|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 8, 2016 2:50:39 GMT
Ok this is definitely worthy of reviving this thread. A Roman Empire would be great if its set during the barbarian invasion, so that Rome wont be OP. Really great. That'd be pretty good but the alliances would be kinda messed up. You could make 1) the two Romes 2) All barbarians can attack each other but don't have to 3) the Sassanids & Huns Thats actually not a half bad idea |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 2:51:32 GMT
That'd be pretty good but the alliances would be kinda messed up. You could make 1) the two Romes 2) All barbarians can attack each other but don't have to 3) the Sassanids & Huns Thats actually not a half bad idea But all those barbarians would be a bit hard to do tbh |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 2:51:48 GMT
You could also do something on Charlemagne with the Muslims as 3rd party
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 2:52:27 GMT
Or something with the Americas and Native Americans fighting against the Europeans. Or of course also the Seven Years' War
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 2:53:53 GMT
Maybe something focused on the Ottomans/the Middle East. Easytech never really did something on Persia for example. Maybe add a Nader Shah campaign as part of the Polish Succession War.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 2:55:18 GMT
Something like that could be very interesting because on one side France and its allies would fight Russia while the Ottomans and Persia would fight their own war and maybe include parts of India even so you can create the Afsharid Empire. Tbh that'd be the best easytech game ever but I doubt it will happen. It's a good scenario though
|
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 8, 2016 2:57:12 GMT
Thats actually not a half bad idea But all those barbarians would be a bit hard to do tbh Well, Easytech got away with the Indians in EW4. Just make them into a few big united factions. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 2:58:06 GMT
But all those barbarians would be a bit hard to do tbh Well, Easytech got away with the Indians in EW4. Just make them into a few big united factions. You could say that Tecumseh did what he wanted in their game. So the federation kinda makes sense in 1812 but absolutely none in 1775. |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 8, 2016 3:05:01 GMT
Well, Easytech got away with the Indians in EW4. Just make them into a few big united factions. You could say that Tecumseh did what he wanted in their game. So the federation kinda makes sense in 1812 but absolutely none in 1775. . Their could be a Galic faction and Germania Confederacy, but then it would have to be Rome Uprising not Barbarian Invasion. |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 8, 2016 3:05:24 GMT
HOLY COW I LOVE THAT NAME ROME UPRISING <3<3<3<3<3
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 3:05:58 GMT
You could say that Tecumseh did what he wanted in their game. So the federation kinda makes sense in 1812 but absolutely none in 1775. . Their could be a Galic faction and Germania Confederacy, but then it would have to be Rome Uprising not Barbarian Invasion. But such a nation was never really formed so the only thing that comes close is Age of Charlemagne which would be in the 8th Century |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 3:06:42 GMT
HOLY COW I LOVE THAT NAME ROME UPRISING <3<3<3<3<3 but Rome wouldn't really be rising up. You could also focus on Belisarius' campaigns and how Justinian tried to bring Rome to former glory |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 8, 2016 3:07:54 GMT
. Their could be a Galic faction and Germania Confederacy, but then it would have to be Rome Uprising not Barbarian Invasion. But such a nation was never really formed so the only thing that comes close is Age of Charlemagne which would be in the 8th Century As is Gaul or Germania? Because I know 100% that there was a Confederacy of Germania, just wasn't called Confederacy. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 3:11:55 GMT
But such a nation was never really formed so the only thing that comes close is Age of Charlemagne which would be in the 8th Century As is Gaul or Germania? Because I know 100% that there was a Confederacy of Germania, just wasn't called Confederacy. Are you sure? Anyway, the whole thing also wouldn't really fit into easytech game series. The only things that would fit would be the Great Northern War/Spanish Succession War. Polish Succession War/Persian Civil War and later Nader Shah. Or the Seven Years' War |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 8, 2016 9:58:31 GMT
As is Gaul or Germania? Because I know 100% that there was a Confederacy of Germania, just wasn't called Confederacy. Are you sure? Anyway, the whole thing also wouldn't really fit into easytech game series. The only things that would fit would be the Great Northern War/Spanish Succession War. Polish Succession War/Persian Civil War and later Nader Shah. Or the Seven Years' War I guess, but it would be one chill game nonetheless. |
|
