|
Post by loliconsmustdie on Jul 18, 2022 7:55:51 GMT
As all we've known the "track skill" make 50% damage for Cav against archers, making archers not as superior as before whwn fighting against Cav,has anyone begun to abandon Archer Commander and turn into Cav Commander as an result?
|
|
|
Post by jonblend on Jul 18, 2022 21:41:20 GMT
Attacking from range is still their biggest advantage imo. You have a lot more freedom in how to position them and it avoids a lot of counterattack damage and debuffs.
|
|
|
Post by YDE on Jul 20, 2022 3:45:05 GMT
As all we've known the "track skill" make 50% damage for Cav against archers, making archers not as superior as before when fighting against Cav,has anyone begun to abandon Archer Commander and turn into Cav Commander as an result? I agree with jonblend , range makes arch com teams the best imo. Even if cavalry now combats archers, there are a small % of archers who oppose cavalry, like Moctezuma. Even without Moctezuma's anti-cavalry perk, leadership is abundant many my top tier archers, and one hit from leadership and enemy generals are way easier to combat. It won't be long for the enemy tanks to be destroyed. Now, generals like Saladin or Charlemange are a different story, as they are anti-archer in both respects, but again, range and leadership come to archers' aid. No team composition is obsolete, each has their advantage and disadvantages, but definitely cavalry and archers remain as 2 of the best teams. Even infantry has a bit of ground against the two, with their chance for mobility. Who knows where possible new updates might take us, but I am 100% certain ET will make sure the game is balanced so no one unit is better than another.
|
|