Post by General William T. Sherman on May 27, 2015 23:46:27 GMT
For those of you you haven't played World Conqueror 3 yet due to the long wait for the android release, this thread is for some comparison between GoG (both versions) and WC3. This will also include my personal opinion about which one is better for each category of comparison.
1.Graphics:
In GoG, there's more of a realistic/gritty type of graphics (at least compared to WC3). The units are altogether realistic looking. In WC3, however, the graphics look more like European War 4 graphics, i.e, kind of cartoony and not realistic looking. This category is really a matter of preference, and for me, I like the WC3 graphics more.
2.Units
This category is kind of tricky as both games have virtually the same units pretty much. The only exceptions being the commando in WC3, which can shoot rockets and deal heavy damage to armour, and the scout in GoG, which reveals more of the enemy. All though the commando is a really good troop, the scout is also very helpful for GoG, allowing you to see what troops the enemy has. The commando is a better troop in my opinion, however, than the scout. Even though WC3 takes the cake here in my opinion, it's virtually a tie because both games have virtually the same units.
3.Conquest Mode
This category is no contest, World Conqueror 3. In World Conqueror 3, you have the entire world to fight in, including the six main continents. Not to mention you can control the entire nation instead of having to choose a specific commander for a specific area of the country. Also, you can see your enemy, which is a necessity in conquest in my opinion. All together, I just found conquest mode a lot more fun in WC3 than in GoG.
1.Graphics:
In GoG, there's more of a realistic/gritty type of graphics (at least compared to WC3). The units are altogether realistic looking. In WC3, however, the graphics look more like European War 4 graphics, i.e, kind of cartoony and not realistic looking. This category is really a matter of preference, and for me, I like the WC3 graphics more.
2.Units
This category is kind of tricky as both games have virtually the same units pretty much. The only exceptions being the commando in WC3, which can shoot rockets and deal heavy damage to armour, and the scout in GoG, which reveals more of the enemy. All though the commando is a really good troop, the scout is also very helpful for GoG, allowing you to see what troops the enemy has. The commando is a better troop in my opinion, however, than the scout. Even though WC3 takes the cake here in my opinion, it's virtually a tie because both games have virtually the same units.
3.Conquest Mode
This category is no contest, World Conqueror 3. In World Conqueror 3, you have the entire world to fight in, including the six main continents. Not to mention you can control the entire nation instead of having to choose a specific commander for a specific area of the country. Also, you can see your enemy, which is a necessity in conquest in my opinion. All together, I just found conquest mode a lot more fun in WC3 than in GoG.
.jpg)
