ZhuYuanzhang1328
First Lieutenant
If I have live few more years, expansion is the key.
Posts: 15
|
Post by ZhuYuanzhang1328 on Jan 27, 2022 14:01:54 GMT
I think that for each category there is a great general here is my opinion on the best for each category Infantry: Its Karl 100% the best a close second is surorov another great general Cavalry: No question Murat he is so OP if u can get a lot of weak enemys next to him he will get a great chain Artillery: Napoleon is the best for really any position apart from navy but his best is artillery a close second is Moreau also he is also great for infantry Navy: Jervis is amazing but Nelson, Sidney and Treville are great any of those is highly recommended Fortress: Massena is by far the best and he is also great for Infrantry and second is Kutuzov The most overrated one is Alexander he is so expensive and really not worth it Infantry, I would say Lannes is the best infantry general in EW4- Leadership, Mass Fire, other skills I forgot As Fortress, it's highly unlikely use fort general for war. |
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Jan 28, 2022 7:13:16 GMT
I think that for each category there is a great general here is my opinion on the best for each category Infantry: Its Karl 100% the best a close second is surorov another great general Cavalry: No question Murat he is so OP if u can get a lot of weak enemys next to him he will get a great chain Artillery: Napoleon is the best for really any position apart from navy but his best is artillery a close second is Moreau also he is also great for infantry Navy: Jervis is amazing but Nelson, Sidney and Treville are great any of those is highly recommended Fortress: Massena is by far the best and he is also great for Infrantry and second is Kutuzov The most overrated one is Alexander he is so expensive and really not worth it Infantry, I would say Lannes is the best infantry general in EW4- Leadership, Mass Fire, other skills I forgot As Fortress, it's highly unlikely use fort general for war. Lannes? 1 movement and no bugle are tough to overcome. Geography is wasted on infantry. Why not Victoria? She has 2 less attack stars but 3 more move stars- so she always will get one more hex on infantry. Skill wise you balance defense art and bugle vs leadership. Since morale drop acts as a penalty on defense, the skills are somewhat similar. It depends on how often Lannes will be flanking. Low movement makes leadership less useful. |
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Feb 5, 2022 16:11:34 GMT
Any emblem generals are expensive in real world money, so it's really difficult to recommend them. I agree, that paying real world money for badges, makes every Emblem General too expensive. But from the theoretical point of view: Assuming you have enough badges, what would be the best lineup for the 3 aviable HQ-commander I believe La Salle is my favorite for slot 4. I have no need for any Infantry specialist, so are there other IAP that are better than the free princess? |
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Feb 6, 2022 5:21:03 GMT
Any emblem generals are expensive in real world money, so it's really difficult to recommend them. I agree, that paying real world money for badges, makes every Emblem General too expensive. But from the theoretical point of view: Assuming you have enough badges, what would be the best lineup for the 3 aviable HQ-commander I believe La Salle is my favorite for slot 4. I have no need for any Infantry specialist, so are there other IAP that are better than the free princess? Good question! This one I'm not even sure about. Moreau/ La Salle/ Suvorov should all be "Best in Class" for Artillery/ Cav/ Infantry, but I'm not sure if that's the best set. Leadership for Cavalry is so good though! So maybe Lannes for the last slot. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Feb 6, 2022 7:49:21 GMT
Any emblem generals are expensive in real world money, so it's really difficult to recommend them. I agree, that paying real world money for badges, makes every Emblem General too expensive. But from the theoretical point of view: Assuming you have enough badges, what would be the best lineup for the 3 aviable HQ-commander I believe La Salle is my favorite for slot 4. I have no need for any Infantry specialist, so are there other IAP that are better than the free princess? If we set the cost aside, then only Fatimah and Maria will be overwhelmed by academy generals. There are quite a few IAP generals comparable to the princesses in different ways, such as Nelson, Dombrowski, Wellesley, etc... I can probably name 10. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Feb 6, 2022 7:53:57 GMT
I agree, that paying real world money for badges, makes every Emblem General too expensive. But from the theoretical point of view: Assuming you have enough badges, what would be the best lineup for the 3 aviable HQ-commander I believe La Salle is my favorite for slot 4. I have no need for any Infantry specialist, so are there other IAP that are better than the free princess? Good question! This one I'm not even sure about. Moreau/ La Salle/ Suvorov should all be "Best in Class" for Artillery/ Cav/ Infantry, but I'm not sure if that's the best set. Leadership for Cavalry is so good though! So maybe Lannes for the last slot. Finishing with that slow Lannes? No way! I do agree with ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ that in a 4 slot lineup there's no space for an infantry specialist; however, I'd appreciate an infantry-cavalry hybrid. For an all-IAP lineup, Moreau and Nelson will definitely be there, and perhaps Archduke and Lasalle? |
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Feb 7, 2022 3:04:00 GMT
I thought about Nelson too. He at least covers you on Naval missions too.
|
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Feb 7, 2022 17:19:44 GMT
Good question! This one I'm not even sure about. Moreau/ La Salle/ Suvorov should all be "Best in Class" for Artillery/ Cav/ Infantry, but I'm not sure if that's the best set. Leadership for Cavalry is so good though! So maybe Lannes for the last slot. Finishing with that slow Lannes? No way! I do agree with ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ that in a 4 slot lineup there's no space for an infantry specialist; however, I'd appreciate an infantry-cavalry hybrid. For an all-IAP lineup, Moreau and Nelson will definitely be there, and perhaps Archduke and Lasalle?Β I noticed that it is not easy - aparty La Salle for slot 4 (5β cav, 5 movement, all cav skills + sailor - no training). But the other, Nelson, Moreau and Karl (Archduke C) - Compared with Lan, Isabella and Sakurako, for an edgame lineup, apart for navy stars, I don't see an real advantage of the IAP. Maybe as starter ( and there can be even Lames useful ) In the end, generals are skilled for their role in the gameplay - not for the headquarter. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Feb 7, 2022 19:22:09 GMT
Finishing with that slow Lannes? No way! I do agree with ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ that in a 4 slot lineup there's no space for an infantry specialist; however, I'd appreciate an infantry-cavalry hybrid. For an all-IAP lineup, Moreau and Nelson will definitely be there, and perhaps Archduke and Lasalle? I noticed that it is not easy - aparty La Salle for slot 4 (5β cav, 5 movement, all cav skills + sailor - no training). But the other, Nelson, Moreau and Karl (Archduke C) - Compared with Lan, Isabella and Sakurako, for an edgame lineup, apart for navy stars, I don't see an real advantage of the IAP. Maybe as starter ( and there can be even Lames useful ) In the end, generals are skilled for their role in the gameplay - not for the headquarter. None of them are strictly better than a princess, but they do offer some varieties. Nelson, Wellesley, and Davout are some of the best examples. |
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Feb 8, 2022 21:20:58 GMT
I noticed that it is not easy - aparty La Salle for slot 4 (5β cav, 5 movement, all cav skills + sailor - no training). But the other, Nelson, Moreau and Karl (Archduke C) - Compared with Lan, Isabella and Sakurako, for an edgame lineup, apart for navy stars, I don't see an real advantage of the IAP. Maybe as starter ( and there can be even Lames useful ) In the end, generals are skilled for their role in the gameplay - not for the headquarter. None of them are strictly better than a princess, but they do offer some varieties. Nelson, Wellesley, and Davout are some of the best examples. The game offers quite a lot reasonable lineups, but I was amazed that there is not an 'obvious' IAP lineup much better than the princess. La Salle was easy to choose, but there overall only 3 out of 208 commander that come with 5 β movement (LaSalle, Dearborn as IAP and and Exelmans) so practical everyone needs trainers, except him. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Feb 9, 2022 0:14:50 GMT
None of them are strictly better than a princess, but they do offer some varieties. Nelson, Wellesley, and Davout are some of the best examples. The game offers quite a lot reasonable lineups, but I was amazed that there is not an 'obvious' IAP lineup much better than the princess. La Salle was easy to choose, but there overall only 3 out of 208 commander that come with 5 β movement (LaSalle, Dearborn as IAP and and Exelmans) so practical everyone needs trainers, except him. easytech always make some F2P generals so good that they can even compete with the IAPs. If you take the princesses away, then the only academy general that can certainly qualify this standard is Berthier. |
|
|
|
Post by Ludwig von Mises on Feb 10, 2022 3:56:05 GMT
Iβve also found Ney pretty good
|
|
