|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2016 22:14:12 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 26, 2016 22:18:48 GMT
I will examine the formula tonite. Espionage will have 1 of 2 solutions
1) Counter blocks 2 attacks instead of 1
2) A country can never be the victim of more than 2 successful attack
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Aug 26, 2016 23:42:12 GMT
I find the formula for attacking just fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Aug 27, 2016 0:54:18 GMT
I find the formula for attacking just fine. Agreed, it's a great improvement from the days of a regular dice roll and previous formulas |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 27, 2016 7:17:57 GMT
There is nothing wrong with the espionage system in my opinion. As Desophaeus said it gives smaller nations more of a fighting chance. The arguments against espionage are: "Why do I waste my counter turn because I was attacked multiple times" well by this logic counter itself is unfair because it makes any espionage attacks useless. And the other argument is: "I'm been ganged up on by smaller countries even though I'm many times their size and they have no change against me. Why can't I be allowed to just ROLF stomp them stop helping them having a fighting chance" this is simply unfair. You can not complain about been hit by numerous espionage attacks. The smaller countries need a hand and espionage provides this assistance. There is nothing wrong with it. You don't want to be hit by multiple enemies in espionage get friends or be a smaller country. If you don't want to be ganged up one PICK A SMALLER COUNTRY, BIG ONES WILL ALWAYS BE GANGED UP ON BECAUSE SMALLER COUNTRIES CANT WIN BY THEMSELVES Capitalised for emphasis not anger. |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 27, 2016 7:23:06 GMT
And if Jean-Luc Picard is going to buff counter espionage to help the already big and powerful countries buff the smaller ones. Give them laser guns. See how the big ones like it if they the small fish been given advantages. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 27, 2016 16:28:52 GMT
At this point I'm not sure if there is any mutually acceptable compromise to be had. The attack cap for espionage is the only thing that seems fair RN
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2016 16:49:59 GMT
At this point I'm not sure if there is any mutually acceptable compromise to be had. The attack cap for espionage is the only thing that seems fair RN Neither not realistic nor fair |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Aug 27, 2016 17:02:10 GMT
Guys, for god's sake. If I do one thing, Khurram and Sherman will quit. If I do the other, all my small countries will quit. I find no choice but to throw in the towel
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Aug 27, 2016 18:58:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Aug 27, 2016 22:39:50 GMT
Guys, for god's sake. If I do one thing, Khurram and Sherman will quit. If I do the other, all my small countries will quit. I find no choice but to throw in the towel Khurram and Sherman may be the largest and 3rd largest countries, but we smaller ones are the majority here. Don't throw in the towel. If you do, that's fine, it was supposed to be Salazar's war, right? But as the large countries, they are simply trying to ensure their victory. If Khurram and Sherman leave, they are only 2 of eight players. Leaving us with 6, that would certainly open up space for rookie players or experienced veterans. |
|
|
|
Post by Laurent de Gouvion on Aug 28, 2016 1:16:15 GMT
This might be too late, but my solution to the espionage problem:
Divide the acts by half, and round down to the nearest zero. So the attacks would be like this:
1 attack -> 0,5 attack -> 0 attack
2 attacks -> 1 attack
3 attacks -> 1,5 attack -> 1 attack
4 attacks -> 2 attack
And so on.....
There should also be priority systems of countering espionage (e.g. Assassination Attempt first, then Sabotage, then etc.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Aug 28, 2016 2:01:59 GMT
This might be too late, but my solution to the espionage problem: Divide the acts by half, and round down to the nearest zero. So the attacks would be like this: 1 attack -> 0,5 attack -> 0 attack 2 attacks -> 1 attack 3 attacks -> 1,5 attack -> 1 attack 4 attacks -> 2 attack And so on..... There should also be priority systems of countering espionage (e.g. Assassination Attempt first, then Sabotage, then etc.) I don't quite understand? |
|
|
|
Post by Laurent de Gouvion on Aug 28, 2016 3:13:16 GMT
This might be too late, but my solution to the espionage problem: Divide the acts by half, and round down to the nearest zero. So the attacks would be like this: 1 attack -> 0,5 attack -> 0 attack 2 attacks -> 1 attack 3 attacks -> 1,5 attack -> 1 attack 4 attacks -> 2 attack And so on..... There should also be priority systems of countering espionage (e.g. Assassination Attempt first, then Sabotage, then etc.) I don't quite understand Espionage:2. Then round down the result. |
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Aug 28, 2016 5:53:59 GMT
Tell me when to unlock
|
|
