|
|
Post by George Rudi on Oct 10, 2021 17:40:57 GMT
it doesn't matter if you are interested or not interested in ew6 1914, the point still stands, wc4 endgame doesn't even come close to ew6 1914 in terms of difficulty, i have only been playing for a week and i've already reached modern war with my limited generals, that's how much easier this game is compared to 1914. The fact that you did a conquest in 17 turns is impressive btw, but it shows how easy it is to just steamroll enemy when you have maxed generals and tech. It's the opposite in 1914 because maxing tech upgrades the enemy more than the upgrades ur units receive or ally countries. And that is just challenge conquests, some final levels in history modes are impossible no one to my knowledge has finished them. that's your opinion and i won't argue it, end of discussion here. It will be interesting to see how you progress later in this easier game. |
|
|
|
Post by George Rudi on Oct 10, 2021 17:42:41 GMT
Isn't speedrunning completing something as fast as possible? If your as fast as possible is faster than someone else's, doesn't remove the worth of his speedrunning. and who does remove the worth of his speedrunning? please don't make it worse. |
|
|
|
Post by torvestareturn on Oct 10, 2021 18:28:31 GMT
it doesn't matter if you are interested or not interested in ew6 1914, the point still stands, wc4 endgame doesn't even come close to ew6 1914 in terms of difficulty, i have only been playing for a week and i've already reached modern war with my limited generals, that's how much easier this game is compared to 1914. The fact that you did a conquest in 17 turns is impressive btw, but it shows how easy it is to just steamroll enemy when you have maxed generals and tech. It's the opposite in 1914 because maxing tech upgrades the enemy more than the upgrades ur units receive or ally countries. And that is just challenge conquests, some final levels in history modes are impossible no one to my knowledge has finished them. that's your opinion and i won't argue it, end of discussion here. It will be interesting to see how you progress later in this easier game. it's not an opinion tho, it's a fact based on the points i made about enemy becoming stronger if you improve your tech and no one being able to complete later missions in history mode and some challenge conquests (even tho i've managed to do belgium and tribal union challenge conquests which are the hardest), the only reason i'm playing wc4 is because i'm bored and tired of waiting for european war 7, not saying world conqueror isn't a good game but european war series is just better |
|
|
|
Post by Dorado St. Sebastian on Feb 16, 2022 20:24:29 GMT
Well, the game gets much harder in Modern warfare for sure. As do the domination challenges. ... I could add to many more things but, the proof is in the pudding.. please continue playing. I did extremely well early also.
Anyhow just wanted to point out my Gens' skills compared to your recommendations. Guderian and Roko are same as you listed except for:
Rommel has Rumor not Blitz
Konev has Explosives not PF
Leeb has Accuracy not CT
Donitz has Sailor not Explosives, he's pure Navy and should be going toe to toe with Modern War Naval Terrorists on Rocket Cruisers, taking ports, stopping spam.
Nimtz has Explosives instead of Depot. He can stick close to Donitz, clearing land base threats or softening up other units, wolf pack can help Nimitz in return.
Medals are much harder to come by for skill upgrades. None of mine are maxed, but am on Panama Canal Domination, and UN 4, Modern Warfare.
Regardless of all, I am happy to have seen the conversation between you, and both made good points. Being Nuked every few turns and blitzed by several, maxed skilled Gens, is a real part of this game... So heads up.
|
|
