|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2016 11:13:28 GMT
Hey again, i just finish another conquest with finland. Its all not too hard. The only problem is, it took me 110 turns to complete it. As i read on this forum, i need to finish it under 65 turn. Here is my question: should i buy new general to fasten things up, or just wait for guderian? If so, who should i buy? From my last conquest, my style of play consist of mobilize a lot of armored car and using plane & destroyer to crack cities. I hope someone could recommend me based on my style of play. Right now im considering to buy ozawa or auchinleck or greim. Are they worth? I also want to upgrade tech, should i just upgrade it or save the resources to build wonders? My current state: HQ level : 19 Medal : 600 Industry : 6793 Energy : 2601 Technology : 1760 Upgrade : artillery lv 4 Tank lv 3 Wonder : great mosque Hanging garden Mir castle complex Kremlin Brandenburg gate General : 3 virgin no name general Badoglio Thanks for any response..... Get Mayer then guderian and or yamamoto(you should get both) after then gen arty gen And as you have badoglio you can get Rommel / Patton before konev or any other arty gen
|
|
|
Post by beruang on Jan 25, 2016 11:27:48 GMT
Get Mayer then guderian and or yamamoto(you should get both) after then gen arty gen And as you have badoglio you can get Rommel / Patton before konev or any other arty gen So basically i need tank general rather than air/navy general? Is that so? Is meyer quite good? I once read the best output for cheap tank general would be auchinleck or crear?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2016 14:36:01 GMT
And as you have badoglio you can get Rommel / Patton before konev or any other arty gen So basically i need tank general rather than air/navy general? Is that so? Is meyer quite good? I once read the best output for cheap tank general would be auchinleck or crear? Crerar is the best cheap tank gen but asks good tactics If you like you can get Yamamoto before Guderian, but it won't make campaign easier
|
|
|
Post by OCarinha on Jan 25, 2016 20:06:11 GMT
I've done the mid-reward with Canada in both 1950/60. It's quite an easy task since the world is basically the same. Just send some troop to west europe and stop WTO from conquering Madrid & London (Berlin for 1960 too), and you should try to get the main cities when your allies die or something. A aircraft carrier with a navy general (I'm using Ozawa) on europe will do good aswell. Meanwhile, you've gotta send some troops and land them on japan (always let one troop outside Tokyo, since it'll get nuked like 2 times/round and when the time comes, just conquer it), and then stop the soviet/chinese attack on japan, then produce lots of super tanks in tokyo and get them on asia, after you've capped the main nuclear cities from china/SU, it's just a matter of time until you eat the whole world.
Made it in 1950 within 76 rounds.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2016 20:53:56 GMT
I've done the mid-reward with Canada in both 1950/60. It's quite an easy task since the world is basically the same. Just send some troop to west europe and stop WTO from conquering Madrid & London (Berlin for 1960 too), and you should try to get the main cities when your allies die or something. A aircraft carrier with a navy general (I'm using Ozawa) on europe will do good aswell. Meanwhile, you've gotta send some troops and land them on japan (always let one troop outside Tokyo, since it'll get nuked like 2 times/round and when the time comes, just conquer it), and then stop the soviet/chinese attack on japan, then produce lots of super tanks in tokyo and get them on asia, after you've capped the main nuclear cities from china/SU, it's just a matter of time until you eat the whole world. Made it in 1950 within 76 rounds. It's a bit slow but with mid levels it's ok
|
|
|
Post by TK421 on Jan 25, 2016 20:57:11 GMT
I thought Italy was an easier 2 star country. After crushing southern Russia and the Middle East, the rest of the world fell like a ton of bricks. Especially after America and Australia started their little push into China, thus weakening them enough for my troops to push in and kill them off.
|
|
|
Post by beruang on Jan 26, 2016 7:25:25 GMT
So basically i need tank general rather than air/navy general? Is that so? Is meyer quite good? I once read the best output for cheap tank general would be auchinleck or crear? Crerar is the best cheap tank gen but asks good tactics If you like you can get Yamamoto before Guderian, but it won't make campaign easier Thanks for the advice. Now i'm confident to get tank general to speed things up. I think meyer is too weak considering only sergeant. I guess i'll go for auchinleck or crear.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2016 9:06:31 GMT
Crerar is the best cheap tank gen but asks good tactics If you like you can get Yamamoto before Guderian, but it won't make campaign easier Thanks for the advice. Now i'm confident to get tank general to speed things up. I think meyer is too weak considering only sergeant. I guess i'll go for auchinleck or crear. When I started 1st time I used crerar as my first gen and got very far with him. If you decide to buy crerar after a while you will want to upgrade his health to get max output from him that's because he dies very fast in 50-60
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jan 26, 2016 21:48:48 GMT
Hey again, i just finish another conquest with finland. Its all not too hard. The only problem is, it took me 110 turns to complete it. As i read on this forum, i need to finish it under 65 turn. Here is my question: should i buy new general to fasten things up, or just wait for guderian? If so, who should i buy? From my last conquest, my style of play consist of mobilize a lot of armored car and using plane & destroyer to crack cities. I hope someone could recommend me based on my style of play. Right now im considering to buy ozawa or auchinleck or greim. Are they worth? I also want to upgrade tech, should i just upgrade it or save the resources to build wonders? I think you're going at this problem the wrong way. 1939 is the lowest conquest, which doesn't really require fancy generals and all that. You picked Finland, if you wanted an easier 1 star country: Hungary or Bulgaria. But if you want to do ANY conquest under 65 in the 1939, I managed to get an easy win with Japan with low techs, almost no wonders, and just no-eyes cmdrs in 63 turns 2 weeks ago.
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Jan 27, 2016 2:12:26 GMT
That is what I also used I must tell this to my friend who says China is better then Russia in 1939. (Use Russia for allies in 1939)
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Jan 27, 2016 3:47:26 GMT
That is what I also used I must tell this to my friend who says China is better then Russia in 1939. (Use Russia for allies in 1939) If someone says ______ country is better than SU in 1939, that person shouldn't be your friend. The only friends you should have are Govorov and Guderian which will get nuked in like turn 2
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jan 27, 2016 3:47:49 GMT
From my last conquest, my style of play consist of mobilize a lot of armored car and using plane & destroyer to crack cities. I hope someone could recommend me based on my style of play. Right now im considering to buy ozawa or auchinleck or greim. Are they worth? One more thing to nitpick at, your unit usage. I don't recommend destroyers for anything else than mainly taking down coastal fortresses and also for standing in the way between your own battleships and the enemy submarines. For cracking cities with naval units, it depends on if it has anti-air defenses or not. No anti-air? Aircraft carriers are best in packs of like 5, 6 or even 10. They are capable of pummeling cities hard without taking damages in return. Anti-air? That will cut down the carriers' effective damage quite a lot. Go with battleships at two hexes distance, they do a lot of damage to the cities' hp more than the land army unit standing inside the cities. Destoyers can't attack from a distance so they will always lose hp every time they attack (unless the city is emptied out), and their guns are ineffective against land units even worse than battleships anyway. Edit: I disagree about Soviet Union because 1939 is tilted in favor of the axis side, playing Japan is a lot more smoother than fighting uphill against both sides of Axis at the same time. Plus Russian generals tends to end up dead quicker than Japanese ones (specifically for 1939 btw, not 1943 or later).
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Jan 27, 2016 22:32:25 GMT
Japann is best but I was suggesting Russia if play allies 1939 for 65 turn game
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2016 23:04:16 GMT
Russia 1939 is the fastest game ever... and Japan is in 2nd place
|
|
|
Post by Basilikon Agemos on Jan 28, 2016 1:29:59 GMT
Russia 1939 is the fastest game ever... and Japan is in 2nd place Mexico 1943 is easy... Until the Japan part.
|
|