|
|
Post by Pierre-Charles Villeneuve on Sept 30, 2016 20:39:04 GMT
Do any of you think that if some of the bad emblem generals,were mid-priced second tiers,would they be acceptable?If so,explain in light detail.
For example;Suchet,Jackson,Barclay,Soult,etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Sept 30, 2016 20:58:17 GMT
Do any of you think that if some of the bad emblem generals,were mid-priced second tiers,would they be acceptable? For example;Suchet,Jackson,Barclay,Soult,etc. Soult would be. |
|
|
|
Post by Pierre-Charles Villeneuve on Sept 30, 2016 21:11:21 GMT
Do any of you think that if some of the bad emblem generals,were mid-priced second tiers,would they be acceptable? For example;Suchet,Jackson,Barclay,Soult,etc. Soult would be. How so? |
|
|
|
Post by Stonewall Jackson on Sept 30, 2016 21:20:04 GMT
Jackson is crap. I wouldn't buy him even if he was tier 1. He should have been so much better  |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 30, 2016 21:21:41 GMT
Do any of you think that if some of the bad emblem generals,were mid-priced second tiers,would they be acceptable?If so,explain in light detail. For example;Suchet,Jackson,Barclay,Soult,etc. Now Jackson is crap for tier-1, and Barclay basically has nothing but 3 inf stars and bugle. Suchet is still an inferior version of Savary. Soult's inf skills are only slightly below Dobeln and Oudinot. Coupled with his arti potential, he is competitivefor Tier 2, but dies in tier 3 |
|
|
|
Post by Pierre-Charles Villeneuve on Sept 30, 2016 21:25:39 GMT
I'd have to agree on that. Jackson is like a god that all of the crap generals worship,Platov and Rosenberg are most likely his head cultists. Ps:Apparently,I'm inside the quote. |
|
|
|
Post by Pierre-Charles Villeneuve on Sept 30, 2016 21:34:38 GMT
Do any of you think that if some of the bad emblem generals,were mid-priced second tiers,would they be acceptable?If so,explain in light detail. For example;Suchet,Jackson,Barclay,Soult,etc. Now Jackson is crap for tier-1, and Barclay basically has nothing but 3 inf stars and bugle. Suchet is still an inferior version of Savary. Soult's inf skills are only slightly below Dobeln and Oudinot. Coupled with his arti potential, he is competitivefor Tier 2, but dies in tier 3 I think if Suchet traded surprise for something infantry(maybe even trade fireproof),he might have been acceptable. Now,are there any other disgusting emblem generals someone would like to mention? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 30, 2016 21:40:41 GMT
Now Jackson is crap for tier-1, and Barclay basically has nothing but 3 inf stars and bugle. Suchet is still an inferior version of Savary. Soult's inf skills are only slightly below Dobeln and Oudinot. Coupled with his arti potential, he is competitivefor Tier 2, but dies in tier 3 I think if Suchet traded surprise for something infantry(maybe even trade fireproof),he might have been acceptable. Now,are there any other disgusting emblem generals someone would like to mention? The problem with Suchet is that he has mobility and infantry tactics, neither of which has any effect. |
|
|
|
Post by Pierre-Charles Villeneuve on Sept 30, 2016 21:43:02 GMT
If I am not mistaken,infantry tactics raises minimal damage by one point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 30, 2016 21:46:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Pierre-Charles Villeneuve on Sept 30, 2016 21:52:22 GMT
So,this perhaps,would be acceptable? Suchet: Formation Mass Fire Assault Art Spy Same stars. |
|
|
|
Post by Stonewall Jackson on Sept 30, 2016 21:57:19 GMT
So,this perhaps,would be acceptable? Suchet: Formation Mass Fire Fireproof(Possibly trade for Bugle or Assault Art) Spy Same stars. Fireproof needs to go. Spy is not necessary. |
|
|
|
Post by Pierre-Charles Villeneuve on Sept 30, 2016 21:59:15 GMT
*cough*
Grenadiers
Guards
*cough*
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 30, 2016 22:26:07 GMT
So,this perhaps,would be acceptable? Suchet: Formation Mass Fire Assault Art Same stars. This would be pretty crazy strong. More of an Infantry Murat than any relative of Suchet |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Sept 30, 2016 23:00:37 GMT
Do any of you think that if some of the bad emblem generals,were mid-priced second tiers,would they be acceptable?If so,explain in light detail. For example;Suchet,Jackson,Barclay,Soult,etc. Now Jackson is crap for tier-1, and Barclay basically has nothing but 3 inf stars and bugle. Suchet is still an inferior version of Savary. Soult's inf skills are only slightly below Dobeln and Oudinot. Coupled with his arti potential, he is competitivefor Tier 2, but dies in tier 3 If Jackson IS in tier-1 for a reasonable price(not more than Dumouriez), I'll buy him instead of Arnold. |
|
