Post by best75 on Jan 24, 2017 21:38:29 GMT
there are some generals in my group I don't want to upgrade to 6 stars.
Bismarck
I feel like the new skill gained is not worth losing the old one. A artillery generals main purpose is to target fortifications, not targeting cavalry. This skill just goes against what Bismarck is meant to do. The lost of his pervious skill that does not let enemy attack back is a pretty big deal. He's gonna lose a lot of survivability and be less effective now since he's losing more HP.
Catherine
This one is a matter of preference. The upgrade turns her into a archer killer but I prefer to keep her a cavalry killer.
Washington
I felt moments where I think I should upgrade when targeted by many archers. The current skill even at 30% no enemy attack it seems to activate more often than that for me, so it's pretty useful. There also the fact upgrading costs 2000 medals. I don't think this is an effective way to spend my medals on a skill I might or might not want.
Bismarck
I feel like the new skill gained is not worth losing the old one. A artillery generals main purpose is to target fortifications, not targeting cavalry. This skill just goes against what Bismarck is meant to do. The lost of his pervious skill that does not let enemy attack back is a pretty big deal. He's gonna lose a lot of survivability and be less effective now since he's losing more HP.
Catherine
This one is a matter of preference. The upgrade turns her into a archer killer but I prefer to keep her a cavalry killer.
Washington
I felt moments where I think I should upgrade when targeted by many archers. The current skill even at 30% no enemy attack it seems to activate more often than that for me, so it's pretty useful. There also the fact upgrading costs 2000 medals. I don't think this is an effective way to spend my medals on a skill I might or might not want.
Always liked that. 
