|
|
Post by Ivan Konev on May 9, 2016 4:43:45 GMT
Which 5* or maybe less, is the best? Take into account the Guerrilla skill and price of general.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel on May 9, 2016 9:40:04 GMT
Which 5* or maybe less, is the best? Take into account the Guerrilla skill and price of general. Vasilevsky. Buuuuuuuut.... if you want an inf gen for challenges, just go with Guderian. He's good with it. |
|
|
|
Post by Marshal Hugh Dowding on May 9, 2016 9:51:36 GMT
Which 5* or maybe less, is the best? Take into account the Guerrilla skill and price of general. Vasilevsky. Buuuuuuuut.... if you want an inf gen for challenges, just go with Guderian. He's good with it how is guderian a inf gen, wtf |
|
|
|
Post by NotU on May 9, 2016 11:38:40 GMT
Vasilevsky. Buuuuuuuut.... if you want an inf gen for challenges, just go with Guderian. He's good with it how is guderian a inf gen, wtf 3 inf star (18 dmg) + plain fighting 4 (20 dmg) + average damage (20 dmg) = 58 damage in average. Also, lv 2 Defence tactic and 4 movement stars. So yes, he can be an infantry general, too. |
|
|
|
Post by Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel on May 9, 2016 11:58:35 GMT
3 inf star (18 dmg) + plain fighting 4 (20 dmg) + average damage (20 dmg) = 58 damage in average. Also, lv 2 Defence tactic and 4 movement stars. So yes, he can be an infantry general, too. No, the 3 stars is worth 16 (8-4-4-4-8)so, 56. |
|
|
|
Post by Amatsukaze on May 9, 2016 12:43:07 GMT
Vasilevsky. Buuuuuuuut.... if you want an inf gen for challenges, just go with Guderian. He's good with it how is guderian a inf gen, wtf That's what I always say you never need a pure-infantry general 0.0 |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on May 9, 2016 12:49:52 GMT
konev, since theres little need for a pure-infantery general
if you still want one, yamashita or valivesky could do it
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 9, 2016 12:59:11 GMT
Konev is absolutely enough. If you want a pure infantry, I recommend Vasilevsky.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marshal Hugh Dowding on May 9, 2016 14:11:56 GMT
3 inf star (18 dmg) + plain fighting 4 (20 dmg) + average damage (20 dmg) = 58 damage in average. Also, lv 2 Defence tactic and 4 movement stars. So yes, he can be an infantry general, too. but srs if u use guderian on inf u are really wasting a good general |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on May 10, 2016 5:34:54 GMT
Nasser can be good if you need a cheap one but the best infantry general'd be Vasilevsky for output or Mannerheim for surviving
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on May 10, 2016 5:35:27 GMT
3 inf star (18 dmg) + plain fighting 4 (20 dmg) + average damage (20 dmg) = 58 damage in average. Also, lv 2 Defence tactic and 4 movement stars. So yes, he can be an infantry general, too. but srs if u use guderian on inf u are really wasting a good general Guderian is like Lannes. He can be used on multiple units but is really just designed for one |
|
E.T.
First Lieutenant
WC3 Full Tutorial video creator
Active
Posts: 28 
|
Post by E.T. on May 11, 2016 9:57:24 GMT
3 inf star (18 dmg) + plain fighting 4 (20 dmg) + average damage (20 dmg) = 58 damage in average. Also, lv 2 Defence tactic and 4 movement stars. So yes, he can be an infantry general, too. but srs if u use guderian on inf u are really wasting a good general Yes , Vasilevsky is better |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on May 12, 2016 19:18:07 GMT
but srs if u use guderian on inf u are really wasting a good general Guderian is like Lannes. He can be used on multiple units but is really just designed for one Lannes has a bit more hybrid capacity than Guderian, but I see what you're getting at |
|
|
|
Post by Franz von Hipper on May 14, 2016 0:53:30 GMT
Guderian is like Lannes. He can be used on multiple units but is really just designed for one Lannes has a bit more hybrid capacity than Guderian, but I see what you're getting at You kind of want to be hybrid, yet if your skills are too dispersed, you end up like Desaix, not good at anything in particular. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on May 14, 2016 3:59:20 GMT
Lannes has a bit more hybrid capacity than Guderian, but I see what you're getting at You kind of want to be hybrid, yet if your skills are too dispersed, you end up like Desaix, not good at anything in particular. Or Bradley, to use a WC3 example |
|
