|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Feb 27, 2016 16:16:43 GMT
TBA
|
|
|
|
TW9 Rules
Mar 4, 2016 17:05:26 GMT
via mobile
Post by Archduke Charles on Mar 4, 2016 17:05:26 GMT
Uds
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Mar 5, 2016 6:35:52 GMT
WHEN IS THIS COMING ANYWAY?!?! (seriously)
|
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Mar 5, 2016 22:57:00 GMT
Rules of TW8: Colonies
1): Player-controlled countries CANNOT, I repeat CAN.NOT, be eliminated in less than 3 phases. Doesn't matter how much of a BA you're country is or how small the defender is, not happening.
2): NPCs (Non Player Countries(if any))can be overrun in less than 3 phases.
3): You can maintain 5 armies per province. If you are such a small country that you have one (not likely, but why not) you can maintain an extra army in your capital province. This bonus lasts as long as you control this province. The bonus does not apply if province is captured by another country.
To be continued, stop posting here!
|
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Mar 5, 2016 23:25:36 GMT
4): If country A's original provinces are taken by Country B, and Country C takes one of A's original provinces from B, C can liberate that province and Country A will return. This is optional. #NewFeature
5): If you have 30 armies compared to someone else's 2, and you both have the same technology OR you have better tech, it is only logical for something like a 2 or 3 to be required. Don't whine if this is a BS rule, I want to see blood and guts in this war. You better have a damn good reason for a 2,3, or 4, though. It will be determined what is acceptable as these battles occur.
6): No tech jumping.
7): You cannot have more troops than your provinces allow.
8): Ships amount to 3 armies.
9: You can make NAPs and Alliances on a whim, but you can be betrayed and treatys/pacts can be broken. Molotov-Ribbentrop, anyone?
10): If you do something I don't agree with, but you say it should be fine, there will be a vote. If I REAAAALLY have a bad feeling about it, though, I will veto it.
11): If you piss me off by talking back in a rude manner, or repeatedly break rules, there will be consequences, in the order of 1: warning, 2: temporary exile (1 or 2 phases) 3: temporary/permanent exile from the war. Permanent exile comes if the majority of people vote you should. Upon exile, your country will be given to any one currently not in the war who wants it. If there are no takers, the provinces become their own states.
|
|
|
|
TW9 Rules
Mar 5, 2016 23:29:31 GMT
via mobile
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Mar 5, 2016 23:29:31 GMT
That's all that I can think of right now. Any one have ideas?
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Mar 6, 2016 5:52:01 GMT
MOLOTOV-RIBBENTROP FECK YEAH MATE!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2016 19:52:10 GMT
I think if we have a NAP it must have a reason not to break it like if B attacks A, B will lose control of a border region(just an example).
As I said there must be a ground for every NAP so nobody want to kill it
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2016 19:56:08 GMT
There must be some kind of unions at the beggining and if you betray a union you are in war with it and allied with the union you took
|
|
|
|
TW9 Rules
Mar 6, 2016 19:57:33 GMT
via mobile
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Mar 6, 2016 19:57:33 GMT
I think if we have a NAP it must have a reason not to break it like if B attacks A, B will lose control of a border region(just an example). As I said there must be a ground for every NAP so nobody want to kill it Thats...not very realistic... |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Mar 6, 2016 20:23:48 GMT
I don't think the Union thing should be implemented because then that brings up the faction stuff again, which quite frankly I don't really like.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2016 20:30:08 GMT
I think if we have a NAP it must have a reason not to break it like if B attacks A, B will lose control of a border region(just an example). As I said there must be a ground for every NAP so nobody want to kill it Thats...not very realistic... It was like not about the getting land it was about if you sign a NAP you give it some ground as security that you wont break it |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2016 20:31:24 GMT
It would only give just something more realistic in it
|
|
|
|
TW9 Rules
Mar 6, 2016 20:57:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Mar 6, 2016 20:57:18 GMT
It would only give just something more realistic in it IIIIIIIIII don't think I'm gonna do something like that |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Mar 7, 2016 3:28:39 GMT
Von Bismarck jr I don't like the rule of breaking treaties on a whim. Back in TW2 and 3 we saw the amount of anger that came from betrayal. Just a tip.
|
|
