|
|
Post by Tito on Sept 12, 2016 16:09:11 GMT
So should, is he really that good, the only good thing is the 5 stars in artillery and a lot of stars in the other classes, and I guess you can maybe say siege master is good.
I dont plan on getting himbut is he rally that good as in real life.
But I think he is more of an hybrid.
|
|
|
|
Post by Franz von Hipper on Sept 12, 2016 17:17:06 GMT
So should, is he really that good, the only good thing is the 5 stars in artillery and a lot of stars in the other classes, and I guess you can maybe say siege master is good. I dont plan on getting himbut is he rally that good as in real life. But I think he is more of an hybrid. He is certainly not worth the emblems. Plus he is not that good since his skills are unfocused. |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Sept 12, 2016 18:43:01 GMT
So should, is he really that good, the only good thing is the 5 stars in artillery and a lot of stars in the other classes, and I guess you can maybe say siege master is good. I dont plan on getting himbut is he rally that good as in real life. But I think he is more of an hybrid. He is certainly not worth the emblems. Plus he is not that good since his skills are unfocused. If he had explosive instead of engineering, then he could have been a great city smasher plus supporter with flags |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Sept 12, 2016 19:56:10 GMT
Siege Master?It says that is better against troops, deals more to troops?Am I right with that?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 12, 2016 20:36:57 GMT
Siege Master?It says that is better against troops, deals more to troops?Am I right with that? Siege master deals more to troops in cities. |
|
