|
Post by forhonor on Mar 23, 2017 0:50:13 GMT
Okay thanks man
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 1:03:30 GMT
I have Genghis Khan and Attila, I have two devices and Attila is good but so is genghis, he is a great replacement for Khan if you do not want to spend money but as other iap gens they are better than non IAP generals, but yes Attila cav commander is far better of a skill as he can help other cavalry
|
|
|
Post by forhonor on Mar 23, 2017 1:11:13 GMT
I bought the paladin sword in the early stages. So I have like 1185 medals. Ghengas is going to be my long term investment.
|
|
|
Post by TK421 on Mar 23, 2017 16:22:53 GMT
Attila loses his +80% damage to infantry at lvl 5 but gets it back at lvl 6. And Genghis gets +100% damage to infantry. 20% more. So silly to me. So many nomad cavalry generals get stomp, but Atilla gets his 80%. He is a solid general, almost like they realized that and left him with his special ability instead of the stronger version. Genghis will pull ahead though, so upgrade him if you want instant value. Well, as stated, all of the IAP generals are the best in their field. So, yeah, Genghis should take priority over Attila.
|
|