|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2017 22:47:54 GMT
The Spanish Civil War might be an option as first axis or allies campaign mission. The Far East Soviet cities can be added like Khabarovsk, it's added in the conquest of 1950 and maybe some other cities like Vladivostok but it's optional. The Guyana colonies can be added too, France, Netherlands and the UK owned those colonies in WW2. PM me to talk About the generals to add I can't PM and idk why Edit: Nvm it is fixed.
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Apr 27, 2017 22:51:28 GMT
Something that always annoyed me about the vanilla games city placement, was Novosibirsk. In game Novosibirsk is a 12 gold level 1 city with no industry. When in reality its the third largest city in Russia, and was already the largest in Siberia before world war 2. Edit: Forgot to mention that Novosibirsk was a major industrial center, so giving it no artillery or tanks makes no sense IMO. Could add Novosibirsk with more accuracy, and Khabarovsk. I don't believe Vladivostok was in game, and I don't see the need for it honestly. Not like Soviets were THAT strong in Asia. Edit: I'd also like to know what Frederick the Great thinks about Canada and Australia. I'm leaning towards having them be their own countries. Thanks for pitching in Fred.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2017 23:27:14 GMT
Something that always annoyed me about the vanilla games city placement, was Novosibirsk. In game Novosibirsk is a 12 gold level 1 city with no industry. When in reality its the third largest city in Russia, and was already the largest in Siberia before world war 2. Edit: Forgot to mention that Novosibirsk was a major industrial center, so giving it no artillery or tanks makes no sense IMO. Could add Novosibirsk with more accuracy, and Khabarovsk. I don't believe Vladivostok was in game, and I don't see the need for it honestly. Not like Soviets were THAT strong in Asia. Edit: I'd also like to know what Frederick the Great thinks about Canada and Australia. I'm leaning towards having them be their own countries. Thanks for pitching in Fred. Yeah but maybe instead of making Vladivostok a city, it can be a naval port. The other Soviet naval ports in the Far East can be removed.
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Apr 28, 2017 0:00:03 GMT
I think both Canada and Australia should be their own country for both historical and gameplay reasons (gameplay so that the UK isn't too powerful).
I also think Vladivostok should have a city and a naval port to give Russia something in that area.
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Apr 28, 2017 0:07:33 GMT
Khabarovsk is basically the same population as Vladivostok anyway, slightly smaller, but I will certainly support a Naval port in that area. Maybe easier to create an port?
If Canada and Australia stay in the game as nations, perhaps that will be easier to do. Dunno.
|
|
|
Post by Aleksandr Vasilevsky on Apr 28, 2017 2:10:09 GMT
Hopefully, this mod will satisfy my taste for historical accuracy in WC3 so that I don't need to mod But anyways, does that mean you will add generals to many different countries or just continue centering around Germany (asking this since I compiled an entire list of Soviet, Chinese, and German generals )
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Apr 28, 2017 2:15:08 GMT
Hopefully, this mod will satisfy my taste for historical accuracy in WC3 so that I don't need to mod But anyways, does that mean you will add generals to many different countries or just continue centering around Germany (asking this since I compiled an entire list of Soviet, Chinese, and German generals ) I'd prefer German and it will center around them, but Axis generals will be included
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2017 7:52:12 GMT
Hopefully, this mod will satisfy my taste for historical accuracy in WC3 so that I don't need to mod But anyways, does that mean you will add generals to many different countries or just continue centering around Germany (asking this since I compiled an entire list of Soviet, Chinese, and German generals ) PM me the generals and I'll look at them.
|
|
|
Post by Junio Valerio Borghese on Apr 28, 2017 8:42:34 GMT
I think both Canada and Australia should be their own country for both historical and gameplay reasons (gameplay so that the UK isn't too powerful). I also think Vladivostok should have a city and a naval port to give Russia something in that area. Maybe UK would become too powerful if we add camada and austriala under his control, but for example in 1940 conquest it would be very difficult for UK to survive alone against Germany (almost as big as in 1943, only wiithout russian cities) and italy together ..
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2017 10:12:11 GMT
I think both Canada and Australia should be their own country for both historical and gameplay reasons (gameplay so that the UK isn't too powerful). I also think Vladivostok should have a city and a naval port to give Russia something in that area. Maybe UK would become too powerful if we add camada and austriala under his control, but for example in 1940 conquest it would be very difficult for UK to survive alone against Germany (almost as big as in 1943, only wiithout russian cities) and italy together .. The UK can also have the colonies that aren't added yet like British Guyana etc. The other commonwealth countries like Canada and Australia can get 1 more general or more for example Australia gets a general in Port Moresby and the Canadians get a naval general, land or air
|
|
|
Post by Aleksandr Vasilevsky on Apr 28, 2017 10:25:05 GMT
Maybe UK would become too powerful if we add camada and austriala under his control, but for example in 1940 conquest it would be very difficult for UK to survive alone against Germany (almost as big as in 1943, only wiithout russian cities) and italy together .. The UK can also have the colonies that aren't added yet like British Guyana etc. The other commonwealth countries like Canada and Australia can get 1 more general or more for example Australia gets a general in Port Moresby and the Canadians get a naval general, land or air Does this mean that minor Allied get a bit of generals? That's going to be great, but I guess for balancing, does this mean that the major Allied Powers (USSR, GB, US, etc) won't be seeing new generals?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2017 10:29:47 GMT
The UK can also have the colonies that aren't added yet like British Guyana etc. The other commonwealth countries like Canada and Australia can get 1 more general or more for example Australia gets a general in Port Moresby and the Canadians get a naval general, land or air Does this mean that minor Allied get a bit of generals? That's going to be great, but I guess for balancing, does this mean that the major Allied Powers (USSR, GB, US, etc) won't be seeing new generals? We don't know yet about the generals for the major Allied powers but we will add them if needed.
|
|
|
Post by Junio Valerio Borghese on Apr 28, 2017 10:41:27 GMT
How conquest in 1942-1943-1944-1945 may look like : .org/image/m183eed4r/] [/url] ________[[[[1939]]]] DIPLOMACY CHANGES: ITALY NOT IN WAR, USA NOT IN WAR, EGYPT ,INDIA AND AUSTRALIA OWNED BY ENGLAND, USA NOT IN WAR, URSS NOT IN WAR ., GREECE NOT IN WAR , SPAIN NOT IN WAR . GERMANY SHOULD HAVE MORE U-BOT. JAKARTA AND THE REST OF SOUTH-EAST ASIA OWNED BY THE NETHERLANDS. JAPAN ONLY IN WAR WITH CHINA (IF POSSIBLE) , CANADA IN ALLIES, SPAIN NOT IN WAR (SAME PHOTOS AS IN THE FIRST POST IN THIS THREAD ) _____[[[[1940]]] - italy in war,greece in war, same changes as in 1939, map changes as shown in the photo (SAME PHOTOS AS IN THE FIRST POST IN THIS THREAD ) [[[[1941]]]] USA IN WAR, URSS IN WAR, JAPAN IN AXIS, THAILAND IN AXIS, ROMANIA IN AXIS, HUNGARY IN AXIS, GREECE IN WAR, territory changes as shown , spain not in war (SAME PHOTOS AS IN THE FIRST POST IN THIS THREAD ) [[[1942]]] diplomacy changes : spain not in war. Terrytory changes as shown in photo ( for africa, germany ) i dont know the situation between japan/china so someone should add it. .org/image/tspgo30xn/] [/url] .org/image/66qzjztmn/] [/url] [[[1943]]] now use the 1943 basic map. usa musnt have nukes and missiles. uk own egypt, india, australia. [[[1944]]] use the basic map in conquest 1944 from the mod ''glory of soldiers'' , need to modify italy that still owned rome in 1944. no nukes, missiles and lvl 4 industries only in berlin. .org/image/wjemtis4p/] [/url] .org/image/ctq9chd2v/] [/url] .org/image/l0i94235j/] [/url] [[[1945]]] territory changes, USA OWNS NUKES, missiles and lvl 4 industry only in berlin .org/image/vmy9a5qjp/] [/url] .org/image/su51q4q79/] [/url] .org/image/uzzckmtnp/] [/url]
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2017 23:55:52 GMT
1:And vichy france? 2:merge it with comintern mod
|
|
|
Post by VeniceBall on Apr 29, 2017 0:07:09 GMT
For 1939 make Indonesia dutch? and mayybe make the Aluetian Islands Campaign an Option?
|
|