|
|
Post by wollesu on Apr 30, 2016 19:46:01 GMT
There basically very few naval majority missions (Allies 2 , Allies 10 , Axis 9, WTO 1). I could not be able to show the full potential of my naval commander. I wonder why Easytech Skipped out many Naval operations in WWW2
|
|
|
|
Post by cardbattler on May 1, 2016 0:45:21 GMT
WC3's system makes it not fun to have many naval missions. Like, how do you expect a battleship to shell a submarine without the latter having a chance to dodge ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sorbet on May 1, 2016 1:13:42 GMT
Exactly. With enough time you can dominate the sea just by constantly producing submarines, submarines and submarines. Within a whole picture of sea and continents the control of sea doesn't hold much value here: even after you dominated the sea it's not like you can exert great influence over the land from water (carriers are not that efficient). Nor does naval units do heavy damage to land units in water, so the concept of blockade doesn't effectively apply either. Once you dominated the sea and captured all enemy ports, you won't produce any more naval units. You will produce land units and use airport if you need airstrike. The land and the sea are almost like separate domains.
|
|
|
|
Post by Amatsukaze on May 1, 2016 1:26:59 GMT
WC3's system makes it not fun to have many naval missions. Like, how do you expect a battleship to shell a submarine without the latter having a chance to dodge ? A Destroyer is telling you that she has a solution for this one(’・ω・‘) |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 1, 2016 1:30:19 GMT
WC3's system makes it not fun to have many naval missions. Like, how do you expect a battleship to shell a submarine without the latter having a chance to dodge ? A Destroyer is telling you that she has a solution for this one(’・ω・‘) Donitz: No matter if it is a battleship, a carrier or a destroyer, my submarines will sink it. |
|
|
|
Post by Amatsukaze on May 1, 2016 1:32:08 GMT
A Destroyer is telling you that she has a solution for this one(’・ω・‘) Donitz: No matter if it is a battleship, a carrier or a destroyer, my submarines will sink it. Then what if you don't have a Donitz(’・ω・‘) |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 1, 2016 1:34:28 GMT
Donitz: No matter if it is a battleship, a carrier or a destroyer, my submarines will sink it. Then what if you don't have a Donitz(’・ω・‘) Goring: Ju-87 ready, bomb'em. |
|
|
|
Post by Amatsukaze on May 1, 2016 1:45:43 GMT
Then what if you don't have a Donitz(’・ω・‘) Goring: Ju-87 ready, bomb'em. Do something with no general, cu'mon, just a pack of submarines(’・ω・‘) I got my own formula for naval attacks OwO |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 1, 2016 1:54:57 GMT
Goring: Ju-87 ready, bomb'em. Do something with no general, cu'mon, just a pack of submarines(’・ω・‘) I got my own formula for naval attacks OwO Alright, spam submarine, bang bang bang, now the ocean belongs to me. |
|
|
|
Post by Sorbet on May 1, 2016 1:59:49 GMT
Goring: Ju-87 ready, bomb'em. Do something with no general, cu'mon, just a pack of submarines(’・ω・‘) I got my own formula for naval attacks OwO If it is a pure naval battle with no generals, the ideal formation would be submarines (greatest in number) forming the frontline to defend your battleships, while some of them sail past the frontline to sink enemy battleships and carriers, while a line of battleships behind attacking destroyers and submarines from distance and carriers from far behind bombing the same two groups of enemies. |
|
|
|
Post by wollesu on May 1, 2016 7:14:27 GMT
Easytech hates water
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on May 4, 2016 21:57:55 GMT
*Meets Enemy Ships*
*Mass spam submarines, support with Battleships/Arty and Bombers/Carriers.*
*Enemy Defeated*
--How I play any Naval-based Mission in WC3
U-boats Über Alles.
|
|
