|
|
Post by stoic on Oct 6, 2017 7:50:45 GMT
I have one more thing you have not answered. If the Soviets did not use human wave attacks, why would Zhukov himself have written multiple orders to his commanders telling them to stop using human wave attacks? 1. Zhukov, as far as I remember, said that commanders should avoid frontal assaults and use flanking maneuver instead. That is all... 2. There were many commanders in Red Army, many were incompetent enough to throw human lives away, but it was never a "strategical approach" to be memorated in games. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Oct 6, 2017 8:53:20 GMT
That's what they prefer to specify. Not soviets engeneering sapper special squads, not BM-13 or anything else what could be specified as an advantage but massive soviets hordes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb on Oct 6, 2017 10:33:01 GMT
I think we should just return to the topic
|
|
|
|
Post by Józef Poniatowski on Oct 6, 2017 13:01:54 GMT
I would like to see more variations for the super units, like the French getting a super tank (AMX 50), the British getting a super tank (the tortoise), and both of them get their own new abilities. The French tank gets to attack multiple times a turn without destroying and enemy (due to it's autoloader) and the tortoise gets bonuses against armored and stronghold units (i think the US Super tank should have the same by the way)
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Oct 6, 2017 13:15:24 GMT
The Germans deployed the great Gustavo railway gun. Germany already has super artillery but I don't think the stats of their super artillery reflect it well. I would change the movement of their super artillery to be slower than howitzers and give it the mortar ability to give it the role of a heavy siege artillery.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerjbd on Oct 6, 2017 13:52:25 GMT
The Germans deployed the great Gustavo railway gun. Germany already has super artillery but I don't think the stats of their super artillery reflect it well. I would change the movement of their super artillery to be slower than howitzers and give it the mortar ability to give it the role of a heavy siege artillery. I meant to mention this in the OP. I think the German super artillery should get crap movement but 3 Range. The railway guns like Gustav could fire for miles. I also really liked the Japanese Super Tank from WC3. |
|
|
|
Post by wolfblitzkrieger on Oct 13, 2017 6:10:26 GMT
When it comes to having a high kill ratio, Germany has nothing compared to Finland (Winter War). Soviets wouldn’t have lost so much if Stalin didn’t purge all of his intelligent generals.
|
|
|
|
Post by wolfblitzkrieger on Oct 13, 2017 6:17:13 GMT
Oops, didn’t look at page 3 before posting my comment
|
|
|
|
Post by wolfblitzkrieger on Oct 13, 2017 6:19:34 GMT
I would like to see a super submarine that could launch missiles (maximum of 3 or 4). It’s also disappointing that Italy is the only country that even has super submarine.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerjbd on Oct 13, 2017 13:52:03 GMT
I would like to see a super submarine that could launch missiles (maximum of 3 or 4). It’s also disappointing that Italy is the only country that even has super submarine. Italy’s super sub is alsonpretty disappointing. Not as good as stacked subs. |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Oct 13, 2017 14:00:56 GMT
I'd like to see a certain non-air units be nuclear capable.
For example special Super FA or special Super subs can fire shots that can be equipped with nukes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Henri Winkelman on Oct 13, 2017 16:41:39 GMT
I would love to see a German super battleship. If I had to choose one country that should have super battleships, then it should be Germany, looking back at the history, as during WWII they were the only ones who actually created super battleships, the Tirpitz and the Bismarck.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerjbd on Oct 13, 2017 17:36:54 GMT
I would love to see a German super battleship. If I had to choose one country that should have super battleships, then it should be Germany, looking back at the history, as during WWII they were the only ones who actually created super battleships, the Tirpitz and the Bismarck. Don’t forget about the Japanese. The Yamato and Musashi certainly qualify as super battleships. They were bigger and carried larger guns than the Bismarck. |
|
|
|
Post by Henri Winkelman on Oct 13, 2017 19:13:37 GMT
I thought they were created shortly after WWII. But still my point stands, I will change it a bit: Germany was one of the 2 countries with actual super battleships.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerjbd on Oct 14, 2017 6:45:01 GMT
I thought they were created shortly after WWII. But still my point stands, I will change it a bit: Germany was one of the 2 countries with actual super battleships. Nope. Yamato and Musashi were the largest battleships ever built. Also carried the largest guns - 18 inches! Both destroyed by the Americans during the war. Yamato beached itself to defend Okinawa. Senseless, as it was destroyed by air. Some of the fast battleships built by the Americans and British were similar in displacement to the Bismarck. The American Iowa-class battleships like the Missouri had 16-inch guns, which were bigger than the 15-inch guns the Bismarck and Turpitz carried. |
|
