|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 8, 2015 20:40:34 GMT
To be honest I think easytech will make something in the future, I hate that as much as anyone else here but it seems like that is very possible. One reason might be that you aren't really limited if you make games playing in the future.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 8, 2015 22:35:39 GMT
I don't like the future games because I have played many of those. Too many. And I really don't want to play another one. I sincerely hope that it will be ancient times. Swords and Spears>Guns and Bombs
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 8, 2015 23:21:00 GMT
I don't like the future games because I have played many of those. Too many. And I really don't want to play another one. I sincerely hope that it will be ancient times. Swords and Spears>Guns and Bombs Just played Battlefront Beta and I already hate sci-fi stuff. Really hope easytech's gonna do something in between 1600-1800 |
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Oct 9, 2015 4:54:12 GMT
I don't like the future games because I have played many of those. Too many. And I really don't want to play another one. I sincerely hope that it will be ancient times. Swords and Spears>Guns and Bombs Agree. Though, future has rooms for developer to make anything but the lack of associated history events makes future setting less... charming (well, can't think of a better word.). We are not gonna discuss as much about fictional characters in future setting as we are doing Napoleon, Lannes, Suvorov, Nelson, Mountbatten, Rommel, Guderian, Manstein, etc... |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 9, 2015 20:30:27 GMT
I don't like the future games because I have played many of those. Too many. And I really don't want to play another one. I sincerely hope that it will be ancient times. Swords and Spears>Guns and Bombs Agree. Though, future has rooms for developer to make anything but the lack of associated history events makes future setting less... charming (well, can't think of a better word.). We are not gonna discuss as much about fictional characters in future setting as we are doing Napoleon, Suvorov, Nelson, Mountbatten, Rommel, Guderian, Manstein, etc... Kanue you forgot Lannes how dare you?!? I'm just concerned that old times won't have as many troop possibilities. |
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Oct 10, 2015 4:16:48 GMT
Agree. Though, future has rooms for developer to make anything but the lack of associated history events makes future setting less... charming (well, can't think of a better word.). We are not gonna discuss as much about fictional characters in future setting as we are doing Napoleon, Suvorov, Nelson, Mountbatten, Rommel, Guderian, Manstein, etc... Kanue you forgot Lannes how dare you?!? I'm just concerned that old times won't have as many troop possibilities. Aaargh, sorry my bad. Anyway, yeah, the limited troop variety is also true. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 10, 2015 13:33:18 GMT
They could make up troops for all I care. JUST GIVE ME A ROMAN GAME!
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Oct 10, 2015 15:31:45 GMT
I hope it will be ww1 but anything will be okay execpt future
|
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Oct 10, 2015 16:27:58 GMT
I hope it will be ww1 but anything will be okay execpt future Russian civil war! Reds against Whites, February and October Revolution and the reconquering of the states that belonged to the empire of the Romanovs and perhaps the Russo-Polish war |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 10, 2015 18:06:17 GMT
Maybe a game that starts in 1917 with Germany still present about the Russian Civil War. The chance of this happening is like 1% though. I highly doubt that easytech would just concentrate on a war about one country only
|
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 7, 2016 16:06:30 GMT
Ok this is definitely worthy of reviving this thread. A Roman Empire would be great if its set during the barbarian invasion, so that Rome wont be OP. Really great.
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 7, 2016 18:52:11 GMT
Literally ANYTHING GOOD between Napoleon and ww1
To put it simply, 1816-1913, which makes 97 years
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 2:47:40 GMT
Literally ANYTHING GOOD between Napoleon and ww1 To put it simply, 1816-1913, which makes 97 years Wouldn't it technically be 1821-1911 because of the Italo-Ottoman War and the Balkan Wars? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 2:49:03 GMT
Ok this is definitely worthy of reviving this thread. A Roman Empire would be great if its set during the barbarian invasion, so that Rome wont be OP. Really great. That'd be pretty good but the alliances would be kinda messed up. You could make 1) the two Romes 2) All barbarians can attack each other but don't have to 3) the Sassanids & Huns |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 2:49:23 GMT
Idk if East and West Rome should be allied though
|
|
