |
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Feb 26, 2016 12:05:56 GMT
Even worse Denmark still survived.
|
|
Thiland defeated by WTO 
.
