|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Dec 3, 2022 22:17:51 GMT
I suggest you lower your hypocrisy levels and let France deal with an actual threat. France lost 40,000 valiant men fighting for the freedom of Albania against Italy and we will make sure their blood was not spilled for nothing. Your forces in illegally occupied Yugoslavia greatly outnumber ours in Albania, so there is no threat to your empire. I am not illegal occupying Yugoslavia, the country of Yugoslavia has been returned to its rightful place in the empire. And as I mentioned before if Albania were to actually be a threat I would have my forces eliminate said threat. However I've seen no reason for this invasion. If you can give me a good reason then I will allow it, and even use my forces to assist in this liberation. Some in Albania have close ties with Italy, which invaded it in our previous war. In that war 40,000 French died in Albania and I have to occupy it before Italy can do it again when the 40,000 lost lives will have been wasted without a reason. I hope you see that my invasion is atleast just as justified as yours and it has nothing to do with your sphere of influence.
|
|
|
Post by Warlord247 on Dec 3, 2022 23:27:13 GMT
I am not illegal occupying Yugoslavia, the country of Yugoslavia has been returned to its rightful place in the empire. And as I mentioned before if Albania were to actually be a threat I would have my forces eliminate said threat. However I've seen no reason for this invasion. If you can give me a good reason then I will allow it, and even use my forces to assist in this liberation. Some in Albania have close ties with Italy, which invaded it in our previous war. In that war 40,000 French died in Albania and I have to occupy it before Italy can do it again when the 40,000 lost lives will have been wasted without a reason. I hope you see that my invasion is atleast just as justified as yours and it has nothing to do with your sphere of influence. I cannot support your actions, as they are based on speculation, but I will not hinder them, as I understand your reasoning.
|
|
|
Post by Theron of Acragas on Dec 4, 2022 0:10:15 GMT
Some in Albania have close ties with Italy, which invaded it in our previous war. In that war 40,000 French died in Albania and I have to occupy it before Italy can do it again when the 40,000 lost lives will have been wasted without a reason. I hope you see that my invasion is atleast just as justified as yours and it has nothing to do with your sphere of influence. I cannot support your actions, as they are based on speculation, but I will not hinder them, as I understand your reasoning. Can't we all just get along? Italy, of course, most strongly protests this unprovoked and unjustifiable aggression against a friendly state. An Italian occupation of Albania (were such a thing intended) poses no threat to French interests. Nor can the French claims be taken seriously, justified as they are with the logic of a man who, to save his friend from an attempt on his life, shoots him in the head. In fact the only possible reason for a French interest in Albania is to pursue its strategic interests against Austria. Italy calls for both of these countries to withdraw their forces from the occupied countries. Too much blood has already flowed into the Adriatic.
|
|
|
Post by Theron of Acragas on Dec 4, 2022 0:15:11 GMT
Only for Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov , I see what you meant in your previous message. Italy is indeed greatly concerned by the behavior of our neighbors to the east and agrees that this aggression needs to be stopped. Do we have a plan of action?
By the way, have my factories been producing all this time and has there been any recruiting? Only for Theron of Acragas The USSR wrote me a message filled with paranoia and disrespect even though it it is obvious to everybody that it is clearly betraying our alliance with Austria-Hungary. Still we need to do things discreetly. I hope you understand that the two most dangerous countries are Austria-Hungary and the USSR. If the former comes to its senses I don't wish any hostilities with them, but Austria-Hungary has to go. As I said we can't be open about this and I will firstly take Austria-Hungary on my own. If it starts to look like I'll lose you'll have to help. If I get into war with the USSR, you can openly join.
I see you have been talking with Austria-Hungary and it may seem a natural ally to you, but trust me, it is not an ally it is a parasite that uses other countries to advantage and destroys them afterwards. They seem to be already making treaties with the USSR and Poland and there will be no room for you in that alliance. If you don't believe me and warn Austria-Hungary, you will soon see Northern Italy lost. If you decide to join me, you will regain your lost lands in the Adriatic sea region.'
Edit: If you see this, I invaded Albania and accused you to justify it, but it was just to have a reason to assert military presence in the Balkans.
Only for Kliment Jefremovitš VorošilovI've been talking to Austria, but it's been more polite than friendly, Sir Kent has made a claim on some Italian lands which he refuses to renounce, and it's proving a barrier to negotiations.
I understood why you went for Albania, of course. I meant to do it myself 😂
|
|
|
Post by Warlord247 on Dec 4, 2022 2:55:21 GMT
Theron of Acragas, Austro-Hungaria "leaving its occupied countries" is not a possibility. They are the original land of the empire, and have been reinvigorated accordingly. I do agree now that France's interest seem very skewed, and I ask the question, wouldn't you be fighting revolutionaries Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov, not the Albanian military itself?. I will once again, firmly ask you to leave Albania.
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Dec 4, 2022 8:23:55 GMT
Only for Theron of Acragas The USSR wrote me a message filled with paranoia and disrespect even though it it is obvious to everybody that it is clearly betraying our alliance with Austria-Hungary. Still we need to do things discreetly. I hope you understand that the two most dangerous countries are Austria-Hungary and the USSR. If the former comes to its senses I don't wish any hostilities with them, but Austria-Hungary has to go. As I said we can't be open about this and I will firstly take Austria-Hungary on my own. If it starts to look like I'll lose you'll have to help. If I get into war with the USSR, you can openly join.
I see you have been talking with Austria-Hungary and it may seem a natural ally to you, but trust me, it is not an ally it is a parasite that uses other countries to advantage and destroys them afterwards. They seem to be already making treaties with the USSR and Poland and there will be no room for you in that alliance. If you don't believe me and warn Austria-Hungary, you will soon see Northern Italy lost. If you decide to join me, you will regain your lost lands in the Adriatic sea region.'
Edit: If you see this, I invaded Albania and accused you to justify it, but it was just to have a reason to assert military presence in the Balkans.
Only for Kliment Jefremovitš VorošilovI've been talking to Austria, but it's been more polite than friendly, Sir Kent has made a claim on some Italian lands which he refuses to renounce, and it's proving a barrier to negotiations.
I understood why you went for Albania, of course. I meant to do it myself 😂 Only for Theron of AcragasAlright. I mainly went for Albania myself, because I thought it would provoke a smaller reaction if I did it. If you had done I would have had to declare war on you if I wanted to avoid accusations from the USSR.
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Dec 4, 2022 8:43:31 GMT
Theron of Acragas, Austro-Hungaria "leaving its occupied countries" is not a possibility. They are the original land of the empire, and have been reinvigorated accordingly. I do agree now that France's interest seem very skewed, and I ask the question, wouldn't you be fighting revolutionaries Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov, not the Albanian military itself?. I will once again, firmly ask you to leave Albania. I propose to only occupy Tirana and the nearby regions. I will get control of the country, but there won't be a threat to you.
|
|
|
Post by Warlord247 on Dec 4, 2022 9:10:43 GMT
Theron of Acragas , Austro-Hungaria "leaving its occupied countries" is not a possibility. They are the original land of the empire, and have been reinvigorated accordingly. I do agree now that France's interest seem very skewed, and I ask the question, wouldn't you be fighting revolutionaries Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov , not the Albanian military itself?. I will once again, firmly ask you to leave Albania. I propose to only occupy Tirana and the nearby regions. I will get control of the country, but there won't be a threat to you. I will accept this occupation, however on one condition: once whatever rebellion in Albania has been put down, King Zog is returned to power, and French troops do not continue occupation.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene V. Debs on Dec 4, 2022 11:16:48 GMT
Only for Warlord247Seemingly, France has clearly betrayed me and Poland, and seems to have been allied with Italy, the fascists, because of their floods of talks for pages, and I cannot accept this no matter what. As I've said in our previous talks, the most important obstacle to an alliance between us was that I am against betrayals unless there are very special conditions. But now, France is the side that has betrayed and I do not have a connection with them any more. Therefore, there's no obstacle between an alliance between us now, and I will be honoured to do so.
The only thing is, I am still allied with Poland and I respect alliances unlike France, as you have seen in our previous talks when I rejected betraying because I had already been allied with others. Therefore, now, I would like to propose an alliance between the three of us, you, I and Poland against fascists, France and any other threats. My only condition is that Poland joins us, so we should convince them too.
Also, this alliance must be pro-socialist, even if not totally socialist (since you will still continue being monarchist for now).
|
|
|
Post by Warlord247 on Dec 4, 2022 11:37:54 GMT
Only for Warlord247 Seemingly, France has clearly betrayed me and Poland, and seems to have been allied with Italy, the fascists, because of their floods of talks for pages, and I cannot accept this no matter what. As I've said in our previous talks, the most important obstacle to an alliance between us was that I am against betrayals unless there are very special conditions. But now, France is the side that has betrayed and I do not have a connection with them any more. Therefore, there's no obstacle between an alliance between us now, and I will be honoured to do so.
The only thing is, I am still allied with Poland and I respect alliances unlike France, as you have seen in our previous talks when I rejected betraying because I had already been allied with others. Therefore, now, I would like to propose an alliance between the three of us, you, I and Poland against fascists, France and any other threats. My only condition is that Poland joins us, so we should convince them too.
Also, this alliance must be pro-socialist, even if not totally socialist (since you will still continue being monarchist for now). Charles only I accept all of your conditions good friend! While the circumstances are unfortunate, I am glad that am alliance between us has finally come to fruition.
When it comes to battle, we could either fight a war of attrition, with you and Poland invading Italy through my Southern border, and me holding off the French at the Habsburg line (since the Maginot is impenetrable) or I could instead invade through the Benealux, have Poland defend against the Maginot, and have you invade Italy. Let me know which plan sounds best so I can further elaborate.
Sincerely, Sir Kent, King of Austria-Hungary
|
|
|
Post by Eugene V. Debs on Dec 4, 2022 11:48:42 GMT
Only for Warlord247 Seemingly, France has clearly betrayed me and Poland, and seems to have been allied with Italy, the fascists, because of their floods of talks for pages, and I cannot accept this no matter what. As I've said in our previous talks, the most important obstacle to an alliance between us was that I am against betrayals unless there are very special conditions. But now, France is the side that has betrayed and I do not have a connection with them any more. Therefore, there's no obstacle between an alliance between us now, and I will be honoured to do so.
The only thing is, I am still allied with Poland and I respect alliances unlike France, as you have seen in our previous talks when I rejected betraying because I had already been allied with others. Therefore, now, I would like to propose an alliance between the three of us, you, I and Poland against fascists, France and any other threats. My only condition is that Poland joins us, so we should convince them too.
Also, this alliance must be pro-socialist, even if not totally socialist (since you will still continue being monarchist for now). Charles only I accept all of your conditions good friend! While the circumstances are unfortunate, I am glad that am alliance between us has finally come to fruition.
When it comes to battle, we could either fight a war of attrition, with you and Poland invading Italy through my Southern border, and me holding off the French at the Habsburg line (since the Maginot is impenetrable) or I could instead invade through the Benealux, have Poland defend against the Maginot, and have you invade Italy. Let me know which plan sounds best so I can further elaborate.
Sincerely, Sir Kent, King of Austria-Hungary Only for Warlord247That's nice to hear, and I'm honoured to finally start collaborating with you, Sir Kent, no matter how grim the circumstances in Europe (betrayals etc.) are. And I am sure that this will benefit us all.
Then, I will inform Poland about this, and as soon as they accept too, we can formally declare this alliance. And then we can talk about the war plans, because Poland might have something to say as well, and meanwhile I will think too, if these are okay with you as well.
|
|
|
Post by Warlord247 on Dec 4, 2022 11:54:56 GMT
Charles only I accept all of your conditions good friend! While the circumstances are unfortunate, I am glad that am alliance between us has finally come to fruition.
When it comes to battle, we could either fight a war of attrition, with you and Poland invading Italy through my Southern border, and me holding off the French at the Habsburg line (since the Maginot is impenetrable) or I could instead invade through the Benealux, have Poland defend against the Maginot, and have you invade Italy. Let me know which plan sounds best so I can further elaborate.
Sincerely, Sir Kent, King of Austria-Hungary Only for Warlord247 That's nice to hear, and I'm honoured to finally start collaborating with you, Sir Kent, no matter how grim the circumstances in Europe (betrayals etc.) are. And I am sure that this will benefit us all.
Then, I will inform Poland about this, and as soon as they accept too, we can formally declare this alliance. And then we can talk about the war plans, because Poland might have something to say as well, and meanwhile I will think too, if these are okay with you as well. Charles only That's perfectly acceptable. To the alliance of the future!
|
|
|
Post by Eugene V. Debs on Dec 4, 2022 13:20:53 GMT
Only for Darth NihilusSo, France is invading Albania, they've been talking with Italy for pages and they rejected giving me an explanation about their suspicious actions and reacted agressively, and they did not inform you either, although we are both its allies. And they have not talked with us for pages and pages. So, it is clear that France has betrayed us and it is no longer ally with us. So, only you and me has remained as allies and turned out to be loyal to each other in the end, dear friend.
However, although France is no longer an ally of ours, you and I are still allied and I will continue this alliance, unlike the traitors like France. However, we need a replacement for France. And I have been talking Austria-Hungary about this. They proposed me an alliance before, but I rejected because I had been allied with you and France and I didn't want to betray (unlike France, I am against betrayals and I will protect my allies no matter what, and this was what I told Austria-Hungary back then) Though, we agreed on not to cut diplomatic channels even though I rejected betraying to anyone. And they respected my choice. And I appreciate this. As you may have realised as well, while the others were always agressive, two of us always managed to get on well with Austria-Hungary. They peacefully accepted my proposal for the distribution of Romania, and from what they told me, I understand that Austria-Hungary and you have agreed on the matter of Czechoslovakia in a peaceful way. So, I am happy that I've trusted them from the beginning and continued our diplomatic relationship in a peaceful way. And your relationship with them has been like mine too, as far as I know and what I can tell from what Austria-Hungary told me. All three of us can manage being logical and peaceful no matter what circumtances are, unlike France and Italy.
Therefore, now I sent Austria-Hungary an invation to an alliance between me, them and you and we have agreed on this alliance. My conditions for this allince that you join too (because I will not betray you no matter what happens, unlike France) and that this alliance must be pro-socialist. Sir Kent says that Austria-Hungary will join me, the socialists, after his reign ends, so he is already pro-socialist, and hopefully totally socialist in the future, although now he is only has a pro-socialist stance. And I want you to have a pro-socialist stance too.
The only thing we need now is, naturally, your approval to this invitation to form this alliance which will consist of Austria-Hungary, you and me. Both of us are waiting for your reply now, and then everything is ready.
So, do you accept my invitation to an alliance between the three of us, you me and them, against the threat of Italy and France?
|
|
|
Post by Theron of Acragas on Dec 4, 2022 14:10:07 GMT
Only for Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov I've been talking to Austria, but it's been more polite than friendly, Sir Kent has made a claim on some Italian lands which he refuses to renounce, and it's proving a barrier to negotiations.
I understood why you went for Albania, of course. I meant to do it myself 😂 Only for Theron of Acragas Alright. I mainly went for Albania myself, because I thought it would provoke a smaller reaction if I did it. If you had done I would have had to declare war on you if I wanted to avoid accusations from the USSR. Only for Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov , How does the USSR even come into this?
In any case, I was intending to propose a restructuring of our peace treaty. It doesn't allow Italy to take any offensive actions, which is a major problem given the new threat of Austria, and in theory anything I do means fighting both of you. I therefore propose the following arrangement:
Italy commits not to fortify its borders with France, or to place heavy equipment close to France or French territories (unchanged from before).
Italy withdraws its other treaty commitments. Any foreign interventions, excluding France, its possessions and its allies, will not be considered treaty violations, and Italy is free to fortify its borders with other nations.
Italy withdraws its protest and publicly recognizes the French occupation of Albania as legitimate.
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Dec 4, 2022 14:31:17 GMT
Only for Theron of Acragas Alright. I mainly went for Albania myself, because I thought it would provoke a smaller reaction if I did it. If you had done I would have had to declare war on you if I wanted to avoid accusations from the USSR. Only for Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov , How does the USSR even come into this?
In any case, I was intending to propose a restructuring of our peace treaty. It doesn't allow Italy to take any offensive actions, which is a major problem given the new threat of Austria, and in theory anything I do means fighting both of you. I therefore propose the following arrangement:
Italy commits not to fortify its borders with France, or to place heavy equipment close to France or French territories (unchanged from before).
Italy withdraws its other treaty commitments. Any foreign interventions, excluding France, its possessions and its allies, will not be considered treaty violations, and Italy is free to fortify its borders with other nations.
Italy withdraws its protest and publicly recognizes the French occupation of Albania as legitimate. Only for Theron of AcragasI agree on all pounts, but I want to write this down more clearly.
1. As was agreed on the previous treaty, Italy will not place any troops closer than 300 km of the French border in the Alps.
2. Italy can militarise its borders and engage in foreign wars excluding any of France's territories, colonies, protectorates and occupied territory. Italy will not interfere in Spain and it has to inform beforehand if it wants to wage war on a France's neighbour.
3. Italy will not publicly protest any French wars, unless of course they are against Italy.
|
|