|
|
Post by Washington on Sept 24, 2016 18:27:40 GMT
This may be another European war 4 boards rename affair
But shouldn't we rename the title 'marshall' to 'marshal'?
Unless this was intentional, which I have no knowledge of
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 24, 2016 19:01:46 GMT
Both spellings are considered correct, although Marshal is more common. saltin, Washington, I would advise for a change in the name of the rank, although it does not matter much. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Sept 24, 2016 19:26:11 GMT
This is going to sound wierd bug Marshall looks better than Marshal. Because words to me are like visuals and they carry weight. Two L's look better than one because it weighs down the word. Maybe I just sound crazy
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2016 21:38:07 GMT
Marshall is the proper spelling of military rank, the l version was made by people who made things like OK(a.c.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 24, 2016 22:32:10 GMT
Marshall is the proper spelling of military rank, the l version was made by people who made things like OK(a.c.) Marshal might also be from the French Maréchal |
|
|
|
Post by Stonewall Jackson on Sept 25, 2016 0:46:22 GMT
This is going to sound wierd bug Marshall looks better than Marshal. Because words to me are like visuals and they carry weight. Two L's look better than one because it weighs down the word. Maybe I just sound crazy I feel the same way. |
|
|
|
Post by saltin on Sept 25, 2016 1:18:03 GMT
Yeah at the time the ranking was made I had to check the spelling of that rank and it turned out both version were acceptable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2016 4:27:51 GMT
Marshall is the proper spelling of military rank, the l version was made by people who made things like OK(a.c.) Marshal might also be from the French MaréchalIt comes from that, but it was first introduced as Marshall in American infantry, I bet Sherman can tell more precisely, but the Marshal came as a misspell, just like thru, OK, Etc... |
|
