|
Post by ray on Sept 14, 2017 1:00:13 GMT
Could this mean Iraqi-Iran war? .org/image/o2dqkncxx/] [/url]
|
|
|
Post by Minnesotaball on Sept 14, 2017 1:57:48 GMT
Could this mean Iraqi-Iran war? Possibly. Where did you find this in game? Because in real life US supplied Iraq, we didn't fight with them, and I do not know why Egypt is there.
|
|
|
Post by TheWarDeclarer on Sept 14, 2017 3:06:03 GMT
Could this mean Iraqi-Iran war? Possibly. Where did you find this in game? Because in real life US supplied Iraq, we didn't fight with them, and I do not know why Egypt is there. I was intrigued too so i dug deeper in google and found that the United States supplied both sides. So in this case, maybe they joined Iraq's side because of Saudi Arabia..? Unlikely the reason and i'm still puzzled. Edit: I think this campaign is in one of the first two Missions of the Cold War turned Hot. The strange reason is there is no Soviets present so what's up with that lol? But if we dismiss the fact that no soviets were present i believe since the Americans were supporting alongside the Saudis, i think that went the war turned hot, the soviets backed the Iranians and the Americans joined as a full combatant in the war. Easytech should have added the Syrians as allies of the Iranians or at the very least the Soviets coming with some troops from the Caucasus region. Think of it like somewhat a proxy war.. If the soviets backed the Iranians and possibly pushed Nato out of the Middle East, they would gain the rich Oil fields there. It would sort of make sense considering there are a couple of Wto missions set in the Middle East..... Well either that or the campaign is set in the WW2 Era and the Iranians supported the Germans. But then this campaign mission would have to take place under the Axis Campaign but we don't see a Mission in the trailer hovering above or near the Middle East... Also it would have to take place before the Germans attacked the Soviets for obvious reasons... For Egypt, i found that they were providing International Aid to Iraq so maybe that is the reason EasyTech added them in to Iraq's side..? Source : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_WarSource : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_aid_to_combatants_in_the_Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_War
|
|
|
Post by Minnesotaball on Sept 14, 2017 3:14:45 GMT
Possibly. Where did you find this in game? Because in real life US supplied Iraq, we didn't fight with them, and I do not know why Egypt is there. I was intrigued too so i dug deeper in google and found that the United States supplied both sides. So in this case, maybe they joined Iraq's side because of Saudi Arabia..? Unlikely the reason and i'm still puzzled. For Egypt, i found that they were providing International Aid to Iraq so maybe that is the reason EasyTech added them in to Iraq's side..? Source : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_WarSource : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_aid_to_combatants_in_the_Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_WarI know the U.S. never gave equipment to Iraq, but they trained troops and gave intelligence. So yes they did support them, however not with weapons.
|
|
|
Post by TheWarDeclarer on Sept 14, 2017 3:20:42 GMT
I know the U.S. never gave equipment to Iraq, but they trained troops and gave intelligence. So yes they did support them, however not with weapons. Sorry i edited my response to your first response and didn't see your response to my response but i think i answered it in my edit
|
|
|
Post by deadman on Sept 14, 2017 3:32:46 GMT
Regardless of why its there this senario is better than the ones in wc3 where wto was already invading North America in the begining of the campaign.
|
|
|
Post by TheWarDeclarer on Sept 14, 2017 3:36:18 GMT
Regardless of why its there this senario is better than the ones in wc3 where wto was already invading North America in the begining of the campaign. That is so true They should have made it the last mission where they invade from both the Pacific and Atlantic and even from Central America (using cuba as a base) after conquering the rest of the World (except for Antarctica)
|
|
|
Post by ray on Sept 14, 2017 4:49:48 GMT
Post WW2 planes are in here meaning that it is not WW2 .org/image/psa98sshx/] [/url]
|
|
|
Post by ray on Sept 14, 2017 5:36:10 GMT
Possibly. Where did you find this in game? Because in real life US supplied Iraq, we didn't fight with them, and I do not know why Egypt is there. I was intrigued too so i dug deeper in google and found that the United States supplied both sides. So in this case, maybe they joined Iraq's side because of Saudi Arabia..? Unlikely the reason and i'm still puzzled. Edit: I think this campaign is in one of the first two Missions of the Cold War turned Hot. The strange reason is there is no Soviets present so what's up with that lol? But if we dismiss the fact that no soviets were present i believe since the Americans were supporting alongside the Saudis, i think that went the war turned hot, the soviets backed the Iranians and the Americans joined as a full combatant in the war. Easytech should have added the Syrians as allies of the Iranians or at the very least the Soviets coming with some troops from the Caucasus region. Think of it like somewhat a proxy war.. If the soviets backed the Iranians and possibly pushed Nato out of the Middle East, they would gain the rich Oil fields there. It would sort of make sense considering there are a couple of Wto missions set in the Middle East..... Well either that or the campaign is set in the WW2 Era and the Iranians supported the Germans. But then this campaign mission would have to take place under the Axis Campaign but we don't see a Mission in the trailer hovering above or near the Middle East... Also it would have to take place before the Germans attacked the Soviets for obvious reasons... For Egypt, i found that they were providing International Aid to Iraq so maybe that is the reason EasyTech added them in to Iraq's side..? Source : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_WarSource : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_aid_to_combatants_in_the_Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_WarSoviets are still an enemy in post WW2 .org/image/7jco5z29x/] [/url]
|
|
|
Post by TheWarDeclarer on Sept 14, 2017 6:03:50 GMT
Soviets are still an enemy in post WW2 Why are the soviets in the South East Asia region instead of the Chinese and why isn't there even any Chinese Navy supporting you!?
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Sept 14, 2017 9:55:46 GMT
Why are the soviets in the South East Asia region instead of the Chinese and why isn't there even any Chinese Navy supporting you!? I think this is a combination of the Vietnanese War of Independence & the Vietnam War.
|
|
|
Post by deadman on Sept 14, 2017 14:43:34 GMT
Regardless of why its there this senario is better than the ones in wc3 where wto was already invading North America in the begining of the campaign. That is so true They should have made it the last mission where they invade from both the Pacific and Atlantic and even from Central America (using cuba as a base) after conquering the rest of the World (except for Antarctica) No idea why didnt do it, it would have made so much more sense.
|
|