|
Post by pevertpanda on Jan 22, 2024 1:26:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by journeykeen on Jan 22, 2024 1:59:26 GMT
Why does ET continue to release generals with conflicting stats.
4/5 perks are pure Air Force yet he has 5 AF stars but 6 navy stars.
|
|
|
Post by Boss Tweed on Jan 22, 2024 6:51:02 GMT
Would have gotten a 4/5 if he did not require elite force carriers to be good.
|
|
|
Post by Colonia on Jan 22, 2024 13:13:15 GMT
Why does ET continue to release generals with conflicting stats. 4/5 perks are pure Air Force yet he has 5 AF stars but 6 navy stars. Agreed. At the price he should probably be 6*/6* but at the minimum 6* in air and 5* in navy.
|
|
|
Post by journeykeen on Jan 22, 2024 21:03:00 GMT
Why does ET continue to release generals with conflicting stats. 4/5 perks are pure Air Force yet he has 5 AF stars but 6 navy stars. Agreed. At the price he should probably be 6*/6* but at the minimum 6* in air and 5* in navy. I’ve never been a fan of “hybrids.” If his perks are for AF, give me 6 AF stars and 5 or 6 mobility stars and I’m happy.
|
|
|
Post by resiphius on Jan 23, 2024 11:11:52 GMT
Agreed. At the price he should probably be 6*/6* but at the minimum 6* in air and 5* in navy. I’ve never been a fan of “hybrids.” If his perks are for AF, give me 6 AF stars and 5 or 6 mobility stars and I’m happy. He is not hybrid but a very dedicated carrier one. Eisenhower and Yamaguchi are true hybrids.
|
|
|
Post by possotop on Jan 29, 2024 11:36:55 GMT
One of the best generals for carriers. I use him alongside with McCampbell and Yamamoto.
|
|