|
Post by The Light Bringer on Oct 1, 2017 21:54:20 GMT
So has anyone found out how the conquest quality classification is made, like when you get D and when S?
|
|
|
Post by soonerjbd on Oct 2, 2017 2:49:46 GMT
Well it gives you a score at the end based on how many generals you used, the star level of your country and the number of turns you took. I'm assuming it's based on the total score.
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Oct 2, 2017 3:17:59 GMT
Well it gives you a score at the end based on how many generals you used, the star level of your country and the number of turns you took. I'm assuming it's based on the total score. I don't think the star level of country effects the score. Besides the other two you mention the number of city conquerored effects the score Less turns to do a conquest= more points More cities conquerored= more points. The one that confuses me is the number of generals deployed. I can't tell if you get more or less points for deploying generals.
|
|
|
Post by soonerjbd on Oct 2, 2017 3:22:18 GMT
Well it gives you a score at the end based on how many generals you used, the star level of your country and the number of turns you took. I'm assuming it's based on the total score. I don't think the star level of country effects the score. Besides the other two you mention the number of city conquerored effects the score Less turns to do a conquest= more points More cities conquerored= more points. The one that confuses me is the number of generals deployed. I can't tell if you get more or less points for deploying generals. My mistake. I think you get more points for deploying fewer generals.
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Oct 2, 2017 3:27:04 GMT
.org/] [/url] I am looking at my past conquest score and it looks like the majority of points will come from doing conquest in less turns
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 2, 2017 3:55:22 GMT
best75 I believe that the star count of your country is taken into account for the scoring. I did a Finland conquest 2 turns slower than your Spain one, yet I gained around 20,0000 more points for turns than you did. Probably because Finland is one star and Spain is two.
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Oct 2, 2017 4:05:35 GMT
best75 I believe that the star count if your country is taken into account for the scoring. I did a Finland conquest 2 turns slower than your Spain one, yet I gained around 20,0000 more points for turns than you did. Probably because Finland is one star and Spain is two. True I also have a Finnish conquest that is 1 turn longer and is more than 20,000 pints for time as well .org/] [/url]
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 2, 2017 4:08:39 GMT
best75 I believe that the star count if your country is taken into account for the scoring. I did a Finland conquest 2 turns slower than your Spain one, yet I gained around 20,0000 more points for turns than you did. Probably because Finland is one star and Spain is two. True I also have a Finnish conquest that is 1 turn longer and is more than 20,000 pints for time as well I can also confirm that more generals equals less points as in my Finland conquest I only used Messe and got 5500 points for it.
|
|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Oct 2, 2017 4:13:56 GMT
True I also have a Finnish conquest that is 1 turn longer and is more than 20,000 pints for time as well I can also confirm that more generals equals less points as in my Finland conquest I only used Messe and got 5500 points for it. I am wondering I am playing Finland and I don't have any generals, and it looks like I'll end about at 100 turns, I need that A rating thou for medals, so I can get Vatutin as my first general😉
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Oct 2, 2017 4:15:41 GMT
True I also have a Finnish conquest that is 1 turn longer and is more than 20,000 pints for time as well I I can also confirm that more generals equals less points as in my Finland conquest I only used Messe and got 5500 points for it. In a earlier Finland 39 conquest I used only Auchinleck and got 6916 points. On another note in another Finland conquest where I deployed the same generals Leeb and Auchinleck, get exactly 3738 for it. So maybe the stats of the generals themselves also had an effect on score.
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Oct 2, 2017 7:10:21 GMT
I tend to get higher scores with one star nations. So I am pretty sure it matters. Looking at the contribution from each factors to the total score, it seems the number of round vastly outweighs the other two. From best75 's screenshot, that makes up to 94% of the total score. Numbers of generals and cities are economically insignificant.
|
|