|
|
Post by Der Kaiserreich on Nov 11, 2016 7:03:42 GMT
Say, is Discovery Age avaliable in the game? Nope, but please keep on topic.. this is about which geberals to invest in Wait... so how do you get Washinton and Lincoln? Just curious. |
|
|
|
Post by Der Kaiserreich on Nov 11, 2016 7:06:42 GMT
Hmmm, (sorry) between rich and p*or br*in/desperate Everyone has time , and time can buy you stuff in this game.. True, but that's when patience comes in. |
|
|
|
Post by Singlemalt on Nov 11, 2016 7:07:15 GMT
Nope, but please keep on topic.. this is about which geberals to invest in Wait... so how do you get Washinton and Lincoln? Just curious. You cqn seduce generals after building specifc towns.. in this thread you see which general in which city and the costs european-war-4.boards.net/post/98861/thread |
|
|
|
Post by Feldmarschall, Fish the Cake on Nov 11, 2016 7:14:10 GMT
If you're willing to grind , i recommend the mighty Hun! With some effort he's well worth and capable of doing everything alone! After him i recommend Nobunaga, who's by far the best ranged general that's capable of decimating key targets with the help of his allies !
Note: his 4 star upgrade is the Ashigaru that attacks twice , x2 the -50% defense and attack is something you must have!
Here's the mighty Hun build that I'm running ..  Takes decades to make such a fantastic Attila like that, but his skill set is just really created for a killing machine. Not decades , but some time , and when you finally finish it it's beyond satisfying! On the whole 'killing machine' part , you're completely right , he deals 700+* base damage to infantry(soldiers) and 440-600+* to everything else, and seeing that you quickly kill stuff off, your skill meter fills up almost immediately , which then allows him to do 1024+* to infantry(soldiers) and 700-800+* to everything else, which mean you'll be killing 4-5 guys , maybe more , which again fills up the skill meter and you just repeat the process, lol.. End game wise , for now, i only see Atilla as a end game general , alongside Nobunaga due to the fact that he procs his skills twice after upgrading to 4 stars, next to them , possibly Cesar, as a tanky healer , Alexander(maybe) and that's pretty much it in my opinion(for now/no iaps included) |
|
|
|
Post by Der Kaiserreich on Nov 11, 2016 7:15:56 GMT
Wait... so how do you get Washinton and Lincoln? Just curious. You cqn seduce generals after building specifc towns.. in this thread you see which general in which city and the costs european-war-4.boards.net/post/98861/threadThanks. I knew about seducing (is that what we're calling it now?) in cities. Just find it weird that you can get Lincoln before Discovery Age. Anyway, back to topic... |
|
|
|
Post by Singlemalt on Nov 11, 2016 8:16:25 GMT
Merged it with other general discussion thread. As long there is 1 forum part for EW5 we should try to combine this info we share with each other. Feldmarschall, Fish the Cake, I dont agree with your thoughts. Saladin has the better skill (logistics) and costs way less medals to get him as strong as he made Atilla. Alexander, Saladin, Li shimin, Nobunaga, Licoln and Napolion (IAP) are for me atm the generals in my equipment that I think I will use in end game (its guessing ofc since no update yet). I dont have Caesar but he probably has the stats to also be engame material |
|
|
|
Post by Feldmarschall, Fish the Cake on Nov 11, 2016 12:54:43 GMT
Merged it with other general discussion thread. As long there is 1 forum part for EW5 we should try to combine this info we share with each other. Feldmarschall, Fish the Cake , I dont agree with your thoughts. Saladin has the better skill (logistics) and costs way less medals to get him as strong as he made Atilla. Alexander, Saladin, Li shimin, Nobunaga, Licoln and Napolion (IAP) are for me atm the generals in my equipment that I think I will use in end game (its guessing ofc since no update yet). I dont have Caesar but he probably has the stats to also be engame material I tried out Sladin vs Atilla, and Atilla won, both stat wise and gameplay wise, and the reason for that is that he's far more tougher and resilient compared to his less expensive version and even tho Saladin has the skill, he still takes damage during a crossfire and doesn't deal enough to actually make it worthwhile and as soon as faced with tougher nuts he falls short.. |
|
|
|
Post by Feldmarschall, Fish the Cake on Nov 11, 2016 12:57:36 GMT
Also, i got Cesar, he's beyond tanky if outfitted properly and the constant heal makes him a key player for squishy general builds..
I would have posted his pic as well but i deleted EW5 and saved my data folder, I'm hoping i can transfer the saves at some point...
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 11, 2016 14:19:17 GMT
Merged it with other general discussion thread. As long there is 1 forum part for EW5 we should try to combine this info we share with each other. Feldmarschall, Fish the Cake , I dont agree with your thoughts. Saladin has the better skill (logistics) and costs way less medals to get him as strong as he made Atilla. Alexander, Saladin, Li shimin, Nobunaga, Licoln and Napolion (IAP) are for me atm the generals in my equipment that I think I will use in end game (its guessing ofc since no update yet). I dont have Caesar but he probably has the stats to also be engame material Logistics cavs make the last strike, while braveness cavs make the first, different topic. I'd say at the end I'll also buy Attila if easytech doesn't provide another decent braveness cav. Fun fact, Lincoln's 5* unit will be that anti-cav infantry from India. And Washington will be a crazy Gatling deals 50% extra to cav&inf. |
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Nov 11, 2016 14:44:25 GMT
Merged it with other general discussion thread. As long there is 1 forum part for EW5 we should try to combine this info we share with each other. Feldmarschall, Fish the Cake , I dont agree with your thoughts. Saladin has the better skill (logistics) and costs way less medals to get him as strong as he made Atilla. Alexander, Saladin, Li shimin, Nobunaga, Licoln and Napolion (IAP) are for me atm the generals in my equipment that I think I will use in end game (its guessing ofc since no update yet). I dont have Caesar but he probably has the stats to also be engame material Logistics cavs make the last strike, while braveness cavs make the first, different topic. I'd say at the end I'll also buy Attila if easytech doesn't provide another decent braveness cav. Fun fact, Lincoln's 5* unit will be that anti-cav infantry from India. And Washington will be a crazy Gatling deals 50% extra to cav&inf. Then is it better for cav to do the fetal strike since it can continue attacking other units? Based on what I read, I guess I would prefer logistics skill because of sustainability. Still I haven't played those general yet so all I can do now is to guess. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 11, 2016 15:04:26 GMT
Logistics cavs make the last strike, while braveness cavs make the first, different topic. I'd say at the end I'll also buy Attila if easytech doesn't provide another decent braveness cav. Fun fact, Lincoln's 5* unit will be that anti-cav infantry from India. And Washington will be a crazy Gatling deals 50% extra to cav&inf. Then is it better for cav to do the fetal strike since it can continue attacking other units? Based on what I read, I guess I would prefer logistics skill because of sustainability. Still I haven't played those general yet so all I can do now is to guess. Sorta like Ace Forces(which triggers every time after attack) vs Blitzkrieg. If you are facing some tough or anti-cav units(5*Lincoln, any archer gen), Saladin could only deal the last strike, while Attila can do the first. But yeah against normal units Saladin is way better. |
|
|
|
Post by Feldmarschall, Fish the Cake on Nov 11, 2016 15:44:35 GMT
In my opinion, the logistics skill is overrated, whilst it is on certain generals, those generals are balanced out in a way that kinda makes them weak without it.
Tho Saladin does have it, his active skill is horrible and the stats are mediocre, and although he's a cav; gen he's usually taking more damage than what he's actually healing, sometimes it takes a few hits to trigger that passive due to the mediocre damage output.
Whilst he is OP(early game/like every other 'high end' gen)he'll just become a pain to look at just because of that health bar of his, constantly being low and only occasionally filling up. Nevertheless I still field him because the other cav gens fall even more behind him and are usually situational..
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Nov 11, 2016 21:33:41 GMT
Logostics is a very useful skill in my experience. In conquest when I use Saladin he will stay alive and keep helping me. Compared to Genghis who has better stat and braveness but will get wear down by the battles and die. Saladin will always be regaining the health he lost and will keep fighting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 11, 2016 22:25:53 GMT
Logostics is a very useful skill in my experience. In conquest when I use Saladin he will stay alive and keep helping me. Compared to Genghis who has better stat and braveness but will get wear down by the battles and die. Saladin will always be regaining the health he lost and will keep fighting. What I'm afraid of in later eras is that enemy unit has crazy high output that Saladin cannot touch anyone. |
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Nov 11, 2016 22:36:20 GMT
Logostics is a very useful skill in my experience. In conquest when I use Saladin he will stay alive and keep helping me. Compared to Genghis who has better stat and braveness but will get wear down by the battles and die. Saladin will always be regaining the health he lost and will keep fighting. What I'm afraid of in later eras is that enemy unit has crazy high output that Saladin cannot touch anyone. Saladin will increase his stats too so I suspect he will still be good use in later era as long as he keeps getting upgraded. |
|
