|
|
Post by ray on Sept 16, 2017 6:45:40 GMT
.org/image/rjlef6o91/]  [/url] |
|
|
|
Post by War Master on Sept 16, 2017 6:48:48 GMT
One of the challenges
|
|
|
|
Post by Minnesotaball on Sept 16, 2017 13:36:44 GMT
I think germany might just be like west controls all of Germany,or Soviets get Berlin
|
|
|
|
Post by Henri Winkelman on Sept 19, 2017 11:06:37 GMT
I personally think one of the following:
-4 sections: USA (north-west), France (south-west), UK (Central West) and USSR (East)
-2 sections: GDR (German Democratic Republic, East Germany) neutral in 1950, NATO in 1960 and FRG (Federal Republic of Germany), Neutral in 1950, WTO in 1960.
-Still Germany but neutral in 1950 but NATO in 1960, like in WC3
Personally, I hope Germany will be divided into 4 sectons in 1950 (described in possibility 1) and in 1960 divided into the GDR and the FRG (described in possibility 2), which is the most logical, cause of history.
But I think it will be like it is in WC3 (described in possibility 3).
|
|
|
|
Post by Leonid Govorov on Sept 20, 2017 6:49:51 GMT
I personally think one of the following: -4 sections: USA (north-west), France (south-west), UK (Central West) and USSR (East) -2 sections: GDR (German Democratic Republic, East Germany) neutral in 1950, NATO in 1960 and FRG (Federal Republic of Germany), Neutral in 1950, WTO in 1960. -Still Germany but neutral in 1950 but NATO in 1960, like in WC3 Personally, I hope Germany will be divided into 4 sectons in 1950 (described in possibility 1) and in 1960 divided into the GDR and the FRG (described in possibility 2), which is the most logical, cause of history. But I think it will be like it is in WC3 (described in possibility 3). There are West&east Germany( The Light Bringer saw it on files). I hope g ermany is devided in 2 though, if it gets devided by 4, USSR will be unstoppable(owning Berlin and all that) |
|
|
|
Post by Henri Winkelman on Sept 20, 2017 14:35:06 GMT
I personally think one of the following: -4 sections: USA (north-west), France (south-west), UK (Central West) and USSR (East) -2 sections: GDR (German Democratic Republic, East Germany) neutral in 1950, NATO in 1960 and FRG (Federal Republic of Germany), Neutral in 1950, WTO in 1960. -Still Germany but neutral in 1950 but NATO in 1960, like in WC3 Personally, I hope Germany will be divided into 4 sectons in 1950 (described in possibility 1) and in 1960 divided into the GDR and the FRG (described in possibility 2), which is the most logical, cause of history. But I think it will be like it is in WC3 (described in possibility 3). There are West&east Germany( The Light Bringer saw it on files). I hope g ermany is devided in 2 though, if it gets devided by 4, USSR will be unstoppable(owning Berlin and all that) Indeed, USSR will be very strong indeed, but for 1950 it will be historically accurate indeed. But that it is in the files doesnt mean everything, it might be a failed experiment or for a scenario, though I do not hope any of those 2 are the case. |
|
|
|
Post by Leonid Govorov on Sept 21, 2017 9:14:37 GMT
There are West&east Germany( The Light Bringer saw it on files). I hope g ermany is devided in 2 though, if it gets devided by 4, USSR will be unstoppable(owning Berlin and all that) Indeed, USSR will be very strong indeed, but for 1950 it will be historically accurate indeed. But that it is in the files doesnt mean everything, it might be a failed experiment or for a scenario, though I do not hope any of those 2 are the case. In that case, Ill go with USSR for the WTO side, but for NATO 1950... It will be tough. |
|
|
|
Post by Henri Winkelman on Sept 21, 2017 18:01:24 GMT
Well I dont know about that though, it takes a couple of turns for reinforcements to arive in east germany, remember, Poland will be between Germany and the Sovjet Union. So before reinforcements arive at Berlin, your east German cities are already under siege by the USA, France and Great Brittain.
|
|
|
|
Post by Minnesotaball on Sept 21, 2017 22:47:31 GMT
I just hope USA has a stronger presence in Europe. In wc3 they were too far away to help, and by then Soviets overrun the place.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Sept 21, 2017 23:11:30 GMT
I just hope USA has a stronger presence in Europe. In wc3 they were too far away to help, and by then Soviets overrun the place. Real historical situation, no?  "The problem of Scotland is that it is full of Scots" (с) Edward I «Longshanks», King of England It is normal that Soviets were much more powerful in Europe than the US. |
|
|
|
Post by Minnesotaball on Sept 21, 2017 23:37:24 GMT
I just hope USA has a stronger presence in Europe. In wc3 they were too far away to help, and by then Soviets overrun the place. Real historical situation, no? "The problem of Scotland is that it is full of Scots" (с) Edward I «Longshanks», King of England It is normal that Soviets were much more powerful in Europe than the US. While it was true Soviets were much stronger in europe, usa should have something to act as a launch pad in Europe. |
|
|
|
Post by soonerjbd on Sept 22, 2017 1:02:20 GMT
I just hope USA has a stronger presence in Europe. In wc3 they were too far away to help, and by then Soviets overrun the place. Real historical situation, no? "The problem of Scotland is that it is full of Scots" (с) Edward I «Longshanks», King of England It is normal that Soviets were much more powerful in Europe than the US. The U.S. had a major military presence in Europe during the Cold War. Air bases, army outposts, you name it. If the Russians had come pouring through Eastern Europe, they would have been met by U.S. air power and ground troops. The idea that U.S. Forces would have had to spends weeks crossing the Atlantic is absurd. |
|
|
|
Post by Minnesotaball on Sept 22, 2017 1:48:05 GMT
Real historical situation, no? "The problem of Scotland is that it is full of Scots" (с) Edward I «Longshanks», King of England It is normal that Soviets were much more powerful in Europe than the US. The U.S. had a major military presence in Europe during the Cold War. Air bases, army outposts, you name it. If the Russians had come pouring through Eastern Europe, they would have been met by U.S. air power and ground troops. The idea that U.S. Forces would have had to spends weeks crossing the Atlantic is absurd. Very true, I wish USA would have some territory under their control, hard to get forces over there, while they did have a major presence Soviets outnumbered them immensely and were closer to home, but alas USA was also powerful. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Sept 22, 2017 8:06:10 GMT
Real historical situation, no? "The problem of Scotland is that it is full of Scots" (с) Edward I «Longshanks», King of England It is normal that Soviets were much more powerful in Europe than the US. The U.S. had a major military presence in Europe during the Cold War. Air bases, army outposts, you name it. If the Russians had come pouring through Eastern Europe, they would have been met by U.S. air power and ground troops. The idea that U.S. Forces would have had to spends weeks crossing the Atlantic is absurd. During Cold War NATO was totally aware that in case Soviets attack Europe will most likely be lost in couple of weeks and it will be necessary to come back from Britain and from the Ocean. That is why it was very important not to let Soviets to act in the Atlantics. Norway navy path is still a strategic one. |
|
|
|
Post by Leonid Govorov on Sept 24, 2017 5:55:08 GMT
I just hope USA has a stronger presence in Europe. In wc3 they were too far away to help, and by then Soviets overrun the place. Real historical situation, no? "The problem of Scotland is that it is full of Scots" (с) Edward I «Longshanks», King of England It is normal that Soviets were much more powerful in Europe than the US. Good thing no actual war happened in Europe, or else we might be saluting our "GLORIOUS LEADER STALIN" |
|
