|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2016 1:12:29 GMT
I saw this in the Russian Forms   |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Mar 9, 2016 2:58:44 GMT
I don't get it. What's so special?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Mar 9, 2016 3:13:34 GMT
I don't get it. What's so special? The lack of units? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Mar 9, 2016 3:22:17 GMT
I don't get it. What's so special? It's pretty much a map of Europe showing only the cities and land |
|
|
|
Post by Conner Mcdave on Mar 9, 2016 14:32:51 GMT
I don't get it. What's so special? Look the the amount of cities to conquest and that will be a long one. |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Mar 9, 2016 15:35:41 GMT
the amount of cities is the same, but all the cities have names in this version
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Mar 9, 2016 15:36:19 GMT
the amount of cities is the same, but all the cities have names in this version
|
|
|
|
Post by batman on Mar 10, 2016 0:58:25 GMT
the amount of cities is the same, but all the cities have names in this version Communist can you show an apk lino on the Russian forms. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Mar 10, 2016 1:16:43 GMT
I don't see any cities I haven't seen before though NetherFreek |
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Mar 13, 2016 9:49:16 GMT
Too many, why they are very easy to conquer only 1 unit defending the plot. Its not too much when you see it this way. In EW3, 4 stacked units can protect a city, now thats what I call "hard conquest".
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2016 10:40:50 GMT
Many Citis long conquest and huge fighting
|
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Mar 13, 2016 20:14:39 GMT
Oh yeah stacked units that sucked capturing it. The city literally could stop all your offensives.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Mar 13, 2016 22:59:37 GMT
I like that there's a lot of cities. Less forts to fight and more health for my troops
|
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Mar 13, 2016 23:00:47 GMT
And more easy money.
|
|
