|
|
Post by CCCPball on Jun 1, 2015 19:10:00 GMT
It bothers me when other countries move their soldiers, tanks, and artillery through my borders. They make giant ugly borders, and I wish that Easytech could change this by having your allies moving through your borders not change it's shape. Is anyone else bothered by this? It has been a issue for me since Eurasian War IV: Napoleon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Philip II of Macedon on Jun 1, 2015 19:32:00 GMT
Yeah I hate it. There either should be no borders or borders based on cities, where each one has an area around it the color of the owner. The borders they have now are just weird
|
|
|
|
Post by saltin on Jun 2, 2015 1:34:28 GMT
Preach it brother! I not sure why they insist in doing that in world conqueror 3 other than it's probably the exact same game engine as European war 4.
GoG didnt have these crazy shifting borders and it doesn't look silly as a result.
|
|
|
|
Post by CCCPball on Jun 2, 2015 2:11:12 GMT
Glory of Generals (along with Glory of Generals Pacific) made it have BEAUTIFUL terrain, but it should have those colours in there. In think Hearts of Iron IV terrain and coloured borders together is what it should be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Philip II of Macedon on Jun 2, 2015 23:21:27 GMT
Great idea
|
|
|
|
Post by Elmer on Sept 27, 2015 6:19:33 GMT
It is annoying when allies move through borders and ESPECIALY WHEN THEY BUILD FORTS ON MY LAND but i like the mechanic, it makes you appreciate the progress you make. Maybe just make it to where allies cant take land?
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Sept 27, 2015 8:09:15 GMT
If the allies can't take your land you got a problem when playing some countries. especially with ew4 1815. some countries are just laying behind an allie. with this you can't move and do anything except build bunkers in your countrie and save up money
|
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Sept 27, 2015 11:56:47 GMT
Maybe they could make it so your allies just move through your land, but the borders stay the same. I.e, the ally doesn't *Auto corrected* up the borders by moving through it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Sept 27, 2015 17:53:37 GMT
In WC2, your allies couldn't move at all when you surround them with your land  |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 6, 2015 3:19:58 GMT
In WC2, your allies couldn't move at all when you surround them with your land It was good when you wanted to get more money but bad when you needed some allied support. |
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Oct 6, 2015 4:17:41 GMT
In WC2, your allies couldn't move at all when you surround them with your land It was good when you wanted to get more money but bad when you needed some allied support. You can exploit that by using enemy land as impenetrable line of defense. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 6, 2015 9:21:39 GMT
I was playing 1939 France yesterday and Britain tried to come onto my land. I built coastal forts along every spot on my northern coast. I will not deal with their stupid border disruption!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 6, 2015 9:23:32 GMT
And it's annoying how I will be Russia and start attacking North America, and then the PRC finds it necessary to move their generals and soldiers across all of Europe to come "help" me. R.I.P smooth borders
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Oct 6, 2015 9:34:40 GMT
And it's annoying how I will be Russia and start attacking North America, and then the PRC finds it necessary to move their generals and soldiers across all of Europe to come "help" me. R.I.P smooth borders rip smooth borders plus rip on the help of the PRC in Europe, you could be dead fighting alone in such a condition in Europe. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 7, 2015 20:23:46 GMT
I was playing 1939 France yesterday and Britain tried to come onto my land. I built coastal forts along every spot on my northern coast. I will not deal with their stupid border disruption! But Mountbatten wanted to help you!!! |
|
