|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Aug 24, 2017 10:43:23 GMT
Does Brisbane exist? Is Blamey guarding it? Is he still annoying?  hes still there Damn Brisbane is Brisbane hard again😂 |
|
|
|
Post by Minnesotaball on Aug 24, 2017 15:10:02 GMT
To be worse the is a battleship parked right next to Brisbane.....what's next anti air missile?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Aug 24, 2017 15:43:10 GMT
But tbh Australia looks a nice setup this time
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Aug 24, 2017 19:23:29 GMT
You can build missilo silos to launch missilos once your tech level reaches level 7 so I don't think Brisbane will be as annoying.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reichtangle on Aug 25, 2017 2:13:52 GMT
Ugh,I really hate Brisbane.I have to cross the Pacific because the Japanese was unreliable.Good thing I conquered America. AGREED. And the most flipping thing is that it isnt in bombers range, actually have to get a tank or somethin' to kill blamey the stupid bastard. I almost didnt get the Alhambra wonder because of Blamey.He even sustained my Ion Attack.Luckily,the Ion reduce his health for my Commando to attack |
|
|
|
Post by Thomas Blamey on Jan 26, 2018 6:51:13 GMT
You can build missilo silos to launch missilos once your tech level reaches level 7 so I don't think Brisbane will be as annoying. also on most of my 1939 runs Blamey moves (to take Tokyo) with America and India my guess is every Single Russian City past Sacrtov (or what ever the city is called) |
|
|
|
Post by odm on Jan 26, 2018 6:59:34 GMT
Yeah, he ussually moves from there. It is actually a good thing that the city is on the coast because it can be easily taken down by bombarding with Cruisers.
By the way, ports are more annoying to take , especially the one in Mexico in 1939 and those in north Canada.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tadamichi Kuribayashi on Jan 26, 2018 13:08:40 GMT
I think that in WC4, Brisbane is somewhat easier to take if you just spam missiles and/or nukes. I still would agree though, that Brisbane is more annoying than many others. I am also going to nominate another city: Budapest. Why Budapest? Imagine you are a more experienced nooblet who is doing quite fine on a conquest as some Allied country 1939 or 1943. Now, you have finally reached Europe and beat down a bunch of Germans. And then the Italian-Bulgarian-Romanian army comes...Now imagine you are in the fight for your life, trying to survive the heavy tank-inf-arty spam. The entire line just boils down into losing and recapturing cities. The front just so happens to be Bucharest-Budapest-Munich. Budapest has the most fighting.
|
|
|
|
Post by odm on Jan 26, 2018 16:11:00 GMT
Also the American islands are hard to take in 1939 but less so in later era because with upgrades it allows you to paradrop on them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Der Kommandeur on Jan 27, 2018 2:01:17 GMT
The american islands are the most annoying for me, especially Hawaii, where Arnold keeps air raiding the troops that went there trying to capture it. Also, that northernmost canadian town in the east in extremely difficult if you don’t attack Canada from the east coast/Kuujjuaq.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Jan 27, 2018 3:06:06 GMT
The american islands are the most annoying for me, especially Hawaii, where Arnold keeps air raiding the troops that went there trying to capture it. Also, that northernmost canadian town in the east in extremely difficult if you don’t attack Canada from the east coast/Kuujjuaq. Agreed on all 3 cities. When I play as a faction that is also anti-USA, I MUST either have control of Tokyo or sail all the way to the islands. When invading North America from the East or Northeast, that city is the hardest to strike since there's usually a coastal arty at Newfoundland & that we have to attack by sea. |
|
|
|
Post by cardbattler on Feb 5, 2018 11:24:26 GMT
Hawaii for me. Brisbane is not as difficult when there are several cities close by to paradrop (also paradrop range increases!). You can only reach Honolulu by Air from Midway, and you can only reach Midway by air from Japan!
|
|
