|
|
Post by meisterdelav on Oct 30, 2022 18:48:41 GMT
Ik for the long run EC has more potential but Sikorski is useful for most battles u will encounter right? Like the extra potential for EC doesnt seem to be very crucial but definitely costs a lot? Anyone wanna go in detail comparing the two? Thxxx
|
|
|
|
Post by Luigi Sansonetti on Oct 31, 2022 5:11:06 GMT
Sikorski: High damage, high mobility, but low HP. Costs 1845 medals
Custom Artillery General that costs 1850 medals: Major (480), 3 star artilley (350), 3 star mobility (340), Lvl 2 Plain Fighting 290, Lvl 2 Art. Barrage (310), Lvl 1 Explosives (80).
Low HP as Sikorski, almost the same dmg (28 vs 16 + 10 on plains), but Custom Artillery General has Lvl 1 Explosives. Sikorski is more mobile but would you make him go far away from other units considering he has low HP? Desperate skill? Not reliable against artilleries, Blitzkrieg and air strikes.
|
|
|
|
Post by meisterdelav on Oct 31, 2022 23:35:51 GMT
Sikorski: High damage, high mobility, but low HP. Costs 1845 medals Custom Artillery General that costs 1850 medals: Major (480), 3 star artilley (350), 3 star mobility (340), Lvl 2 Plain Fighting 290, Lvl 2 Art. Barrage (310), Lvl 1 Explosives (80). Low HP as Sikorski, almost the same dmg (28 vs 16 + 10 on plains), but Custom Artillery General has Lvl 1 Explosives. Sikorski is more mobile but would you make him go far away from other units considering he has low HP? Desperate skill? Not reliable against artilleries, Blitzkrieg and air strikes. Sikorski is actually +30 damage for artillery plus better artillery barrage, extra artillery leader and not dependant on terrain. In terms of future development if we want better Sikorski we can up rank Sikorski which takes 200 and then 300. If air strike is big deal then Sikorski also has shelter expert. Sikorski also doubles as a minor air general with minor economic improvement with desperate still having some affect. |
|
|
|
Post by Luigi Sansonetti on Nov 1, 2022 3:04:29 GMT
Sikorski: High damage, high mobility, but low HP. Costs 1845 medals Custom Artillery General that costs 1850 medals: Major (480), 3 star artilley (350), 3 star mobility (340), Lvl 2 Plain Fighting 290, Lvl 2 Art. Barrage (310), Lvl 1 Explosives (80). Low HP as Sikorski, almost the same dmg (28 vs 16 + 10 on plains), but Custom Artillery General has Lvl 1 Explosives. Sikorski is more mobile but would you make him go far away from other units considering he has low HP? Desperate skill? Not reliable against artilleries, Blitzkrieg and air strikes. Sikorski is actually +30 damage for artillery plus better artillery barrage, extra artillery leader and not dependant on terrain. In terms of future development if we want better Sikorski we can up rank Sikorski which takes 200 and then 300. If air strike is big deal then Sikorski also has shelter expert. Sikorski also doubles as a minor air general with minor economic improvement with desperate still having some affect. The description actually lies, it ain't 30 damage for 5 stars. Artillery Leader ain't powerful, you know. It's one of the worst skill to have in WC3. There are many threads here pointing towards to how bad Leader skill is. Also, there are no nukes in alien campaigns. Getting nuked in Cold War means assured death to a general anyways, so Shelter ain't a plus for me. Speaking of air general, I could deploy him in Japan 1975 in the defense of Tokyo against aliens. That is why I hired Sikorski as my 4th infantry general. It is still up to you if you want artillery EC or Sikorski as your third artillery general. Either way, I prefer them over Konev. |
|
|
|
Post by meisterdelav on Nov 1, 2022 13:21:52 GMT
Sikorski is actually +30 damage for artillery plus better artillery barrage, extra artillery leader and not dependant on terrain. In terms of future development if we want better Sikorski we can up rank Sikorski which takes 200 and then 300. If air strike is big deal then Sikorski also has shelter expert. Sikorski also doubles as a minor air general with minor economic improvement with desperate still having some affect. The description actually lies, it ain't 30 damage for 5 stars. Artillery Leader ain't powerful, you know. It's one of the worst skill to have in WC3. There are many threads here pointing towards to how bad Leader skill is. Also, there are no nukes in alien campaigns. Getting nuked in Cold War means assured death to a general anyways, so Shelter ain't a plus for me. Speaking of air general, I could deploy him in Japan 1975 in the defense of Tokyo against aliens. That is why I hired Sikorski as my 4th infantry general. It is still up to you if you want artillery EC or Sikorski as your third artillery general. Either way, I prefer them over Konev. Ah I see, understood, so I assume u went with EC and Bai for ur 2nd and 3rd art general correct? How do u like that so far? And are you going with 4 art and 2 tank for 1975 Tokyo then? |
|
|
|
Post by Luigi Sansonetti on Nov 1, 2022 17:06:30 GMT
The description actually lies, it ain't 30 damage for 5 stars. Artillery Leader ain't powerful, you know. It's one of the worst skill to have in WC3. There are many threads here pointing towards to how bad Leader skill is. Also, there are no nukes in alien campaigns. Getting nuked in Cold War means assured death to a general anyways, so Shelter ain't a plus for me. Speaking of air general, I could deploy him in Japan 1975 in the defense of Tokyo against aliens. That is why I hired Sikorski as my 4th infantry general. It is still up to you if you want artillery EC or Sikorski as your third artillery general. Either way, I prefer them over Konev. Ah I see, understood, so I assume u went with EC and Bai for ur 2nd and 3rd art general correct? How do u like that so far? And are you going with 4 art and 2 tank for 1975 Tokyo then? I have arty EC for 2nd and third arty gens. I am hoarding a lot of medals since I am too busy, so I might hire Bai and Weidling as my 5th and 6th arty after I upgrade my generals. I really want to have 5-6 arty gens for farming alien conquests. I go for 1 tank, 5 arty (with 1 air ) in Japan 1975. |
|
