|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 13, 2016 23:54:06 GMT
Its wierd Golitsyn is cavalry and ushakov navy nothing simmalar
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2016 0:29:47 GMT
Its wierd Golitsyn is cavalry and ushakov navy nothing simmalar We all make mistakes. What if an event like imperialism didn't occur? |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 14, 2016 0:33:51 GMT
Its wierd Golitsyn is cavalry and ushakov navy nothing simmalar We all make mistakes. What if an event like imperialism didn't occur? People would live in tribes or unite like maybe there would be crazy borders like german tribes would maybe unite over time or fight just to show them their power we could see a west east south slav union and an alliance with them but idk its really hard question but a good question props to you eissenhower |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2016 0:39:54 GMT
We all make mistakes. What if an event like imperialism didn't occur? People would live in tribes or unite like maybe there would be crazy borders like german tribes would maybe unite over time or fight just to show them their power we could see a west east south slav union and an alliance with them but idk its really hard question but a good question props to you eissenhower I'm not sure you understood quite right, imperialism was the colonization of Africa and Asia. |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 14, 2016 0:45:54 GMT
People would live in tribes or unite like maybe there would be crazy borders like german tribes would maybe unite over time or fight just to show them their power we could see a west east south slav union and an alliance with them but idk its really hard question but a good question props to you eissenhower I'm not sure you understood quite right, imperialism was the colonization of Africa and Asia. Imperialism is making an empire duuh expanding a country or bation by militence |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 14, 2016 0:49:57 GMT
I dont usethe duuh word in a bad way but in a silly way
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2016 0:50:41 GMT
I'm not sure you understood quite right, imperialism was the colonization of Africa and Asia. Imperialism is making an empire duuh expanding a country or bation by militence Pretty close, but the imperialism era was when England and France colonized most of Africa and Asia. This left Germany and Italy as well as Spain, mad at the kings of imperialism. Ultimately imperialism became a major cause of WWI. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2016 0:52:15 GMT
It is true that the term imperialism does mean expanding one's military, but I'm talking about the Age of Imperialism
|
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 14, 2016 0:52:40 GMT
Imperialism is making an empire duuh expanding a country or bation by militence Pretty close, but the imperialism era was when England and France colonized most of Africa and Asia. This left Germany and Italy as well as Spain, mad at the kings of imperialism. Ultimately imperialism became a major cause of WWI. But you said if there wasnt imperialism not the era I know about the scramble for Africa but you said if there want imperialism and turned away in an another direction |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2016 0:58:08 GMT
Pretty close, but the imperialism era was when England and France colonized most of Africa and Asia. This left Germany and Italy as well as Spain, mad at the kings of imperialism. Ultimately imperialism became a major cause of WWI. But you said if there wasnt imperialism not the era I know about the scramble for Africa but you said if there want imperialism and turned away in an another direction Maybe we should just pick a different topic. French Revolution - What if it didn't happen? |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 14, 2016 1:01:25 GMT
But you said if there wasnt imperialism not the era I know about the scramble for Africa but you said if there want imperialism and turned away in an another direction Maybe we should just pick a different topic. French Revolution - What if it didn't happen? No Napoleon No Maybe No Concert Of Europe better relations beetween european powers the Europeans would not concetrate on fighting France and maybe push the Ottomans out of Europe so WW1 and WW2 would not be the same |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Aug 14, 2016 8:59:39 GMT
The only way I believe it was famous in napoleonic wars was with Ushakov, undefeated in the field Uhmmmm what? I really dont understand what you just said Admiral ushakov was an general who never lost a battle |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 14, 2016 9:05:12 GMT
Uhmmmm what? I really dont understand what you just said Admiral ushakov was an general who never lost a battle ADMIRAL (as you said to begin with) NOT GENERAL. Despite what Easy Tech would have you think Admirals are NOT generals. At all. |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Aug 14, 2016 9:09:36 GMT
Admiral ushakov was an general who never lost a battle ADMIRAL (as you said to begin with) NOT GENERAL. Despite what Easy Tech would have you think Admirals are NOT generals. At all. I sort of changed by instinct |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Aug 14, 2016 9:10:33 GMT
Uhmmmm what? I really dont understand what you just said Admiral ushakov was an general who never lost a battle I actually didnt know that  |
|
