|
Post by secretblaze123 on Oct 24, 2017 4:03:53 GMT
Simply put it the ai on 1943 is broken. The soviets and the U.K. Always fall to the Germans in about 40 rounds (both allied and enemy) and playing as a two or one star country is practically impossible without a good general (I have Messe and Leeb but I never use them cause I usually save up for a tier three navy tank or howitser to place them on.) and by round 40 either Japan dies and the us or the axis have a death mob of troops pushing through the caucassus. What im saying is unlike in world conqueror 3 were the allies have a advantage in 1943, they just die (I mean the uk literally places 0 generals in Britain and just keeps placing troops in there cities when they are out of health. This happens both allied and enemy uk) s1.postimg.cc/2ghhnptu5b/image.png" alt="When the Bulgarian army with 3 cities is more numerous then the entire Soviet red army<br> "]
|
|
|
Post by Singlemalt on Oct 24, 2017 4:18:07 GMT
In the beginning i had the same thought.. however, due to its weakness independent on what side you start this game creates a challenge which makes you strugle more to get it done..
1 star egypt took me ages before i finsihed it..
Very important is to get the upper side befor eyour enemies have defeated all of your allies..
So in the end it gives me more challenge and that is what i like
|
|