|
Post by Gaius Julius Caesar on Sept 20, 2017 18:17:49 GMT
I have Govorov, Guderian, Manstein, Patton, Yamamoto, and two ECs (one 4* art and other 4* tank). Should I sell Patton to upgrade my ECs or no?
|
|
|
Post by Minnesotaball on Sept 21, 2017 2:05:20 GMT
I have Govorov, Guderian, Manstein, Patton, Yamamoto, and two ECs (one 4* art and other 4* tank). Should I sell Patton to upgrade my ECs or no? I don't think you should. Patton is a awesome general. Your Generals are amazing. Patton is good for alien blitzing in conquest.
|
|
|
Post by Gaius Julius Caesar on Sept 21, 2017 4:38:38 GMT
I have Govorov, Guderian, Manstein, Patton, Yamamoto, and two ECs (one 4* art and other 4* tank). Should I sell Patton to upgrade my ECs or no? I don't think you should. Patton is a awesome general. Your Generals are amazing. Patton is good for alien blitzing in conquest. I've been told before that me having Patton is redundant. Patton is solely a general in the choosing path for his explosives, but since I have Manstein, he fills that role. Therefore, Patton only supports at this point. Overall, I'd personally say that ECs may end up being better in the long run so choosing to sell Patton isn't preposterous.
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 21, 2017 4:46:36 GMT
I don't think you should. Patton is a awesome general. Your Generals are amazing. Patton is good for alien blitzing in conquest. I've been told before that me having Patton is redundant. Patton is solely a general in the choosing path for his explosives, but since I have Manstein, he fills that role. Therefore, Patton only supports at this point. Overall, I'd personally say that ECs may end up being better in the long run so choosing to sell Patton isn't preposterous. In your old thread beneath I gave reasons why to keep Patton is not a bad idea european-war-4.boards.net/thread/3969/vatutin-patton
|
|
|
Post by Gaius Julius Caesar on Sept 21, 2017 5:48:32 GMT
I've been told before that me having Patton is redundant. Patton is solely a general in the choosing path for his explosives, but since I have Manstein, he fills that role. Therefore, Patton only supports at this point. Overall, I'd personally say that ECs may end up being better in the long run so choosing to sell Patton isn't preposterous. In your old thread beneath I gave reasons why to keep Patton is not a bad idea european-war-4.boards.net/thread/3969/vatutin-pattonYour reasoning was good, but I only need 3 generals minus ECs and Yamamoto, so I have to say I'd gain quite a bit of money to upgrade ECs
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 21, 2017 5:56:09 GMT
Your reasoning was good, but I only need 3 generals minus ECs and Yamamoto, so I have to say I'd gain quite a bit of money to upgrade ECs I've done all what I could
|
|
|
Post by Minnesotaball on Sept 21, 2017 11:52:06 GMT
I don't think you should. Patton is a awesome general. Your Generals are amazing. Patton is good for alien blitzing in conquest. I've been told before that me having Patton is redundant. Patton is solely a general in the choosing path for his explosives, but since I have Manstein, he fills that role. Therefore, Patton only supports at this point. Overall, I'd personally say that ECs may end up being better in the long run so choosing to sell Patton isn't preposterous. I guess if you have no need for him you can get rid of him. Good luck with the eye covers!
|
|