|
|
Post by Washington on Nov 4, 2016 22:18:48 GMT
Simple, guess infamous phrases from historical documents/rulings
Political documents ARE allowed, but no 1991 (year ofc) documents onwards
Also great to answer feedback
To start of a very easy one
"We The People"
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Nov 4, 2016 22:36:33 GMT
Political documents can include Laws/Acts, and 2000 is a bit recent for that. Maybe you should set the line at 1991, or even 1966, to avoid salt.
It's up to you and Batten, though
|
|
|
|
Post by Stonewall Jackson on Nov 4, 2016 22:52:09 GMT
The idea sounds great, but I agree with Jean-Luc Picard , it should probably be earlier instead of 2000. I would make in 1962 IMO
And it was Gouverneur Morris who wrote that in the Constitution |
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Nov 5, 2016 2:08:17 GMT
lol, I thought you meant 2000 years ago (Christian birth and all that) and assumed this was some sort of jab at the bible for whatever reason. even though the only way that would make sense is banning things that are 2000+ years old.
I think 1991 would make sense, as I believe that is the forum limit for events becoming unallowed, so why not for documents. However if anyone has a good reason why 1991 is too recent, well thats fine with me. 2000 seems too close.
your question's answer I think is the american constitution. funny that if you search it up you get people using "we the people" for their own stuff, rather than the one that started it all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Nov 5, 2016 2:30:04 GMT
lol, I thought you meant 2000 years ago (Christian birth and all that) and assumed this was some sort of jab at the bible for whatever reason. even though the only way that would make sense is banning things that are 2000+ years old. I think 1991 would make sense, as I believe that is the forum limit for events becoming unallowed, so why not for documents. However if anyone has a good reason why 1991 is too recent, well thats fine with me. 2000 seems too close. your question's answer I think is the american constitution. funny that if you search it up you get people using "we the people" for their own stuff, rather than the one that started it all. 1991 is 25 years ago, and a good limit, although 1966 is safer. Ultimately, it's up to the board's Moderator ( Mountbatten) |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 5, 2016 14:45:17 GMT
1991 and before is accepted
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Nov 6, 2016 1:34:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Nov 6, 2016 11:44:43 GMT
The idea sounds great, but I agree with Jean-Luc Picard , it should probably be earlier instead of 2000. I would make in 1962 IMO
And it was Gouverneur Morris who wrote that in the Constitution Your Turn! Yes I will change to 1991 |
|
|
|
Post by Stonewall Jackson on Nov 7, 2016 21:19:33 GMT
Alright, this one is a piece of cake.
"We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal"
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 7, 2016 23:03:08 GMT
Alright, this one is a piece of cake.
"We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal" Declaration of Indpendence |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Nov 8, 2016 16:35:06 GMT
Alright, this one is a piece of cake.
"We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal" Declaration of Indpendence Your turn then |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 8, 2016 17:03:44 GMT
Declaration of Indpendence Your turn then pass |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Nov 14, 2016 10:54:22 GMT
I feel like certain things should be fully banned here if they still have or have recently had effects that are still been felt even if they were made many years ago. For example stuff like Apartheid which although many of its acts were passed before 1966 even.
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Nov 15, 2016 20:21:47 GMT
I feel like certain things should be fully banned here if they still have or have recently had effects that are still been felt even if they were made many years ago. For example stuff like Apartheid which although many of its acts were passed before 1966 even. and stuff written by controversial dictators and their supporters like Communist Manifesto or Mien Kampf too. It would be logical. |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Nov 24, 2016 21:43:01 GMT
I feel like certain things should be fully banned here if they still have or have recently had effects that are still been felt even if they were made many years ago. For example stuff like Apartheid which although many of its acts were passed before 1966 even. and stuff written by controversial dictators and their supporters like Communist Manifesto or Mien Kampf too. It would be logical. Sorry to burst your bubble, but its spelt "Mein" Mien is an english word meaning "a person's look or manner, especially one of a particular kind indicating their character or mood." |
|
