|
|
Post by Junio Valerio Borghese on Apr 27, 2017 16:14:53 GMT
Hello, me and Bismarck Jr are working on a new mod that will be released soon based on axis. Conquests will be playable in 1939-1940-41-42-43-44-45 , it will be much more historically accurate. Atm we are working on the diplomacy and territory changes in 1939-40-41, soon we will work on changes in 42-43-44-45 , maybe if you find any mistake you can let us know so it will be as accurate as possible. ________[[[[1939]]]] DIPLOMACY CHANGES: ITALY NOT IN WAR, USA NOT IN WAR, EGYPT OWNED BY ENGLAND, USA NOT IN WAR, URSS NOT IN WAR . (MAYBE INDIA SHOULD BE OWNED BY ENGLAND, MAYBE GERMANY SHOULD HAVE MORE U-BOT ) , JAPAN ONLY IN WAR WITH CHINA (IF POSSIBLE) , AUSTRALIA NOT IN WAR, CANADA NOT IN WAR, SPAIN NOT IN WAR ________[[[[1940]]] - italy in war, same changes as in 1939, map changes as shown in the photo (-GERMANY 1940 - GERMNAY 1940 FRANCE - GERMNAY 1940 NORWAY) SPAIN NOT IN WAR .org/image/40ykcprep/]  [/url] .org/image/3ph3zyayp/]  [/url] .org/image/izgz756gx/]  [/url] ________[[[[1941]]]] USA IN WAR, URSS IN WAR, JAPAN IN AXIS, THAILAND IN AXIS, ROMANIA IN AXIS, HUNGARY IN AXIS, GREECE IN WAR, territory changes as shown (africa 1941, germany 1941 ) spain not in war .org/image/p5eqlej3t/]  [/url] .org/image/3x5nhpu0p/]  [/url] |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Apr 27, 2017 16:21:15 GMT
This is being merged with Kulturkampf.
|
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Apr 27, 2017 16:36:18 GMT
Huh. Nice that UK takes Egypt.
Instead of them owning India, I'd rather see Canada/Australia in the war. Both joined almost instantly after UK did, it doesn't really make sense for them not to.
Plus even with India, no USSR or USA should make Axis way too strong. IMO, haven't tested it obviously.
|
|
|
|
Post by Junio Valerio Borghese on Apr 27, 2017 16:40:44 GMT
Huh. Nice that UK takes Egypt. Instead of them owning India, I'd rather see Canada/Australia in the war. Both joined almost instantly after UK did, it doesn't really make sense for them not to. Plus even with India, no USSR or USA should make Axis way too strong. IMO, haven't tested it obviously. Thank you for your suggestion. I think you're right, we should put australia and india in the war. About the game balance, we don't care about it, we just want it to be as much accurate as possible  In 1944-1945 i think you will not think that axis is too strong anymore I am a bit ignorant about UK history in the 40's , but if they owned australia, india, canada then we should make them own theese countries. If theese country were already '' independent'' then they may join allies. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2017 18:49:11 GMT
I have a suggestion, Indonesia should be owned by the Netherlands instead of the UK so it would be more historically accurate. I also would like to help with information and creating generals etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Apr 27, 2017 18:57:47 GMT
I have a suggestion, Indonesia should be owned by the Netherlands instead of the UK so it would be more historically accurate. I also would like to help with information and creating generals etc. Send me a PM later and we can talk about campaigns, ok? |
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Apr 27, 2017 19:10:06 GMT
Seems like a great Idea @thasnaily. After all, UK will have Egypt, maybe India. It could represent the people who fought Germany while in exile, as the actual Netherlands is doomed to fall. Plus the Dutch who fought the Japanese, of course. Junio Valerio Borghese, I see. You are looking for the most important accuracy. The lesser accuracy would be if Germany is TOO strong, then that would be inaccurate. Its more than just game balance, but you are correct. India was never independent, and so should join UK. Canada? It was created as a country on 1867, but fully got rid of British influence (such as needing UK to change the constitution) in 1982. You could include it as UK, or leave it as Canada, since it became a dominion by that time. In fact, It didn't join world war 2 instantly, because unlike ww1 the leaders wanted to send a message that they chose to enter war, not the UK. It did join in a few days though. Australia? Unlike Frederick the Great I'm not Australian, so I don't really know. Apparently It became a country around 1901, independent by 1931, but this one article here claims it basically didn't happen until 1986. Essentially same as Canada then, maybe less independent. The article: www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/we-only-became-independent-of-britain-on-this-day-in-1986/news-story/524a277d666ca0614eedcb39a43a9e12 |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2017 19:12:51 GMT
The Spanish Civil War might be an option as first axis or allies campaign mission.
The Far East Soviet cities can be added like Khabarovsk, it's added in the conquest of 1950 and maybe some other cities like Vladivostok but it's optional.
The Guyana colonies can be added too, France, Netherlands and the UK owned those colonies in WW2.
|
|
|
|
Post by Junio Valerio Borghese on Apr 27, 2017 19:17:16 GMT
The Spanish Civil War might be an option as first axis or allies campaign mission. The Far East Soviet cities can be added like Khabarovsk, it's added in the conquest of 1950 and maybe some other cities like Vladivostok but it's optional. The Guyana colonies can be added too, France, Netherlands and the UK owned those colonies in WW2.Yes we will add colonies in guyana and we will also add eastern cities in soviet union ( this will made soviet union stronger in 1942-1943 , or they have low income from cities. I think we will also improve the cities ( maybe the level, but im sure about the industries ) because with the war urss mooved his production at the east of moscow Will also remove nukes in 1943 ( only in 1945 owned by usa ) and we will also make it possible to build super tank and launch missiles in german cities . |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Apr 27, 2017 19:21:37 GMT
The Spanish Civil War might be an option as first axis or allies campaign mission. The Far East Soviet cities can be added like Khabarovsk, it's added in the conquest of 1950 and maybe some other cities like Vladivostok but it's optional. The Guyana colonies can be added too, France, Netherlands and the UK owned those colonies in WW2.Yes we will add colonies in guyana and we will also add eastern cities in soviet union ( this will made soviet union stronger in 1942-1943 , or they have low income from cities. I think we will also improve the cities ( maybe the level, but im sure about the industries ) because with the war urss mooved his production at the east of moscow Will also remove nukes in 1943 ( only in 1945 owned by usa ) and we will also make it possible to build super tank and launch missiles in german cities . Note that I dont know how to make cities yet |
|
|
|
Post by Junio Valerio Borghese on Apr 27, 2017 19:28:54 GMT
Seems like a great Idea @thasnaily . After all, UK will have Egypt, maybe India. It could represent the people who fought Germany while in exile, as the actual Netherlands is doomed to fall. Plus the Dutch who fought the Japanese, of course. Junio Valerio Borghese , I see. You are looking for the most important accuracy. The lesser accuracy would be if Germany is TOO strong, then that would be inaccurate. Its more than just game balance, but you are correct. India was never independent, and so should join UK. Canada? It was created as a country on 1867, but fully got rid of British influence (such as needing UK to change the constitution) in 1982. You could include it as UK, or leave it as Canada, since it became a dominion by that time. In fact, It didn't join world war 2 instantly, because unlike ww1 the leaders wanted to send a message that they chose to enter war, not the UK. It did join in a few days though. Australia? Unlike Frederick the Great I'm not Australian, so I don't really know. Apparently It became a country around 1901, independent by 1931, but this one article here claims it basically didn't happen until 1986. Essentially same as Canada then, maybe less independent. The article: www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/we-only-became-independent-of-britain-on-this-day-in-1986/news-story/524a277d666ca0614eedcb39a43a9e12Thank you for your answer. I think that we will include canada, india and australia under UK control ( and maybe we will reduce the city level, or Uk will have an incredible gold and steel income!! Btw, i don't think that making a germany too strong is inaccurate, because they managed to keep head to the whoole world almost alone and for a long period . In the end they lost but until 1943 the war was still undecided. Anyway we will try to make everything as much accurate as possible. If germany had super tank and missiles in 1943, we will make it possible to use them from berlin. Other countries didnt have it, so they will neither have theese tecnologies in game . P.s. Can't wait to play Germany 1945 and ''joint counterback" (like against alien 08 ) , or in other words, i want to counterattack and win. Will also add Italian social republic in 1944-1945 ( owning rome and milan in 1944 and only Milan ( northern city) in 1945 ) we will add a port next to Venice. Uk or Usa will own sicily, naples and Rome.. |
|
|
|
Post by Junio Valerio Borghese on Apr 27, 2017 19:29:25 GMT
Note that I dont know how to make cities yet The chinese will do it for you mate  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2017 19:30:03 GMT
Note that I dont know how to make cities yet Well do you know how to add existing cities in WC3 to conquests? You could possibly add the city Khabarovsk, that city is added in the conquest in 1950 in the Soviet Far East area but idk the code of that city :/ |
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Apr 27, 2017 19:40:20 GMT
I believe @communist had made a mod once with eastern Soviet cities in world war 2, but there were glitches. I don't know if he fixed it or abandoned the idea.
Of course, perhaps the Chinese are better at it.
Anyway, I would support lowering at least the capital cities of Egypt, India, maybe Australia and Canada. +65 is given to capitals, not regional powerhouses. They could have +48, as is usual.
I wouldn't be SURPRISED if Canada actually is considered independent by 1939, but if nobody complains I will accept it being UK. It certainly was a vassal of UK.
As for Super Tanks, I'm not sure who had the best tank of world war 2, but the USA and USSR were focused on quantity, not quality. Thus I can understand Germany having Super Tanks as long as US/UK/USSR have heavy tanks.
The ww2 Germans are famous for their missile uses, as far as I know they are the only ones to use legitimate missiles. Could be wrong.
I like the Idea of UK/USA taking control of most/southern Italian cities at some point. Perhaps they can share? I know the Canadians fought at one place, no doubt the other British forces did.
|
|
|
|
Post by Junio Valerio Borghese on Apr 27, 2017 19:44:23 GMT
Everything's good, and im sure that germans had best tanks in ww2 . Maybe the cost of normal tanks for soviet-usa may be decreased to only 100 gold ( so they can produce more ), this is also historically accurate. 50 M4 sherman vs 1 PANZER-6 TIGER 2 in ardenne's offensive |
|
