|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2016 4:54:52 GMT
In theory it shouldn't,but there is a always a chance it might create new issues on the very low end mobile devices.Hopefully not,we will see. In theory it shouldn't change that much, except for the memory usage which now shall be 10-20%more, which is not much and it should properly work even on old java and symbian devices(not older than 2002 I guess) |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 6, 2016 18:55:36 GMT
Just out of curiosity, is there a way to read the gibberish the dice gives out in the mobile view? I assume each different code correspond to a number. If this is not tested yet, there's no need to extensively test that and compare the results. I'm just curious if this has been already found out or not. If your on Mobile you can switch to the desktop view by scrolling all the way down to <Back ^Top Dashboard Desktop Click desktop. Even if your on a phone it should work. Hard to use though, and I havent tried on an Apple. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 6, 2016 19:28:01 GMT
Just out of curiosity, is there a way to read the gibberish the dice gives out in the mobile view? I assume each different code correspond to a number. If this is not tested yet, there's no need to extensively test that and compare the results. I'm just curious if this has been already found out or not. If your on Mobile you can switch to the desktop view by scrolling all the way down to <Back ^Top Dashboard Desktop Click desktop. Even if your on a phone it should work. Hard to use though, and I havent tried on an Apple. I'm guessing Firefox/Chrome for iOS should have that function, probably the native browser (safari) does too |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 9, 2016 0:42:36 GMT
Thanks for posting. Very helpful.
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 9, 2016 3:21:58 GMT
Just out of curiosity, is there a way to read the gibberish the dice gives out in the mobile view? I assume each different code correspond to a number. If this is not tested yet, there's no need to extensively test that and compare the results. I'm just curious if this has been already found out or not. If your on Mobile you can switch to the desktop view by scrolling all the way down to <Back ^Top Dashboard Desktop Click desktop. Even if your on a phone it should work. Hard to use though, and I havent tried on an Apple. It works... and for reference, I'm using Samsung Galaxy S5, android btw. So yeah it works just fine, switching between the views. Takes a while for the browser to switch, roughly 10 seconds. I'm so spoiled by my native Ohio city. It sucks being in the countryside. The way things work atm...just felt awkward that every time I want to read (not even to post a dice roll, but just to read) I have to go to the desktop version. I was asking about if the dice readout pictures also gave a better text readout concurrently so the mobile view could read the resulting numbers easily even though the mobile view wouldn't see the dice pictures themselves. Just an idea, kinda pointless but nice to have anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Apr 22, 2016 6:40:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Apr 22, 2016 7:16:14 GMT
You mean the one he uses in his star trek war. 10 dices are used. So the base number foerwinning a battle is 35+(((defenderBP-attackerBP)/attackerBP)*30), rounded up. At that number each side takes 50% lost for their army. Every dice roll above means attacker suffers 2% less lost and defender suffers 2% more lost and vice versa when dice roll is below. Finding the base number is a bit hard to grasp at first. In words its. Its defenderBP minus attackerBP, than divide that number by attackerBP, than times that number by it self 30 times, than add 35 to that number |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 22, 2016 15:21:44 GMT
I have a formula that calculates the minimum victory roll based on BP. It also uses that info and the actual dice roll to calculate casualties. It's currently based on 10 dice, but can be converted to work with 2 |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 22, 2016 15:23:03 GMT
You mean the one he uses in his star trek war. 10 dices are used. So the base number foerwinning a battle is 35+(((defenderBP-attackerBP)/attackerBP)*30), rounded up. At that number each side takes 50% lost for their army. Every dice roll above means attacker suffers 2% less lost and defender suffers 2% more lost and vice versa when dice roll is below. Finding the base number is a bit hard to grasp at first. In words its. Its defenderBP minus attackerBP, than divide that number by attackerBP, than times that number by it self 30 times, than add 35 to that number It's multiply the number by 30, not by itself 30 times. * means multiplication usually |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 22, 2016 16:26:32 GMT
You mean the one he uses in his star trek war. 10 dices are used. So the base number foerwinning a battle is 35+(((defenderBP-attackerBP)/attackerBP)*30), rounded up. At that number each side takes 50% lost for their army. Every dice roll above means attacker suffers 2% less lost and defender suffers 2% more lost and vice versa when dice roll is below. Finding the base number is a bit hard to grasp at first. In words its. Its defenderBP minus attackerBP, than divide that number by attackerBP, than times that number by it self 30 times, than add 35 to that number It's multiply the number by 30, not by itself 30 times. * means multiplication usually Also in add to this comment, the symbol ^ is the mathematical notation for the exponent, not *. Just for future reference. |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Apr 22, 2016 16:49:19 GMT
Btw just want to note you that you can write
35+(((defenderBP-attackerBP)/attackerBP)*30)
Into
35+(defenderBP-attackerBP)/attackerBP*30
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 22, 2016 16:50:36 GMT
Btw just want to note you that you can write 35+(((defenderBP-attackerBP)/attackerBP)*30) Into 35+(defenderBP-attackerBP)/attackerBP*30 I know, I just wanted to make sure no one misinterprets it |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 22, 2016 19:24:46 GMT
Btw just want to note you that you can write 35+(((defenderBP-attackerBP)/attackerBP)*30) Into 35+(defenderBP-attackerBP)/attackerBP*30 I know, I just wanted to make sure no one misinterprets it is right. If the math is done out of the standard order, it affects the results a lot. But the excess ()s does look messy. A picture would be neater and leaves no confusion at the same time. |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 22, 2016 21:14:33 GMT
Done by the phone from scratch. The line would be better drawn on a real computer.  What do you think? Every time somebody asks about the formula, instead of trying to express it via text...Just post an [*img] (without the * ofc) and this url: s31.postimg.cc/cxcnvvvrf/tmp_6221_2016_04_22_16_09_19_459666191.jpgDon't forget to close the tag with a [*/img].  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2016 9:54:33 GMT
Frederick the Great check this, maybe you will understand this, her are some formulas and explanation
|
|
