|
|
Post by Erich von Ludendorff on Jun 22, 2017 23:02:29 GMT
it's called FTFY And you were going to fix me? Nah Fixed It For You. Naw, I is of correct am irrelevant yes? |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jun 23, 2017 0:09:33 GMT
Fixed It For You. Naw, I is of correct am irrelevant yes? Irrelevant how? You corrected me and yet I was saying it right... o.O |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jun 23, 2017 3:24:53 GMT
If anyone who has the Conspiracy app wants to join up for a second EFC tourney game, feel free to tag me or Bismarck Jr! |
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Jun 23, 2017 4:17:38 GMT
I might go on a post about a unreliable/crap ally soon if things go a certain way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jun 23, 2017 4:36:54 GMT
I might go on a post about a unreliable/crap ally soon if things go a certain way. Talking about your USA game in Call of War or Dip06? |
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Jun 23, 2017 5:03:52 GMT
I might go on a post about a unreliable/crap ally soon if things go a certain way. Talking about your USA game in Call of War or Dip06? Call of war. If you are wondering that ally is the uk. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Ludendorff on Jun 23, 2017 5:20:40 GMT
If anyone of interested, I have made a private game on conspiracy. If you want to play, write your username and I'll send you the request to join.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Jun 23, 2017 12:34:11 GMT
Amak has 5 tons of ammunition needing to be gotten rid of. The price is negotiable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Ludendorff on Jun 23, 2017 12:53:41 GMT
Daily reminder that Iberia shall be Muslim no matter what happens! #crusades_game
|
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Jun 23, 2017 13:02:14 GMT
The Tiger II was the successor to the Tiger I, combining the latter's thick armour with the armour sloping used on the Panther medium tank. The tank weighed almost 70 tonnes, and was protected by 100 to 185 mm (3.9 to 7.3 in) of armour to the front. It was armed with the long barrelled 8.8 cm KwK 43 L/71 anti-tank cannon. The chassis was also the basis for the Jagdtiger turretless tank destroyer.
The Tiger II was issued to heavy tank battalions of the Army and the Waffen-SS. It was first used in combat with 503rd Heavy Panzer Battalion during the Allied Invasion of Normandy on 11 July 1944; on the Eastern Front, the first unit to be outfitted with Tiger IIs was the 501st Heavy Panzer Battalion, which by 1 September 1944 listed 25 Tiger IIs operational.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Ludendorff on Jun 23, 2017 13:04:19 GMT
The Tiger II was the successor to the Tiger I, combining the latter's thick armour with the armour sloping used on the Panther medium tank. The tank weighed almost 70 tonnes, and was protected by 100 to 185 mm (3.9 to 7.3 in) of armour to the front. It was armed with the long barrelled 8.8 cm KwK 43 L/71 anti-tank cannon. The chassis was also the basis for the Jagdtiger turretless tank destroyer. The Tiger II was issued to heavy tank battalions of the Army and the Waffen-SS. It was first used in combat with 503rd Heavy Panzer Battalion during the Allied Invasion of Normandy on 11 July 1944; on the Eastern Front, the first unit to be outfitted with Tiger IIs was the 501st Heavy Panzer Battalion, which by 1 September 1944 listed 25 Tiger IIs operational. 100% random. Almohad still stronk remove northern Christians! |
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Jun 23, 2017 13:14:08 GMT
The Tiger II was the successor to the Tiger I, combining the latter's thick armour with the armour sloping used on the Panther medium tank. The tank weighed almost 70 tonnes, and was protected by 100 to 185 mm (3.9 to 7.3 in) of armour to the front. It was armed with the long barrelled 8.8 cm KwK 43 L/71 anti-tank cannon. The chassis was also the basis for the Jagdtiger turretless tank destroyer. The Tiger II was issued to heavy tank battalions of the Army and the Waffen-SS. It was first used in combat with 503rd Heavy Panzer Battalion during the Allied Invasion of Normandy on 11 July 1944; on the Eastern Front, the first unit to be outfitted with Tiger IIs was the 501st Heavy Panzer Battalion, which by 1 September 1944 listed 25 Tiger IIs operational. T-34 stronk we war yuo! ____
__________/____\__
_/ Священная \
█████████████████████████|█| война Т-34 \ ______
__\___________________\_____|██████|
/ |███| |██████|
________/_____________________________________\____
/_/[]\______________________________________________\_
\__/ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / [] \/
\ | [] | | [] | | [] | | [] | | [] | \____/
\__\____/__\____/__\____/__\____/_\____/____/ |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Jun 23, 2017 14:32:22 GMT
The US wanted to nuke Japan even more if Destination: Tokyo aka Operation Downfall had occured.
And, in the wiki page on it, Allied to Axis force ratio was 1:6 with the Japs having miltia 5 times as much as the Allied task force size. (Note: this Allied troop count excluded USSR whose intentions are still unsure and only has British Commonwealth forces with the bulk probably being US troops.)
Biological warfare was seriously considered by the Allies but despite this, had the Japs fought on, the causualties would probably be equal to the casualty count of the Top 100 bloodiest battles in history.
As the effects of nukes were still largely unknown, had the planners and gens listened to Col. Lyle E. Seeman, dropping nukes here and there & rushing into nuked areas after at least 48 hours what cost do you think the soldiers then would pay?
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jun 23, 2017 14:40:43 GMT
If anyone of interested, I have made a private game on conspiracy. If you want to play, write your username and I'll send you the request to join. Desophaeus |
|
|
|
Post by Der Kaiserreich on Jun 23, 2017 14:45:47 GMT
The US wanted to nuke Japan even more if Destination: Tokyo aka Operation Downfall had occured. And, in the wiki page on it, Allied to Axis force ratio was 1:6 with the Japs having miltia 5 times as much as the Allied task force size. (Note: this Allied troop count excluded USSR whose intentions are still unsure and only has British Commonwealth forces with the bulk probably being US troops.) Biological warfare was seriously considered by the Allies but despite this, had the Japs fought on, the causualties would probably be equal to the casualty count of the Top 100 bloodiest battles in history. As the effects of nukes were still largely unknown, had the planners and gens listened to Col. Lyle E. Seeman, dropping nukes here and there & rushing into nuked areas after at least 48 hours what cost do you think the soldiers then would pay? If the soldiers had really rushed into nuked areas 48 hours after the nuking I would have shot Col. Lyle E. Seeman, and if he survives... well, he's shot again. I mean lets face it. Sending soldiers into a nuked area? First off no one would be nearby, even less pose a threat. Then all the soldiers die as well... hmm... reminds me of when the Scots invaded England when they were suffering the plaque and the Scots ended up like those they were attacking. |
|
