Kurt Student.
First Lieutenant
What? Crete Lives Don't Matter.
Posts: 34 
|
Post by Kurt Student. on Oct 10, 2017 20:54:12 GMT
So With Most Generals, They Got It Right, Like Vatutin With His Tank Abilities And Plain Fighting In Ukraine, Guderian Being A Complete God, Rommel And Monty Kicking Complete A** In N. Africa, Konev Being Stronk In Infantry And Artillery, Student Being A Good Infantry And Air General, But People Like Palulus, Who Lead The 6th Army At Stalingrad, And Was A Good General, Has Crappy Skills And Is Horrid, Of Course This Won’t Be Changed, But Does Anyone Have Any more Choices For Generals Whom Have Skills That Were Too Bad Or Good For What they Actually Did? (P.S Sorry For The Long Read, And For Putting Out Three Threads In a Day)
|
|
|
|
Post by Tadamichi Kuribayashi on Oct 11, 2017 0:52:07 GMT
I think that Easytech gave him that bad of a skill due to his sudden change from commanding a battalion to an entire army.
|
|
Kurt Student.
First Lieutenant
What? Crete Lives Don't Matter.
Posts: 34
|
Post by Kurt Student. on Oct 11, 2017 1:05:12 GMT
Maybe, But He Did Amazing Doing It, He Was Appalled By The Idea OF Attacking Stalingrad, At Least Hes A Captain.
|
|
|
|
Post by Leonid Govorov on Oct 14, 2017 5:44:40 GMT
I vote for Goring. He was a complete loser in real life, responsible for most defeats of the third reich (I am sure stoic agrees with me on this one), yet he is the best land-air general! And Timoshenko and Rokkosovsky(not sure if I spelled that right, correct me if you will) have fought well in the war, participating in most soviet campagns and still are terrible. TLDR; Goring, Timoshenko and Rokkosovsky |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Oct 14, 2017 17:13:33 GMT
I vote for Goring. He was a complete loser in real life, responsible for most defeats of the third reich (I am sure stoic agrees with me on this one), yet he is the best land-air general! And Timoshenko and Rokkosovsky(not sure if I spelled that right, correct me if you will) have fought well in the war, participating in most soviet campagns and still are terrible. TLDR; Goring, Timoshenko and Rokkosovsky The Luftwaffe was effective, under certain circumstances. Rokossovsky HAD to take a huge nerf ortherwise he'd be the cheapest IAP gen (costing ONLY medals) Timoshenko, the 2nd Battle of Kharkov was probably what cost him. Maybe it was also because he did not physically command troops, more so organise initiatives & managed the logistical situation that weakened ET's view of him? |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Nov 13, 2017 1:48:06 GMT
I vote for Goring. He was a complete loser in real life, responsible for most defeats of the third reich (I am sure stoic agrees with me on this one), yet he is the best land-air general! And Timoshenko and Rokkosovsky(not sure if I spelled that right, correct me if you will) have fought well in the war, participating in most soviet campagns and still are terrible. TLDR; Goring, Timoshenko and Rokkosovsky The Luftwaffe was effective, under certain circumstances. Rokossovsky HAD to take a huge nerf ortherwise he'd be the cheapest IAP gen (costing ONLY medals) Timoshenko, the 2nd Battle of Kharkov was probably what cost him. Maybe it was also because he did not physically command troops, more so organise initiatives & managed the logistical situation that weakened ET's view of him? Because of other officers! |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Nov 16, 2017 12:54:38 GMT
I vote for Goring. He was a complete loser in real life, responsible for most defeats of the third reich (I am sure stoic agrees with me on this one), yet he is the best land-air general! And Timoshenko and Rokkosovsky(not sure if I spelled that right, correct me if you will) have fought well in the war, participating in most soviet campagns and still are terrible. TLDR; Goring, Timoshenko and Rokkosovsky That is defiantly true. They should be better. |
|
|
|
Post by Isoroku Yamamoto on Jan 24, 2018 19:40:24 GMT
I vote for Goring. He was a complete loser in real life, responsible for most defeats of the third reich (I am sure stoic agrees with me on this one), yet he is the best land-air general! And Timoshenko and Rokkosovsky(not sure if I spelled that right, correct me if you will) have fought well in the war, participating in most soviet campagns and still are terrible. TLDR; Goring, Timoshenko and Rokkosovsky I have used rokkosovsky and especially timoshenko, and they both are very good. |
|
marshalchina
First Lieutenant
Support the Proletariat Cause! Down with the Crapitalists and the bourgeoisie!
Posts: 45
|
Post by marshalchina on Feb 5, 2018 23:53:46 GMT
I think that Generalfeldmarschall Friedrich Paulus was nerfed because he defied Hitler at Stalingrad and his 6th Army was destroyed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Feb 6, 2018 3:31:15 GMT
I think that Generalfeldmarschall Friedrich Paulus was nerfed because he defied Hitler at Stalingrad and his 6th Army was destroyed. Paulus didn't show up as a vital commander other than at Stalingrad, so without much physical records of his ability to command, how can ET give him more worth? |
|
|
|
Post by clausvonstauffenberg on Feb 7, 2018 5:19:56 GMT
I agree. Göring was horrible at commanding the Luftwaffe along with the fact that he did horrible in the battle for Briton. But easy tech made him five stars for what I believe was that he was a fighter ace in WW1. Still did not like the man though. (In game and IRL)
|
|
|
|
Post by greatman on Feb 7, 2018 6:56:59 GMT
I vote for Manstein.In real life Guderian was the best tank guy. Anyways, am I wrong or right
|
|
marshalchina
First Lieutenant
Support the Proletariat Cause! Down with the Crapitalists and the bourgeoisie!
Posts: 45
|
Post by marshalchina on Feb 14, 2018 19:53:14 GMT
I vote for Manstein.In real life Guderian was the best tank guy. Anyways, am I wrong or right In real life, Manstein was the Wehrmacht’s greatest commander. He was responsible for the Manstein Plan which led to the Fall of France in just 6 weeks. He also breached the most fortified city in the Siege of Sevastopol. He almost won at Kursk. Finally, Guderian is the best tank commander in the game, not Manstein. Manstein is the best artillery commander surprisingly. |
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Feb 15, 2018 18:41:08 GMT
Göring has lost a huge ammount of Planes and at the battle of Britian he has focused on targets and peformed assaults when he obviously did not need to. The Luftwaffe was effective with their speed and against weaker/underdog nations and Göring expected that flying and commanding planes are the same but nope.
It was in many ET games, he was the 2nd best Air Commander, not sure if Arnold still keeps up the best Air Commander in WC4
Still, he does not qualify on the Skills and Stars in game
|
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Mar 18, 2018 19:45:05 GMT
I think that Generalfeldmarschall Friedrich Paulus was nerfed because he defied Hitler at Stalingrad and his 6th Army was destroyed. Actually, I think GeneralFeldmarschall Paulus was nerfed due to the fact he only commanded stuff for 3 years in the war and did not play a major part. Field marshal Witzelben did not command much stuff, but he was a field marshal. Guderian played a major part in the war, but he never got promoted to field marshal. Kleist did not play a very large part of the war, yet, he was field marshal. Easy tech rates the general by the amount he played, not be rank. |
|
