|
|
Post by hrabrimalitoster on Oct 27, 2021 12:20:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 6, 2021 22:55:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Nov 7, 2021 4:44:13 GMT
Deleted, don't forget Saladin, Khalid and other Muslim commanders as well (in the context that the Crusades were a series of religious wars, so the religions of the commanders were used over their race/ethnicity). Good old Gungnir + Logistics Saladin carried my conquests once, can he carry them here as well? The two sides had famed commanders that fought in the Crusades and outside. I'm unsure about who can be the other named commanders on the Christian side, but Lionheart can't be the only one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2021 6:11:45 GMT
Deleted , don't forget Saladin, Khalid and other Muslim commanders as well (in the context that the Crusades were a series of religious wars, so the religions of the commanders were used over their race/ethnicity). Good old Gungnir + Logistics Saladin carried my conquests once, can he carry them here as well? The two sides had famed commanders that fought in the Crusades and outside. I'm unsure about who can be the other named commanders on the Christian side, but Lionheart can't be the only one. Same. I do know an asshat knight that Saladin straight up executed, but I forgot his name. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Nov 8, 2021 18:47:19 GMT
Um, I thoroughly enjoy the Crusades, and Khalid was NOT a Crusade general. The major ones were Richard, Guy of Lusignan (an idjit), Godfrey of Boullion, Baldwin 1-30, Philip II, Count Raymond of Toulouse, Louis IX, Frederick Barbarossa, Frederick II, the Doge of Venice, Conrad of Montferrat, Simon of Montfort, and Roger of Lauria (a jerk) for the Crusades. The Muslims had Saladin, Nur-ad-Din, Saphadin, and that's really it.
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Nov 13, 2021 18:23:27 GMT
Um, I thoroughly enjoy the Crusades, and Khalid was NOT a Crusade general. The major ones were Richard, Guy of Lusignan (an idjit), Godfrey of Boullion, Baldwin 1-30, Philip II, Count Raymond of Toulouse, Louis IX, Frederick Barbarossa, Frederick II, the Doge of Venice, Conrad of Montferrat, Simon of Montfort, and Roger of Lauria (a jerk) for the Crusades. The Muslims had Saladin, Nur-ad-Din, Saphadin, and that's really it. Actually there was one muslim general who is more prominent than Saladin. Namely the mamluk Sultan of Egypt Baibars. He's known not only for his decisive victories over Crusaders, but also as one of the victors over Mongols at Ain Jalut. |
|
|
|
Post by gladiator on Nov 14, 2021 23:09:34 GMT
Deleted, don't forget Saladin, Khalid and other Muslim commanders as well (in the context that the Crusades were a series of religious wars, so the religions of the commanders were used over their race/ethnicity). Good old Gungnir + Logistics Saladin carried my conquests once, can he carry them here as well? The two sides had famed commanders that fought in the Crusades and outside. I'm unsure about who can be the other named commanders on the Christian side, but Lionheart can't be the only one. they should add Baldwin the 4 in mask, would be really cool, besides, he was a good commander. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Nov 15, 2021 2:29:45 GMT
Um, I thoroughly enjoy the Crusades, and Khalid was NOT a Crusade general. The major ones were Richard, Guy of Lusignan (an idjit), Godfrey of Boullion, Baldwin 1-30, Philip II, Count Raymond of Toulouse, Louis IX, Frederick Barbarossa, Frederick II, the Doge of Venice, Conrad of Montferrat, Simon of Montfort, and Roger of Lauria (a jerk) for the Crusades. The Muslims had Saladin, Nur-ad-Din, Saphadin, and that's really it. Actually there was one muslim general who is more prominent than Saladin. Namely the mamluk Sultan of Egypt Baibars. He's known not only for his decisive victories over Crusaders, but also as one of the victors over Mongols at Ain Jalut. Yes, in hindsight it was very foolish and embarrassing of me not to include such an influential commander. He was not only known for his battlefield prowess but also his famed cruelty. Like, worse than Roger of Lauria, with whom he actually shares some interesting parallels. |
|
|
|
Post by zink on Nov 19, 2021 18:21:45 GMT
Deleted , don't forget Saladin, Khalid and other Muslim commanders as well (in the context that the Crusades were a series of religious wars, so the religions of the commanders were used over their race/ethnicity). Good old Gungnir + Logistics Saladin carried my conquests once, can he carry them here as well? The two sides had famed commanders that fought in the Crusades and outside. I'm unsure about who can be the other named commanders on the Christian side, but Lionheart can't be the only one. Same. I do know an asshat knight that Saladin straight up executed, but I forgot his name. Was it the story with the 2 dudes and Saladin making the other one give him water because Saladin wouldn't kill anybody who he's shown hospitality towards. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Nov 21, 2021 0:21:14 GMT
Same. I do know an asshat knight that Saladin straight up executed, but I forgot his name. Was it the story with the 2 dudes and Saladin making the other one give him water because Saladin wouldn't kill anybody who he's shown hospitality towards. That was about Roger of Lauria. |
|
|
|
Post by zink on Nov 21, 2021 2:43:41 GMT
Was it the story with the 2 dudes and Saladin making the other one give him water because Saladin wouldn't kill anybody who he's shown hospitality towards. That was about Roger of Lauria. Saladin and Roger weren't even alive at the same time It was Raynald of Châtillon I was also half mistaken in what I thought was the story. After the battle of Hattin Saladin offered Guy of Lusignan water (sign that he was safe from harm) but not Reynald and he gave him the choice of converting to Islam and when he refused Saladin beheaded him. Obviously Reynald would refuse, Saladin just wanted to kill him because like stated before he was an asshat. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Nov 22, 2021 2:43:02 GMT
That was about Roger of Lauria. Saladin and Roger weren't even alive at the same time It was Raynald of Châtillon I was also half mistaken in what I thought was the story. After the battle of Hattin Saladin offered Guy of Lusignan water (sign that he was safe from harm) but not Reynald and he gave him the choice of converting to Islam and when he refused Saladin beheaded him. Obviously Reynald would refuse, Saladin just wanted to kill him because like stated before he was an asshat. Got it, yeah. Sorry about that, they were both jerks, both major naval commanders, and their names started with an R. |
|
|
|
Post by KingButtAwl on Nov 22, 2021 16:35:13 GMT
They should add the italian “Baliano di Ibelin”.
|
|
