|
|
Post by Conrad von Hotzendorf on Mar 24, 2016 14:22:31 GMT
Why not both
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Mar 24, 2016 14:23:49 GMT
And of course I'll also kill Murat and Bessières (Lannes had some bad relations with them). They lied to Napoléon about me you gonna kill Murat? (GRAB THE POPCORN PEOPLE! ITS THE NEW SHOW! MURAT VS LANNES !) Fresh Popcorn! Fresh Popcorn! $1.99 a kernel! (Having a Monopoly on a good with inelastic demand is great, if you get my Econ-talk) |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Mar 24, 2016 14:48:24 GMT
you gonna kill Murat? (GRAB THE POPCORN PEOPLE! ITS THE NEW SHOW! MURAT VS LANNES !) Fresh Popcorn! Fresh Popcorn! $1.99 a kernel! (Having a Monopoly on a good with inelastic demand is great, if you get my Econ-talk) ayy somebody said economics! Sorry, but I'm more of a perfect competitor (I take the price from the people  ) |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 24, 2016 19:04:29 GMT
That hardly would benefit the design of the game. You would end up with two mediocre games into one instead of a separate individual game that is well thought out and well designed. |
|
|
|
Post by Conrad von Hotzendorf on Mar 24, 2016 22:20:54 GMT
That hardly would benefit the design of the game. You would end up with two mediocre games into one instead of a separate individual game that is well thought out and well designed. I mean like ww2 tech in the Napoleonic wars or vise versa |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 25, 2016 2:14:43 GMT
That hardly would benefit the design of the game. You would end up with two mediocre games into one instead of a separate individual game that is well thought out and well designed. I mean like ww2 tech in the Napoleonic wars or vise versa Why? It's like putting together tanks and bayonets or calvary and nukes. Doesn't make sense. Besides I already explained that it's better to make a game more focused on something specific abd develop that game to a point where it's very well designed. |
|
|
|
Post by Singlemalt on Mar 25, 2016 6:18:06 GMT
Why not "non" |
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Apr 6, 2016 17:57:55 GMT
Why not "non" Why not nada, none, nothing. Rpg this and Rpg that, Real world events should not be in a rpg game, you cannot just rp a man that killed someone, it does not show any morality towards the people who died, although EW and WC series in it selves are not very, tolerant to the real world, im still playing it because its addictive, like a fun advanced game of chess. |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 6, 2016 19:18:07 GMT
Not a big fan of that lock. I'd cast my vote for Nap.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 6, 2016 22:16:07 GMT
I'd cast for Napoleon
|
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Apr 7, 2016 0:16:47 GMT
When you enter EU4 and you see Peru leading the Peru-Bolivian Confederation...
And also when you see Andrés de Santa Cruz is a good leader.
And when you don't see the Count of Caxais in the game...
|
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Apr 7, 2016 15:50:14 GMT
Well actually I should be the former president of Bolivia.
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 7, 2016 18:16:36 GMT
When you enter Vi2 and you see Peru leading the Peru-Bolivian Confederation... And also when you see Andrés de Santa Cruz is a good leader. And when you don't see the Count of Caxais in the game... You mean Vicky 2? In EU4, the new world in Peru/Bolivia is Incas. |
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Apr 7, 2016 20:48:09 GMT
I'd cast for Napoleon Considering this out of realization, South America would also be a place for some rpg action, I guess I would be in the cast too, As "El Liberador". Making some cool alliances and buttkicking the spanish back to Madrid. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 7, 2016 22:13:30 GMT
I'd cast for Napoleon Considering this out of realization, South America would also be a place for some rpg action, I guess I would be in the cast too, As "El Liberador". Making some cool alliances and buttkicking the spanish back to Madrid. Well, Bolivar wasn't the only freedom fighter |
|
.jpg)
)
